Dergiler / Aquaculture Studies / 2022 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 1

Target Market Selection for the Major Aquaculture Products of Turkey - An Evaluation on Export Markets by Hybrid Multi-criteria Decision-making Approach

Sayfa
691–691
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

According to these seven criteria, Japan is the best target market for Trout and Sea Bass while Russian Federation is the best for Sea Bream

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:After 50 years of rapid development, today's aquaculture industry has become one of the driving forces of economic growth in many countries thanks to the increasing aquaculture production.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Turkey has achieved significant success in aquaculture production dominated by Trout (oncorhynchus mykiss), Sea Bass (dicentrarchus labrax), and Sea Bream (dicentrarchus labrax) species thanks to its geographical and biodiversity advantages.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:According to these seven criteria, Japan is the best target market for Trout and Sea Bass while Russian Federation is the best for Sea Bream
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

After 50 years of rapid development, today's aquaculture industry has become one of the driving forces of economic growth in many countries thanks to the increasing aquaculture production. However, less attention has been given to its growing global market demand and its contribution to relevant countries’ trade potential. Turkey has achieved significant success in aquaculture production dominated by Trout (oncorhynchus mykiss), Sea Bass (dicentrarchus labrax), and Sea Bream (dicentrarchus labrax) species thanks to its geographical and biodiversity advantages. Thereby, Turkey has an exporting advantage in the face of increasing global seafood consumption demand. In this paper, we focus on the target market selection of these priority products to support the exporting potential of Turkey. Therefore, this is a multi- criterion problem, and this paper aims to provide forecasting about target markets based on qualitative and quantitative criteria by combining fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) and the technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) methods. Seven criteria as trade balance, consumption, distance, average tariff, ease of doing business, non-tariff requirement and logistics performance index were chosen for evaluating the target markets. According to FAHP results, the trade balance criterion has the most significant effect while the distance criterion has least effect on the decision problem for ranking the target countries. According to these seven criteria, Japan is the best target market for Trout and Sea Bass while Russian Federation is the best for Sea Bream

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Çelik, P., Akmermer, B. (2022). Target Market Selection for the Major Aquaculture Products of Turkey - An Evaluation on Export Markets by Hybrid Multi-criteria Decision-making Approach. Aquaculture Studies, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 1, 691–691. https://ajindex.com/articles/447557

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Albadvi, A., Sharifi, S.A.R. and Qahri-Saremi, S., (2007). Application of "PROMETHEE" for market targeting: A case study on the TV market in Iran, Scientia Iranica 14(3), 221-229.
  2. Aghdaie, M.H. and Alimardani M., (2015). “Target market selection based on market segment evaluation: A multiple attribute decision making approach”, International Journal of Operational Research, 24(3):262-278. Büyüközkan, G., Kahraman, C., & Ruan, D. (2004). A fuzzy multi–criteria decision approach for software development strategy selection. International Journal of General Systems, 33, 259-280.
  3. Calabrese, A., Costa, R., Menichini, T. (2013), “Using Fuzzy AHP to Manage Intellectual Capital Assets: An Application to the ICT Service Industry”, Expert Systems with Applications, 40 (9), 3447-3755.
  4. Chaghooshi, A.J., Safari, H., Fathi, M.R. (2012), “Integration of Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy GTMA for Location Selection of Gas Pressure Reducing Stations: A Case Study”, Journal of Management Research, 4 (3), 152-169
  5. Chang, D.Y. (1996). Applications of the extent analysis method on Fuzzy AHP. European Journal of Operational Research. 95, 649-655.
  6. Cherry, D. (2020), “UN: Global aquaculture production continues to smash records”, https://www.intrafish.com/trade/un-global- aquaculture-production-continues-to-smash-records/2- 1-821895
  7. Chou, Y-C., Sun, C-C., Yen, H-Y. (2012), “Evaluating the Criteria for Human Resource for Science and Technology (HRST) Based on an Integrated Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy Dematel Approach”, Applied Soft Computing, 12, 64-71.
  8. Eyüboğlu, K. and Çelik, P. (2016). Financial Performance Evaluation of Turkish Energy Companies with Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS Methods, Business and Economics Research Journal, 7, 21-37.
  9. FAO (2020), http://www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/software/fi shstatj/en Gaston-Breton, Ch., & Martin, O. M. (2011). International market selection andsegmentation: a two-stage model. International Marketing Review, 28(3), 267–290. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02651331111132857
  10. GEOBYTES data base (2020), ''Geographical distance of countries'', https://geobytes.com/
  11. Ho, C.C. (2012), “Construct Factor Evaluation Model of Health Management Center Selected By Customers With Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process”, Expert Systems with Applications, 39, 954-959.
  12. Huang, C.C., Chu, P.-Y., Chiang, Y.H. (2008) “A Fuzzy AHP Application in Government-Sponsored R&D Project Selection” Omega, 36(6), 1038-1052.
  13. Hwang, C.L., & Yoon, K. (1981). Multiple attributes decision making methods and app