Dergiler / Annals of Medical Research / 2019 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 5

YouTube as an information source for intra-articuler knee injection

Sayfa
918–923
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Creating high-quality videos that meet these criteria seems to be a necessity of modernmedical education.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Aim: Intra-articular knee injections are frequently applied interventions in clinical practice.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:A total of 55 videoshaving the inclusion criteria, were analyzed.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Creating high-quality videos that meet these criteria seems to be a necessity of modernmedical education.
🔬Tür:Literatür & Derleme Çalışması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Aim: Intra-articular knee injections are frequently applied interventions in clinical practice. YouTube is the most popular videosharingWeb site that can be accessed as an information source. In this study, we aim to examine the educational value of the videosabout intra-articular knee injections on YouTube.Material and Methods: The YouTube database was searched using the “intra-articular knee injection” keyword. A total of 55 videoshaving the inclusion criteria, were analyzed. Four independent reviewers assessed videos for procedural technique and educationalquality using a 5-point Global Quality Scale (GQS). To evaluate the reliability the 5-point Discern scale was used.Results: The mean duration of the videos was 3.9 (± 3.8) minutes. Approximately 236.2 (± 231.3) people watched each video. Themean number of daily views was 58.6 (± 130.5). The most common indication was osteoarthritis (43.6%) and the most commoninjection material were corticosteroids (40%). The most populer approaches were superolateral (27.3%) and anterolateral (25.5%).43.6% of the patients underwent complete sterile injection. The mean reliability score was 1.58 (± 1.1) and the mean GQS score was2.47 (± 1.0).Conclusions: Web-based learning applications related to intra-articular knee injections are becoming increasingly common.Unfortunately, we thought that YouTube content had an insufficient and inconsistent educational quality even though when it waspublished by healthcare professionals. Therefore, it is very important to examine these videos in terms of reliability and GQS beforeusing them for educational purposes. Creating high-quality videos that meet these criteria seems to be a necessity of modernmedical education.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ATAR, E., KARAMAN, Ç. A., KÜÇÜKAKKAŞ, O., BERBEROGLU, A. H., KORKMAZ, M. B. (2022). YouTube as an information source for intra-articuler knee injection. Annals of Medical Research, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 5, 918–923. https://ajindex.com/articles/447280

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. Society AP. Guideline for the management of pain in osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis and juvenile chronic arthritis. American Pain Society Glenview, IL, 2002
  2. Dinçer Ü. Periferik eklem enjeksiyonları. Turkiye Klinikleri J PMR-Special Topics 2013;6:22-30
  3. Douglas RJ. Aspiration and injection of the knee joint: approach portal. Knee Surg Relat Res 2014;26:1-6 4. Maricar N, Callaghan MJ, Felson DT, et al. Predictors of response to intra-articular steroid injections in knee osteoarthritis-a systematic review. Rheumatology 2012;52:1022-32
  4. Jackson DW, Evans NA, Thomas BM. Accuracy of needle placement into the intra-articular space of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002;84:1522-7
  5. Gachoud D, Guinot-Bourquin S, Monti M, et al. Arthrocentesis and joint infiltration. Rev Med Suisse 2008;4:2330-2
  6. Sterrett AG, Bateman H, Guthrie J, et al. Virtual rheumatology: using simulators and a formal workshop to teach medical students, internal medicine residents, and rheumatology subspecialty residents arthrocentesis. J Clin Rheumatol 2011;17:121-3
  7. Swiss Society of Rheumatology. Schweizerische Gesellschaften für Rheumatologie sowie für Physikalische Medizin und Rehabilitation 2011. Available at: https:// www.rheuma-net.ch/de/dok/sgr-dokumente/behandlung/ therapie/weitere/74-injektionen-in-der-rheumatologie/ file?force-download=1. Access date 15.02.2019 9. Singh AG, Singh S, Singh PP. YouTube for information on rheumatoid arthritis--a wakeup call? The J Rheumatol 2012;39:899-903
  8. Tolu S, Yurdakul OV, Basaran B, et al. English-language videos on YouTube as a source of information on selfadminister subcutaneous anti-tumour necrosis factor agent injections. Rheumatol Int 2018;38:1285-92
  9. Rittberg R, Dissanayake T, Katz SJ. A qualitative analysis of methotrexate self-injection education videos on YouTube. Clin Rheumatol 2016;35:1329-33
  10. Wong K, Doong J, Trang T, et al. YouTube videos on botulinum toxin a for wrinkles: a useful resource for patient education. Dermatol Surg 2017;43:1466-73
  11. Blinn JF. What is a pixel? IEEE Comput Graph Appl 2005;25:82-7
  12. Rössler B, Lahner D, Schebesta K, et al. Medical information on the Internet: quality assessment of lumbar puncture and neuroaxial block techniques on YouTube. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2012;114:655-8
  13. Tourinho FS, de Medeiros KS, Salvador PT, Analysis of the YouTube videos on basic life support and cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Rev Col Bras Cir 2012;39:335-9
  14. Zhang Q, Zhang T, Lv H,