KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Annals of Medical Research / 2020 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 1

The effects of carpal tunnel syndrome on sleep quality

Özgür Zeliha KARAAHMET
Mufit AKYÜZ
Gülşah KARATAŞ
Öznur KÜTÜK
Elif YALÇIN
Sayfa
381–387
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

There was a positive correlation between PSQI and Boston-SSS, Boston-FSS, and total Boston values (p

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Aim: Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common mononeuropathy of the upper extremities.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Pittsburgh SleepQuality Index (PSQI) was used to evaluate sleep quality and disorders.Results: A total of 94 CTS patients (80 female, 14 male) and 33 healthy controls were included.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:There was a positive correlation between PSQI and Boston-SSS, Boston-FSS, and total Boston values (p
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Aim: Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common mononeuropathy of the upper extremities. The aim of this study was toinvestigate the relationship between different compression levels and sleep quality in patients with clinically and electrophysiologicallydiagnosed CTS.Material and Methods: Patients with CTS diagnosed by electroneuromyographic evaluation and healthy controls were included inthe study. Demographic characteristics and disease symptoms were recorded carefully. The Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire[symptom severity scale (SSS) and functional status scale (FSS)] was used to assess the severity of symptoms. Pittsburgh SleepQuality Index (PSQI) was used to evaluate sleep quality and disorders.Results: A total of 94 CTS patients (80 female, 14 male) and 33 healthy controls were included. The median ages were similar among thegroups (patient vs. control, mild-CTS vs. moderate-CTS, unilateral CTS vs. bilateral CTS; p = 0.11, p = 0.54, p = 0.22, respectively). Themean PSQI of patient group was higher than control group (7.81 ± 3.97 vs. 3.66 ± 2.08, p=0.000). While PSQI values were significantlydifferent (p= 0.03) between unilateral-CTS and bilateral-CTS patients, no significant difference was observed in Boston-SSS, BostonFSS, and total Boston values (p= 0.51, p= 0.29, p= 0.34 respectively). There was no significant difference between patients with mildCTS and those with moderate-CTS in terms of PSQI, Boston-FSS, Boston-SSS, and total Boston values (p= 0.61, p= 0.54, p= 0.62, andp= 0.53 respectively). There was a positive correlation between PSQI and Boston-SSS, Boston-FSS, and total Boston values (p

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KARAAHMET, Ö. Z., AKYÜZ, M., KARATAŞ, G., KÜTÜK, Ö., YALÇIN, E. (2022). The effects of carpal tunnel syndrome on sleep quality. Annals of Medical Research, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 1, 381–387. https://ajindex.com/articles/446533

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (17)

  1. Hadler NM. Nerve entrapment syndromes. In: McCarty DJ, Kopman WJ (Editors). Arthritis and allied conditions. Lea and Febiger: Philadelphia, 1993;1619- 24
  2. Werner RA, Andary M. Carpal tunnel syndrome: pathophysiology and clinical neurophysiology. Clin Neurophysiol 2002;113:1373-81
  3. Gao Y, Weng C, Wang X. Changes in nerve microcirculation following peripheral nerve compression. Neural Regen Res 2013;8:1041-7
  4. Umay E, Karaahmet ZÖ, Avluk Ö, et al. Karpal Tünel Sendromlu Hastalarda Kompresyonun Şiddeti ile Klinik Semptomlar, Fiziksel, Fonksiyonel ve Yaşam Kalitesi Bulgularının İlişkisi. Turk J Phys Med Rehab 2011;57:193-200
  5. AKYÜZ M, KARATAŞ G. Üst Ekstremite Tuzak Nöropatilerinde Elektrofizyolojik Değerlendirme. Turkiye Klinikleri Physical Medicine RehabilitationSpecial Topics 2019;12:46-57
  6. Wainner RS, Fritz JM, Irrgang JJ, et al. Development of a clinical prediction rule for the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005;86:609-18
  7. Katz JN, Larson MG, Sabra A, et al. The carpal tunnel syndrome: diagnostic utility of the history and physical examination findings. Ann Inter Med 1990;112:321-7
  8. Shapiro BE, Preston DC. Entrapment and compressive neuropathies. Med Clin North Am 2009;93:285-315
  9. Patel A, Culbertson MD, Patel A, et al. The negative effect of carpal tunnel syndrome on sleep quality. Sleep Disord 2014;2014:962746
  10. Cappuccio FP, D’Elia L, Strazzullo P, et al. Sleep duration and all-cause mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies. Sleep 2010;33:585-92
  11. Stevens JC. AAEM minimonograph: The electrodiagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. Muscle Nerve 1997;20:1477-86
  12. Phalen GS. Spontaneous compression of the median nerve at the wrist. J Am Med Assoc 1951;145:1128- 33
  13. Phalen GS. The Carpal-tunnel Syndrome: Clinical Evaluation of 598 Hands. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1972;83:29-40
  14. Stewart J, Eisen A. Tinel’s sign and the carpal tunnel syndrome. Br Med J 1978;2:1125-6
  15. Levine DW, Simmons BP, Koris MJ, et al. A selfadministered questionnaire for the assessment of severity of symptoms and functional status in carpal tunnel syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1993;75:1585- 92
  16. Sezgin M, İncel NA, Sevim S, et al. Assessment of symptom severity and functional status in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome: reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Boston Questionnaire. Disabil Rehabil 2006;28:1281-6
  17. Buysse DJ, Reynolds III CF, Monk TH, et al. The Pitt