KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Aquaculture Studies / 2019 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 1

Wild Fish vs. Farmed Fish: Consumer Perception in Turkey

Ahmet Faruk YEŞİLSU
Gülsün ÖZYURT
Murat DAĞTEKİN
Esen ALP ERBAY
Sayfa
37–43
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The consumers werewilling to pay extra money for farmed fish if they know them antibiotic-free.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Since it is not possible to meet the demand for fish meat through fisheries, it is triedto be met with the aquaculture.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:As a result, farmed fish production has been increasedin recent years.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The consumers werewilling to pay extra money for farmed fish if they know them antibiotic-free.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Since it is not possible to meet the demand for fish meat through fisheries, it is triedto be met with the aquaculture. As a result, farmed fish production has been increasedin recent years. Therefore, it is important to know how consumer trends are changedagainst farmed or wild fish. This study aimed to determine the factors affecting fishconsumption preferences of consumers living in Turkey. 472 people in coastal andinland areas were asked questions and factors influencing the formation of consumerpreferences were examined. Logistic regression was performed to find the mostproper model. According to the study, the majority of consumers have little knowledgeof the origin of the fish due to insufficient regulatory regulations in labeling. However,some consumers believed that the farmed fish may be more nutritionally valuable,while others thought that the farmed fish have poorer taste and texture compared towild fish and they were also concerned about contamination from polluted waters orcontaminated feed. One of the most troubling topics for consumers is the drug orantibiotic usage and their residues in the aquaculture sector. The consumers werewilling to pay extra money for farmed fish if they know them antibiotic-free.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

YEŞİLSU, A. F., ÖZYURT, G., DAĞTEKİN, M., ERBAY, E. A. (2022). Wild Fish vs. Farmed Fish: Consumer Perception in Turkey. Aquaculture Studies, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 1, 37–43. https://ajindex.com/articles/447607

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (10)

  1. Altintzoglou, T., Vanhonacker, F., Verbeke, W., & Luten, J. (2011). Association of health involvement and attitudes towards eating fish on farmed and wild fish consumption in Belgium, Norway and Spain. Aquaculture International, 19(3), 475-488.
  2. Altintzoglou, T., Sveinsdottir, K., Einarsdottir, G., Schelvis, R. & Luten, J.B. (2012) Evaluation of seafood product concepts by young adults and families with young children from Denmark, Norway and Iceland. Journal of Aquatic Food Product Technology, 21(5), 418-432. https://doi.org/10.1080/10498850.2011.608156 BSGM, (2018).
  3. Gıda, Tarım ve Hayvancılık Bakanlığı, Su Ürünleri İstatistikleri. Retrieved from https://www.tarim.gov.tr/sgb/Belgeler/SagMenuVeriler /BSGM.pdf (in Turkish). Cahu, C., Salen, P., & de Lorgeril, M. (2004). Farmed and wild fish in the prevention of cardiovascular diseases. Assessing possible differences in lipid nutritional values. Nutrition, Metabolism, and Cardiovascular Diseases, 14, 34–41.
  4. Cardoso, C., Lourenço, H., Costa, S., Gonçalves, S., & Leonor Nunes, M. (2016). Survey into the seafood consumption preferences and patterns in the Portuguese population: education, age, and health variability. Journal of Food Products Marketing, 22(4), 421-435.
  5. Costell, E., Tárrega, A., & Bayarri, S. (2010). Food acceptance. The role of consumer perception and attitudes. Chemosensory Perception, 3, 42–50.
  6. Dağtekin, M.,& Ak, O., ( 2007)“Doğu karadeniz bölgesinde su ürünleri tüketimi, ihracat ve ithalat potansiyeli,” SUMAE Yunus Araştırma Bülteni, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 14–17, 2007. FAO, (2016).
  7. Aquaculture Department (2010) The state of world fisheries and aquaculture. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. Glantz SA, & Slinker BK (2001) Primer of applied regression & analysis of variance. 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill. Hosmer DW Jr, Lemeshow S, & Sturdivant, RX (2013) Applied Logistic Regression. Third Edition. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons. Kole, A.P.W. (2003). Consumer opinions towards farmed fish, accounting for relevance and individual knowledge. In J. B. Luten, J. Oehlenschläger, & G. Ölafsdóttir (Eds.), Quality of fish from catch to consumer. Labelling, monitoring and traceability (pp. 393–400).
  8. Pampel FC (2000) Logistic regression: A primer. Sage University Papers Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, 07-132.
  9. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Pearson, D. (2002). Marketing organic food. Who buys it and what do they purchase? Food Australian, 54, 31–34.
  10. Santos, L., & Ramos, F.