Dergiler / Annals of Medical Research / 2019 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 9

Do different headache types present with varying MRI findings?

Sayfa
1782–1786
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Increased white matter hyperintensity was present in patients with headaches, and especially those with migraine compared to the controls.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Aim: Studies evaluating the magnetic resonance imaging findings in headache cases mostly focus on migraine and tension headache.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:In the current study, we aimed to evaluate the possible differences in the magnetic resonance imaging reports between the common headache types presenting with normal neurological findings.Materials and Methods: The magnetic resonance imaging findings of 170 patients aged between 18-45 years that presented with the complaints of headache were retrospectively evaluated.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Increased white matter hyperintensity was present in patients with headaches, and especially those with migraine compared to the controls.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Aim: Studies evaluating the magnetic resonance imaging findings in headache cases mostly focus on migraine and tension headache. In the current study, we aimed to evaluate the possible differences in the magnetic resonance imaging reports between the common headache types presenting with normal neurological findings.Materials and Methods: The magnetic resonance imaging findings of 170 patients aged between 18-45 years that presented with the complaints of headache were retrospectively evaluated. The patients with headaches were divided into the following groups: migraine, tension headache, medication overuse headache, and other headaches (cluster headache, hemicrania continua, paroxysmal hemicrania, trigeminal neuralgia), each consisting of 30 cases. Also, a control group was formed with 50 patients without a headache. The extracerebral, major and minor intracranial abnormalities were noted for all groups. The χ2 test was used to compare the data between the groups.Results: When the patients with headaches were evaluated, clinically silent brain infarct was detected as a major intracranial abnormality only in one patient with trigeminal neuralgia. The incidence of minor abnormalities was higher in the headache groups compared to the controls (p0.05).Conclusion: There was no significant difference between the headache types and the MRI findings. Increased white matter hyperintensity was present in patients with headaches, and especially those with migraine compared to the controls.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

BAYKAN, A. H., ŞAHİN, Ş., ALTUNİSİK, E. (2022). Do different headache types present with varying MRI findings?. Annals of Medical Research, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 9, 1782–1786. https://ajindex.com/articles/447087

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (16)

  1. Gilbert JW, Johnson KM, Larkin GL, et al. Atraumatic headache in US emergency departments: recent trends in CT/MRI utilisation and factors associated with severe intracranial pathology. EMJ. 2012;29:576-81
  2. Alstadhaug KB, Ofte HK, Kristoffersen ES. Preventing and treating medication overuse headache. Pain Rep. 2017;2:612
  3. Fazekas F, Chawluk JB, Alavi A, et al. MR signal abnormalities at 1.5 T in Alzheimer’s dementia and normal aging. AJR. 1987;149:351-6
  4. Honningsvag LM, Hagen K, Haberg A, et al. Intracranial abnormalities and headache: A population-based imaging study (HUNT MRI). Cephalalgia. 2016;36:113-21
  5. Wardlaw JM, Smith EE, Biessels GJ, et al. Neuroimaging standards for research into small vessel disease and its contribution to ageing and neurodegeneration. Lancet Neurol. 2013;12:822-38
  6. Jordan JE, Ramirez GF, Bradley WG, et al. Economic and outcomes assessment of magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of headache. J Natl Med Assoc. 2000;92:573-8
  7. Tsushima Y, Endo K. MR imaging in the evaluation of chronic or recurrent headache. Radiology. 2005;235:575-9
  8. Kruit MC, van Buchem MA, Launer LJ, et al. Migraine is associated with an increased risk of deep white matter lesions, subclinical posterior circulation infarcts and brain iron accumulation: the population-based MRI CAMERA study. Cephalalgia. 2010;30:129-36
  9. Palm-Meinders IH, Koppen H, Terwindt GM, et al. Structural brain changes in migraine. Jama. 2012;308:1889-97
  10. Hamedani AG, Rose KM, Peterlin BL, et al. Migraine and white matter hyperintensities: the ARIC MRI study. Neurology. 2013;81:1308-13
  11. Lee MJ, Park BY, Cho S, et al. Cerebrovascular reactivity as a determinant of deep white matter hyperintensities in migraine. Neurology. 2019;92:e342-e50
  12. Xie H, Zhang Q, Huo K, et al. Association of white matter hyperintensities with migraine features and prognosis. BMC Neurol. 2018;18:93
  13. Kurth T, Mohamed S, Maillard P, et al. Headache, migraine, and structural brain lesions and function: population based Epidemiology of Vascular Ageing-MRI study. BMJ. 2011;342:7357
  14. Swartz RH, Kern RZ. Migraine is associated with magnetic resonance imaging white matter abnormalities: a meta-analysis. Arch Neurol. 2004;61:1366-8
  15. Kruit MC, van Buchem MA, Hofman PA, et al. Migraine as a risk factor for subclinical brain lesions. Jama. 2004;291:427-34
  16. Monteith T, Gardener H, Rundek T, et al. Migraine, white matter hyperintensities, and subclinical brain infarcti