Dergiler / Annals of Medical Research / 2019 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 3

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: Factors affecting prognosis and single-center surgery results

Sayfa
335–342
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

In addition, satisfactory results can be obtained with the use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors and adequate surgical margins.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Aim: Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal tumors of the gastrointestinal tract.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical features and histopathological findings of GIST cases who underwent surgical treatment in our clinic in terms of prognostic criteria.Material and Methods: The patients operated for GIST between January 1, 2007 and May 31, 2014 were included in this study.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:In addition, satisfactory results can be obtained with the use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors and adequate surgical margins.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2007 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Aim: Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal tumors of the gastrointestinal tract. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical features and histopathological findings of GIST cases who underwent surgical treatment in our clinic in terms of prognostic criteria.Material and Methods: The patients operated for GIST between January 1, 2007 and May 31, 2014 were included in this study. Demographic data, presenting symptoms, ASA scores, diagnostic methods, tumor localizations, use of imatinib before surgery, surgical treatment methods, postoperative complications, tumor size, mitotic activity, immunohistochemical markers, prognostic risk classification, follow-up periods, use of imatinib after surgery, recurrence status and survival data were examinedResults: A total of 60 patients were included in the study. The median age was 56.5 (29-81) years . Fifty five of patients were males. Synchronous tumors in more than one location existed in approximately 7% of the patients. The surgical margin was positive in 14 (23.3%) patients after the surgical procedure. The recurrence and metastasis rates of these patients were 14.3% and 42.8%, respectively. On the other hand, these rates were 10.8% and 17.3% respectively in the patients with negative surgical margin. The expected 5-year survival rates according to the risk classification was 66.7% for very low-risk patients, 85.7% for low-risk patients, 59.7% for moderate-risk patients and 47.7% for high-risk patients.Conclusion: GISTs have relatively good prognosis compared to epithelial malignant tumors but require long-term follow-up. In addition, satisfactory results can be obtained with the use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors and adequate surgical margins.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

BİLDİK, N., ACAR, A., KEMENT, M., ÇETİN, K., GUNDOGAN, G. A., GÜNDOĞAN, E. (2022). Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: Factors affecting prognosis and single-center surgery results. Annals of Medical Research, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 3, 335–342. https://ajindex.com/articles/446702

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Crosby JA, Catton CN, Davis A, et al. Malignant gastrointestinal stromal tumours of the small intestine: a review of 50 cases from a prospective database Ann Surg Oncol 2001;8:50-9
  2. Park JK, Choi SH, Lee S, et al. Malignant Gastrointestinal StromalTumor of the Gallbladder. J Korean Med Sci 2004;19:763-7
  3. Kang YK, Kang HJ, Kim KM, et al. Clinical practice guideline for accurate diagnosis and effective treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumor in Korea. Cancer Res Treat 2012;44:85-96
  4. Kindblom LG, Remotti HE, Aldenborg F, Meis-Kindblom JM. Gastrointestinal pacemaker cell tumor (GIPACT). Gastrointestinal stromal tumors show phenotypic characteristics of the interstitial cells of Cajal. Am J Pathol 1998;153:1259-69
  5. Panizo-Santos A, Sola I, Vega F, et al. Predicting metastatic risk of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: Role of cell proliferation and cell cycle regulatory proteins. Int J Surg Pathol 2000;8:133-44
  6. Fletcher CD, Berman JJ, Corless C, et al. Diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A consensus approach. Hum Pathol 2002;33:459-65
  7. Miettinen M, Lasota J. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2013;42:399-415
  8. Gold JS, Gönen M, Gutiérrez A, et al. Development and validation of a prognostic nomogram for recurrence-free survival after complete surgical resection of localised primary gastrointestinal stromal tumour: a retrospective analysis. Lancet Oncol 2009;10:1045-52
  9. McCarter MD, Antonescu CR, Ballman KV, et al. Microscopically positive margins for primary gastrointestinal stromal tumors: analysis of risk factors and tumor recurrence. J Am Coll Surg 2012;215:53-9
  10. Catena F, Di Battista M, Ansaloni L, et al. Microscopic margins of resection influence primary gastrointestinal stromal tumor survival. Onkologie 2012;35:645-8
  11. Miettinen M, Makhlouf H, Sobin LH, et al. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the jejunum and ileum: a clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular genetic study of 906 cases before imatinib with long-term follow-up. Am J Surg Pathol 2006;30:477-89
  12. Antonescu CR, Sommer G, Sarran L, et al. Association of KIT exon 9 mutations with nongastric primary site and aggressive behavior: KIT mutation analysis and clinical correlates of 120 gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Clin Cancer Res 2003;9:3329-37
  13. Miettinen M, Sobin LH, Lasota J. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the stomach: A clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular genetic studies of 1765 cas