KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Annals of Medical Research / 2020 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 11

Effective treatment and good cosmetic results in the treatment of pilonidal sinus disease; Comparison of four surgical methods

Remzi AKTÜRK
Serdar SERİNÖZ
Sayfa
2834–2840
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The longest time of healing was in the ESH group (49.62 ± 12.7 days)(p

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Aim: In the treatment of pilonidal sinus disease (PSD), the patient wishes to be able to get rid of the disease quickly and effectivelywith the ideal treatment, which not only improves the patient's satisfaction with the best cosmetic result but also has a low recurrencerate.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The aim of this study is to demonstrate that the gluteal sliding transposition (GST) method is more advantageous and preferredby patients in terms of better cosmetic results and lower loss with lower recurrence and complication rates.Materials and Methods: Between 2008 and 2017, patients who were operated for PSD were retrospectively reviewed usinghospital digital records.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The longest time of healing was in the ESH group (49.62 ± 12.7 days)(p
🔬Tür:Literatür & Derleme Çalışması
📍Kapsam:2008 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Aim: In the treatment of pilonidal sinus disease (PSD), the patient wishes to be able to get rid of the disease quickly and effectivelywith the ideal treatment, which not only improves the patient's satisfaction with the best cosmetic result but also has a low recurrencerate. The aim of this study is to demonstrate that the gluteal sliding transposition (GST) method is more advantageous and preferredby patients in terms of better cosmetic results and lower loss with lower recurrence and complication rates.Materials and Methods: Between 2008 and 2017, patients who were operated for PSD were retrospectively reviewed usinghospital digital records. Four groups of patients were included in the study: those who underwent excision and secondary healing(ESH), excision and primary repair (EPR), GST, and Limberg flap transposition (LFT). The groups were compared based on time ofhospitalization, time of healing, time of labor loss, infection, hematoma, seroma and wound dehiscence, flap necrosis, paresthesia,recurrence and aesthetic satisfaction.Results: Between 2008 and 2017, 1526 patients underwent PSD surgery in the hospital. Of the patients, 276 were female and 1250were male, and their median age was 21.3 (16-45) years. The mean follow-up was 24 months (6-120 months). The longest meanoperation time (46.04 ± 9.1 min) was found in LFT patients. The longest time of healing was in the ESH group (49.62 ± 12.7 days)(p

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

AKTÜRK, R., SERİNÖZ, S. (2022). Effective treatment and good cosmetic results in the treatment of pilonidal sinus disease; Comparison of four surgical methods. Annals of Medical Research, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 11, 2834–2840. https://ajindex.com/articles/446489

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (18)

  1. Harris C, Sibbald RG, Mufti A, et al. Pilonidal sinus disease: 10 steps to optimize care. Adv Skin Wound Care 2016;29:469-78
  2. Tavassoli A, Noorshafiee S, Nazarzadeh R. Comparison of excision with primary repair versus Limberg flap. Int J Surg 2011;9:343-6
  3. Sondenaa K, Andersen E, Nesvik I, et al. Patient characteristics and symptoms in chronic pilonidal sinus disease. Int J Colorectal Dis 1995;10:39-42
  4. Humphries AE, Duncan JE. Evaluation and management of the pilonidal disease. Surg Clin North Am 2010;90:113-24
  5. Harlak A, Mentes O, Kilic S, et al. Sacrococcygeal pilonidal disease: analysis of previously proposed risk factors. Clinics 2010;65:125-31
  6. Elalfy K, Emile S, Lotfy A, et al. Bilateral gluteal advancement flap for treatment of recurrent sacrococcygeal pilonidal disease: A prospective cohort study. Int J Surg 2016;29:1-8
  7. Cubukcu A, Carkman S, Gonullu NN, et al. Lack of evidence that obesity is a cause of pilonidal sinus disease. Eur J Surg 2001;167:297-8
  8. Dandin O, Tilhan D, Karakas DO, et al. A new surgical approach for pilonidal sinus disease: "deepithelialization technique''. Turk J Surg 2018;34:43- 8
  9. Daphan C, Tekelioglu MH, Sayilgan C. Limberg flap repair for pilonidal sinus disease. Dis Colon Rectum 2004;47:233-7
  10. Mentes BB, Leventoglu S, Cihan A, et al. Modified Limberg transposition flap for sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus. Surg Today 2004;34:419-23
  11. Karydakis GE. The new approach to the problem of pilonidal sinus. Lancet 1973;2:1414-5
  12. Ersoy OF, Karaca S, Kayaoglu HA, et al. Comparison of different surgical options in the treatment of pilonidal disease: a retrospective analysis of 175 patients. Kaohsiung J Med Sci 2007;23:67-70
  13. Kaya B, Eris C, Atalay S, et al. Modified Limberg transposition flap in the treatment of pilonidal sinus disease. Tech Coloproctol 2012;16:55-9
  14. Kapan M, Kapan S, Pekmezci S, et al. Sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus disease with Limberg flap repair. Tech Coloproctol 2002;6:27-32
  15. Petersen S, Aumann G, Kramer A, et al. Short-term results of Karydakis flap for pilonidal sinus disease. Tech Coloproctol 2007;11:235-40
  16. Spivak H, Brooks HL, Nussbaum M, et al. Treatment of chronic pilonidal sinus. Dis Colon Rectum 1996;39:1136-9
  17. Sondenaa K, Nesvik I, Andersen E, et al. Recurrent pilonidal sinus after excision with open or closed treatment: final result of a randomized trial. Eur J Surg 1996;162:237-40
  18. Limberg A. Design of local flaps. In: Gibson T, ed. Mode