KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Annals of Medical Research / 2019 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 9

The evaluation of results in minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis for tibial shaft and 1/3 distal tibia fractures

Enes SARI
Fazli Levent UMUR
Selami ÇAKMAK
Sayfa
1846–1851
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Average AOFAS score was 85.7 (63-100).Conclusion: MIPO is a safe and effective method for the tibial shaft and the tibia distal 1/3 region fractures regarding the high union rates, low complication incidence and good functional results.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Aim: Our study aims to retrospectively evaluate the clinical, radiological and functional results of MIPO (minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis) in the treatment of tibial shaft and tibia distal 1/3 fractures.Material and Methods: Seventeen patients who underwent MIPO surgery due to tibial shaft and tibia distal 1/3 fractures between March 2011 – March 2015 were included in this study.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Several parameters evaluated including radiological union, full-weight bearing, alignment problems, soft tissue complications, implant irritation, implant removal and AOFAS Score.Results: The most common fractures were noted as 42-A1, 42-B1 and 43-A1 according to AO/OTA Classification.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Average AOFAS score was 85.7 (63-100).Conclusion: MIPO is a safe and effective method for the tibial shaft and the tibia distal 1/3 region fractures regarding the high union rates, low complication incidence and good functional results.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2011 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Aim: Our study aims to retrospectively evaluate the clinical, radiological and functional results of MIPO (minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis) in the treatment of tibial shaft and tibia distal 1/3 fractures.Material and Methods: Seventeen patients who underwent MIPO surgery due to tibial shaft and tibia distal 1/3 fractures between March 2011 – March 2015 were included in this study. Several parameters evaluated including radiological union, full-weight bearing, alignment problems, soft tissue complications, implant irritation, implant removal and AOFAS Score.Results: The most common fractures were noted as 42-A1, 42-B1 and 43-A1 according to AO/OTA Classification. The average follow-up period was 29.5 months (5-47 months). The average time for union was 4.7 months (2.5-10 months). The average period for full weight-bearing was 5.2 months (1-12 months). One patient (5.8%) had malunion (6 degrees of anterior angulation). Ten (58.8%) patients had complaints about medial sided ankle pain with wearing long boots. Three patients (17.6%) underwent implant removal. Average AOFAS score was 85.7 (63-100).Conclusion: MIPO is a safe and effective method for the tibial shaft and the tibia distal 1/3 region fractures regarding the high union rates, low complication incidence and good functional results.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

SARI, E., UMUR, F. L., ÇAKMAK, S. (2022). The evaluation of results in minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis for tibial shaft and 1/3 distal tibia fractures. Annals of Medical Research, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 9, 1846–1851. https://ajindex.com/articles/446781

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (16)

  1. Yin B, Chen W, Zhang Q, et al. Tibial fracture treated by minimally invasive plating using a novel low-cost, high-technique system. Int Orthop 2012;36:1687–93
  2. Newman SDS, Mauffrey CPC, Krikler S. Distal metadiaphyseal tibial fractures. Injury. 2011;42:975–84
  3. Ehlinger M, Adam P, Bonnomet F. Minimally invasive locking screw plate fixation of non-articular proximal and distal tibia fractures. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2010;96:800–9
  4. Ronga M, Shanmugam C, Longo UG, et al. Minimally Invasive Osteosynthesis of Distal Tibial Fractures Using Locking Plates. Orthop Clin North Am. 2009;40:499–504
  5. Calori GM, Tagliabue L, Mazza E, et al. Tibial pilon fractures: Which method of treatment? Injury 2010;41:1183–90
  6. Rudge W, Newman K, Trompeter A. Fractures of the tibial shaft in adults. Orthop Trauma 2014;28:243–55
  7. Morgan SJ, Jeray KJ. Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis in Fractures of the Tibia 2001;11:195–204
  8. Sarmiento A, Sharpe FE, Ebramzadeh E, et al.Factor influencing the outcome of closed tibial fractures treated with functional bracing. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1995;315:8–24
  9. Matthews SJE, Nikolaou VS, Giannoudis PV, et al. Surgical Treatment of Extra-articular or Simple Intra-articular Distal Tibial Fractures: MIPO Versus Supercutaneous Plating. Injury 2014;22:697–703
  10. Li Y, Liu L, Tang X, et al. Comparison of low, multidirectional locked nailing and plating in the treatment of distal tibial metadiaphyseal fractures. Int Orthop 2012;36:1457–62
  11. Paluvadi SV, Lal H, Mittal D, et al. Management of fractures of the distal third tibia by minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis - A prospective series of 50 patients. J Clin Orthop Trauma 2014;5:129–36
  12. Vallier HA, Le TT, Bedi A. Radiographic and clinical comparisons of distal tibia shaft fractures (4 to 11 cm proximal to the plafond): Plating versus intramedullary nailing. J Orthop Trauma 2008;22:307–11
  13. Li Y, Jiang X, Guo Q, et al. Treatment of distal tibial shaft fractures by three different surgical methods: A randomized, prospective study. Int Orthop 2014;38:1261–7
  14. Zou J, Zhang W, Zhang CQ. Comparison of minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis with open reduction and internal fixation for treatment of extra-articular distal tibia fractures. Injury 2013;44:1102–6
  15. Redfern DJ, Syed SU, Davies SJ. Fractures of the distal tibia: Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis. Injury 2004;35:615–20
  16. Iqbal HJ, Pidikiti P. Treatment of distal tibia metaphy