KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Annals of Medical Research / 2019 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 9

Breast carcinoma detected in breast specimens: A fifteen-year single-center experience

Ersin OZASLAN
Fatoş TEKELİOĞLU
Hatice KARAMAN
Ulas Serkan TOPALOGLU
Ebru AKAY
Fatma ŞENEL
Sayfa
1939–1942
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

It is also quite common at a young age, and lymph nodemetastasis is common.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Aim:The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of breast carcinomas in our center, to examine their clinicopathologicalcharacteristics and to present our experiences.Material and Methods: A total of 4309breast biopsy cases whose histopathological examination was performed in the PathologyClinic between 2003 and 2018 were retrospectively evaluated.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The age, operation procedure, histopathological examination resultsand postoperative prognostic indices of breast carcinoma cases were presented and analysis results of these parameters werecompared with literature data and discussed.Results: Six hundred thirty five (14.7%) of the patients were administered with modified radical mastectomy + lumpectomy.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:It is also quite common at a young age, and lymph nodemetastasis is common.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2003 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Aim:The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of breast carcinomas in our center, to examine their clinicopathologicalcharacteristics and to present our experiences.Material and Methods: A total of 4309breast biopsy cases whose histopathological examination was performed in the PathologyClinic between 2003 and 2018 were retrospectively evaluated. The age, operation procedure, histopathological examination resultsand postoperative prognostic indices of breast carcinoma cases were presented and analysis results of these parameters werecompared with literature data and discussed.Results: Six hundred thirty five (14.7%) of the patients were administered with modified radical mastectomy + lumpectomy. Our casesof 65.2% were grade II, 21.3% of them were grade I, and 13.5% of them were grade III.Lymph node metastasis and recurrence weredetected in 53.2% and 9.75% of the cases, respectively, the records of whom were reached. 6.41% of the patients had metastasis atthe time of diagnosis. 12.54% of the patients who were followed up until 2019 died.Conclusion: The incidence of breast carcinoma in our center is 37%. It is also quite common at a young age, and lymph nodemetastasis is common.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

OZASLAN, E., TEKELİOĞLU, F., KARAMAN, H., TOPALOGLU, U. S., AKAY, E., ŞENEL, F. (2022). Breast carcinoma detected in breast specimens: A fifteen-year single-center experience. Annals of Medical Research, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 9, 1939–1942. https://ajindex.com/articles/447136

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. Lakhani S, Ellis I, Schnitt S, et al. WHO Classification of Tumours of the Breast 4th. Lyon: IARC Press; 2012
  2. Tavassoli FA, Devilee P, editors. Pathologyand Genetics of Tumours of the Breast and Female Genital Organs. Lyon: IARC Press; 2003
  3. Orvieto E, Maiorano E, BottiglieriL, Maisonne et al. Clinico pathologic characteristics of invasive lobular carcinoma of thebreast: results of an analysis of 530 casesfrom a singleinstitution. Cancer 2008;113: 1511-20
  4. Talman ML, Jensen MB, Rank F. Invasive lobular breast cancer. Prognostic significance of histological malign ancygrading. Acta Oncol 2007;46: 803-80 5. Dillon D A, Guidi AJ, Schnitt SJ. Pathology of invasive breast cancer. In: Harris JR, Lipmann ME, Morrow M, and Osborne CK, eds. Diseases of the Breast. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2010
  5. Özmen V. Breast Cancer in Turkey: Clinical and Histopathological Characteristics (Analysis of 13.240 Patients). J Breast Health 2014;10:98-105
  6. Fidaner C, Eser SY, Parkin DM. Incidence in Izmir in 1993–1994; First results from Izmir cancer registry. Eur J Cancer 2001;37: 83-92
  7. Mollahaliloğlu S, Başara BB, Eryılmaz Z, eds. T.C. Sağlık Bakanlığı Sağlık İstatistikleri Yıllığı. Ankara: Kalkan Matbaacılık; 2010
  8. Ravdin PM, Cronin KA, Howlader N, et al. TheDecrease in Breast-Cancer Incidence in 2003 in the United States N Engl J Med 2007; 356:1670-1674
  9. Elston CW, EllisI O. Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. I. Thevalue of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long-termfollow-up. Histopathology 1991;19: 403-10
  10. Anders CK, Hsu DS, Broadwater G, et al. Young age at diagnosis correlates with worse prognosis and defines a subset of breast cancers with shared patterns of gene expression. J Clin Oncol 2008; 26: 3324-3330
  11. Ehinger A, Malmström P, Bendahl PO, et al. South and South- East Swedish Breast Cancer Groups. Histological grade provides significant progno sticinformation in addition to breast cancer subtypes defined according to St Gallen 2013. Acta Oncol 2017;56: 68-74
  12. Sendto Makki J. Diversity of breast carcinoma: histological subtypes and clinical relevance. Clin Med Insights Pathol 2015; 8: 23-31
  13. Henson DE, Ries L, Freedman LS, et al. Relation shipamong out come, stage of disease, and histologic gradefor 22,616 cases of breast cancer. The basisfor a prognosticindex. Cancer1991;68:2142-9
  14. Rosenberg J, Chia YL, Plevritis S. Theeffect of age, rac