KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Annals of Medical Research / 2019 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 7

Age estimation based on the third molar development in a Turkish population: A radiographic study

Sevgi ÖZCAN
Güldane MAGAT
Sayfa
1178–1183
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

There were nosignificant differences in third molar development between genders.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Aim: The aim of this study was to determine the maturation levels of the third molar teeth of individuals aged between 7 and 25years, to evaluate the relationship between dental maturation, chronological age and gender, and to test the reliability of this formulaby developing regression formulas based on dental maturation data of the third molars for age estimation in a Turkish population.Material and Methods: In this retrospective study, digital panoramic radiographs of a total of 630 patients including 380 females and250 males, ages 7-25 years were used.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The descriptive statistics, Cohen’s Kappa, Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Kruskal Wallis, Chi-Square, Mann-Whitney U, Wilcoxon, Spearman Correlation and Linear regression tests were used for statistical analysis.Results: The mean chronological age (CA) was 14.38±2.51 years, with a median age of 14.00 years.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:There were nosignificant differences in third molar development between genders.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to determine the maturation levels of the third molar teeth of individuals aged between 7 and 25years, to evaluate the relationship between dental maturation, chronological age and gender, and to test the reliability of this formulaby developing regression formulas based on dental maturation data of the third molars for age estimation in a Turkish population.Material and Methods: In this retrospective study, digital panoramic radiographs of a total of 630 patients including 380 females and250 males, ages 7-25 years were used. The dental maturation of the third molars on the panoramic radiographs was evaluated withthe modified Demirjian’s classification system. The descriptive statistics, Cohen’s Kappa, Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Kruskal Wallis, Chi-Square, Mann-Whitney U, Wilcoxon, Spearman Correlation and Linear regression tests were used for statistical analysis.Results: The mean chronological age (CA) was 14.38±2.51 years, with a median age of 14.00 years. Mann-Whitney U test showedthat there was no statistically significant difference between the mean CA for females and males (p = 0.968). The mean age differencebetween the estimated dental age (DA) and CA for females and males was 0.002 and -0.004 years, respectively. This was found notto be statistically significant according to Wilcoxon-signed ranks test (p=0.541).Conclusion: According to the results of this study, the use of third molars as a developmental marker is appropriate. There were nosignificant differences in third molar development between genders.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ÖZCAN, S., MAGAT, G. (2022). Age estimation based on the third molar development in a Turkish population: A radiographic study. Annals of Medical Research, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 7, 1178–1183. https://ajindex.com/articles/446932

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (16)

  1. Erbudak HO, Ozbek M, Uysal S, et al. Application of Kvaal et al.’s age estimation method to panoramic radiographs from Turkish individuals. Forensic Sci Int 2012;219:141-6
  2. Cameriere R, Flores-Mir C, Mauricio F, et al. Effects of nutrition on timing of mineralization in teeth in a Peruvian sample by the Cameriere and Demirjian methods. Ann Hum Biol 2007;34:547-56
  3. Panchbhai AS. Dental radiographic indicators, a key to age estimation. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2011;40:199-212
  4. Cattaneo C, De Angelis D, Ruspa M, et al. How old am I? Age estimation in living adults: a case report. J Forensic Odontostomatol 2008;26:39-43
  5. Schmeling A, Geserick G, Reisinger W, Olze A. Age estimation. Forensic Sci Int 2007;165:178-81
  6. Garn SM, Lewis AB, Blizzard RM. Endocrıne Factors In Dental Development. J Dent Res 1965;44:Suppl:243-58
  7. Fereira JL, Fereira AE, Ortega AI. Methods for the analysis of hard dental tissues exposed to high temperatures. Forensic Sci Int 2008;178:119-24
  8. Aka PS, Canturk N, Dagalp R, Yagan M. Age determination from central incisors of fetuses and infants. Forensic Sci Int. 2009;184:15-20
  9. Pereira CP, Escobar CP, Santos JC. Age estimation of unaccompanied minors: A portuguese overview. Ann Forensic Res Analys 2015;2:1012
  10. Sisman Y, Uysal T, Yagmur F, Ramoglu S. Third-Molar Development in Relation to Chronologic Age in Turkish Children and Young Adults. Angle Orthod 2007;77:1040-5
  11. Meinl A, Tangl S, Huber C, et al. The chronology of third molar mineralization in the Austrian population-a contribution to forensic age estimation. Forensic Sci Int 2007;169:161-7
  12. Demirjian A, Goldstein H, Tanner JM. A new system of dental age assessment. Hum Biol 1973;45:211-27
  13. Orhan K, Ozer L, Orhan AI, et al. Radiographic evaluation of third molar development in relation to chronological age among Turkish children and youth. Forensic Sci Int 2007;165:46-51
  14. Karataş OH, Öztürk F, Dedeoğlu N, et al. Radiographic evaluation of third-molar development in relation to the chronological age of Turkish children in the southwest eastern Anatolia region. Forensic Sci Int 2013;232:238.1-5
  15. Martin-de las Heras S, García-Fortea P, Ortega A, et al. Third molar development according to chronological age in populations from Spanish and Magrebian origin. Forensic Sci Int 2008;174:47-53
  16. Mincer HH, Harris EF, Berryman HE. Study of Third Molar Development and Its Use as an Estimator of Chronological Age. J Forensic Sci 1993;38:379-90. 17