Dergiler / Annals of Medical Research / 2020 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 6

Development, Validity and Reliability of the 4-point Likert Turkish version of Cognitive Failures Questionnaire

Sayfa
1650–1656
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Ouranalysis revealed a five factorial structure for CFQ, however previous literature with the 5-Likert version shows different factorstructures and does not indicate a dimensional stability.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Aim: Cognitive failures are suggested to be a transdiagnostic endophenotype that increases the vulnerability for psychiatricdisorders.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Despite its wide use in research and correlation with biological markers, CFQ is criticized forits unstable factorial structure among studies and 5-Likert structure that may lead to bias for neutral answers.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Ouranalysis revealed a five factorial structure for CFQ, however previous literature with the 5-Likert version shows different factorstructures and does not indicate a dimensional stability.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Aim: Cognitive failures are suggested to be a transdiagnostic endophenotype that increases the vulnerability for psychiatricdisorders. Broadbent’s Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (CFQ), is among the most widely used scales to assess cognitive functionobserved in an ecological manner. Despite its wide use in research and correlation with biological markers, CFQ is criticized forits unstable factorial structure among studies and 5-Likert structure that may lead to bias for neutral answers. Here we aimed todevelop a 4-Likert Turkish version of CFQ, search its validity, reliability and factorial structure.Material and Methods: CFQ has been translated to Turkish in two steps. CFQ, Perceived Deficit Questionnaire-D (PDQ-D), BeckDepression Inventory (BDI) and Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) were applied to 272 participants (187 healthy controls, 55 patientsdiagnosed with depression, 30 patients diagnosed with anxiety disorder).Results: The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of 4-Likert Turkish version of CFQ was found as 0.91. Principal component analysisextracted five factors and explained 53.7 % of total variance. CFQ scores were significantly different among groups. Both depressiveand anxious groups reported higher CFQ scores compared to controls. CFQ significantly and strongly correlated with PDQ-D andshowed a moderate correlation with BDI and BAI.Conclusion: 4-Likert Turkish version of CFQ is a valid and reliable tool to assess cognitive failures in non-demented groups. Ouranalysis revealed a five factorial structure for CFQ, however previous literature with the 5-Likert version shows different factorstructures and does not indicate a dimensional stability.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ESER, H. Y., AYDEMİR, Ö., İNAN, M. Y., KILIÇ, Ö., ERCAN, C., KÜÇÜKER, M. U., KILIÇSIZ, C. M., YILMAZ, S., DİNÇER, N. (2022). Development, Validity and Reliability of the 4-point Likert Turkish version of Cognitive Failures Questionnaire. Annals of Medical Research, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 6, 1650–1656. https://ajindex.com/articles/446502

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (15)

  1. Millan MJ, Agid Y, Brune M, et al. Cognitive dysfunction in psychiatric disorders: characteristics, causes and the quest for improved therapy. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2012;11:141-68
  2. Saleh A, Potter GG, McQuoid DR, et al. Effects of early life stress on depression, cognitive performance and brain morphology. Psychol Med 2017;47:171-81
  3. Broadbent DE, Cooper PF, FitzGerald P, et al.The Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (CFQ) and its correlates. Br J Clin Psychol 1982;21:1-16
  4. Carrigan N, Barkus E. A systematic review of cognitive failures in daily life: Healthy populations. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2016;63:29-42
  5. Klumb PL. Cognitive failures and performance differences: validation studies of a German version of the cognitive failures questionnaire. Ergonomics 1995;38:1456-67. 6. de Paula JJ, Costa DS, Miranda DM, et al. Brazilian version of the Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (CFQ): cross-cultural adaptation and evidence of validity and reliability. Braz J Psychiatry 2018;40:312-5
  6. Sandberg K, Blicher JU, Dong MY, et al.Occipital GABA correlates with cognitive failures in daily life. Neuroimage 2014;87:55-60
  7. Markett S, Montag C, Diekmann C, et al. A molecular genetic approach to everyday cognitive failure. Neurosci Lett 2014;566:216-20
  8. Boomsma DI. Genetic analysis of cognitive failures (CFQ): A study of Dutch adolescent twins and their parents. Eur J Personality 1998;12:321-30
  9. Maaijwee NA, Schaapsmeerders P, Rutten-Jacobs LC, et al. Subjective cognitive failures after stroke in young adults: prevalent but not related to cognitive impairment. J Neurol 2014;261:1300-8
  10. Carrigan N, Barkus E. A systematic review of the relationship between psychological disorders or substance use and self-reported cognitive failures. Cogn Neuropsychiatry 2016;21:539-64
  11. Mecacci L, Righi S, Rocchetti G. Cognitive failures and circadian typology. Pers Indiv Differ 2004;37:107-13
  12. Matthews G, Coyle K, Craig A. Multiple Factors of Cognitive Failure and Their Relationships with Stress Vulnerability. J Psychopathol Behav 1990;12:49-65
  13. Larsen GE, Alderton DL, Neideffer M, Underhill E. Further evidence on dimensionality and correlates of the cognitive failures questionnaire. Brit J Psychol 1997;88:354
  14. Wallace JC. Confirmatory factor analysis of the cognitive failures questionnaire: evidence for dimensionality and construct validity. Pers Indiv Differ 2004;37:307-24
  15. Lam RW, Lamy FX, Danchenko N, et al.Psychometric validation of the Perce