KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Annals of Medical Research / 2019 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 4

The effect of fibromyalgia syndrome to nasal mucociliary function in females

Isil Karaer CAKMAK
Tuba Tulay KOCA
Sayfa
759–762
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Clinically, women with FM should be followed up for possible adverse effects of prolonged mucociliary clearance duration such as sinonasal and middle ear infections.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Aim: Fibromyalgia syndrome (FM) is soft tissue rheumatism characterized by chronic widespread musculoskeletal pain.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Forty four (N=44) females were enrolled in the study.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Clinically, women with FM should be followed up for possible adverse effects of prolonged mucociliary clearance duration such as sinonasal and middle ear infections.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2010 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Aim: Fibromyalgia syndrome (FM) is soft tissue rheumatism characterized by chronic widespread musculoskeletal pain. Central sensitization–related neuroaudiological symptoms are frequently seen in patients with FM. The aim of this study was to investigate the duration of nasal mucociliary clearance in FM patients and its relation with pain.Material and Methods: A prospective case–control study was carried out in Otorhinolaryngology Clinic. Forty four (N=44) females were enrolled in the study. Twenty two (22) FM patients with age (p=0.5) and body mass index (BMI) (p=0.072) matched healthy controls were included in the study. The FM diagnosis has been determined by clinical examination according to the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 2010 criteria. All study participants underwent measurements of nasal mucociliary clearance duration by the same individual.Results: The mean age was 38.7 ± 1.8 years in FM group, while it was 37.05 ± 1.8 years in control. The mean duration of nasal mucociliary clearance were 8.06 ± 0.5 minutes in FM group, and 5.86 ± 0.4 minutes in control. The duration of nasal mucociliary clearance was longer in FM patients than controls (p=0.0005). The duration of mucociliary clearance was found positively correlated with visual analog scale (VAS) score (r=0.423; p=0.005).Conclusion: There was a significant prolonged nasal mucociliary clearance duration inpatients with FMand positively correlated with pain score. Clinically, women with FM should be followed up for possible adverse effects of prolonged mucociliary clearance duration such as sinonasal and middle ear infections.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

CAKMAK, I. K., KOCA, T. T. (2022). The effect of fibromyalgia syndrome to nasal mucociliary function in females. Annals of Medical Research, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 4, 759–762. https://ajindex.com/articles/447407

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (17)

  1. Huang HM, Cheng JJ, Liu CM, et al. Mucosal healing and mucociliary transportchange after endoscopic sinus surgery in children with chronic maxillary sinusitis. Int Jour Ped Otorhino 2006;70:1361-7
  2. Toppozada H, Michaels L, Toppozada M, et al. The human nasal mucosa in themenstrual cycle. J Laryngol Otol 1981;95:1237-47
  3. Toppozada H, Michaels L, Toppozada M, et al. The human respiratory nasal mucosa inpregnancy. J Laryngol Otol 1982;96:613-26
  4. Toppozada H, Toppozada M, El Gazzawi, et al. The human respiratory nasalmucosa in females using contraceptive pills. J Laryngol Otol 1984;98:43-51
  5. Toppozada H. The human nasal mucosa in the menopause. J Laryngol Otol 1988;102:314-8
  6. Aroor R, Sunu Ali Z, Gangadhara Somayaji KS. Do nasal surgeries affect mucociliary clearance? Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2017;69:24-8
  7. Ozbay I, Kucur C, Temizturk F, et al. Assessment of nasal mucociliary activity in patients with Behçet’s disease. J Laryngol Otol 2016;130:348-51
  8. Clauw DJ. Fibromyalgia: a clinical review. JAMA 2014;311:1547-55
  9. Forseth KO, Gran JT. The prevalence of fibromyalgia among women aged 20-49 years in Arendal, Norway. Scand J Rheumatol 1992;21:74-8
  10. Wolfe F, Brähler E, Hinz A, et al. Fibromyalgia prevalence, somatic symptom reporting, andthe dimensionality of polysymptomatic distress: results from a survey of the general population. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2013;65:777-85
  11. Bayazit YA, Gürsoy S, Ozer E, et al. Neurotologic manifestations of the fibromyalgia syndrome.J Neurol Sci 2002;196:77-80
  12. Sawada F, Nomura Y, Goto F, et al. Relationship of physical distress to dizziness in patients with fibromyalgia.Acta Otolaryngol 2016;136:56-61
  13. Stanley P, MacWilliam L, Greenstone M, et al. Efficacy of a saccharintest for screening to detect abnormal mucociliary clearance. Br J Dis Chest 1984;78:62-5
  14. Eccles R. Physiology of the nose. In: Jones A, Phillips D, Hilgers F, editors. Diseases of the Head and Neck, Nose and Throat. London: Arnold 1998;675-6
  15. Wessely S, Hotopf M. Is fibromyalgia a distinct clinical entity? Historical and epidemiological evidence. Baillieres Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 1999;13:427-36
  16. Aaron LA, Burke MM, Buchwald D. Overlapping conditions among patientswith chronic fatigue syndrome, fibromyalgia, and temporomandibulardisorder. Arch Intern Med 2000;160:221-7
  17. Tomasdottir MO, Sigurdsson JA, Petursson H, et al. Self reported childhood difficulties, adult multimorbidity and all