KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Annals of Medical Research / 2020 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 5

Combinations of fixation methods for adolescent forearm diaphysis fractures

Murat GÜLCEK
Sayfa
1391–1396
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

All three methods may be used with success rates of 65-75%.Conclusions: The surgeon may choose intramedullary nail, plate-screw or their combination in accordance with the results of closedreduction maneuver in treatment of adolescent forearm double diaphysis fractures.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Aim: There is no consensus on treatment of forearm both bone diaphysis fractures in adolescents.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:In this study, we report the resultsof intramedullary fixation, plate-screw fixation, and combination of those methods in forearm fractures of adolescents.Material and Methods: A total of 62 patients that were surgically treated, and completed their treatments in 11-year period (2003-2014) were included in the study.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:All three methods may be used with success rates of 65-75%.Conclusions: The surgeon may choose intramedullary nail, plate-screw or their combination in accordance with the results of closedreduction maneuver in treatment of adolescent forearm double diaphysis fractures.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2003-2014 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Aim: There is no consensus on treatment of forearm both bone diaphysis fractures in adolescents. In this study, we report the resultsof intramedullary fixation, plate-screw fixation, and combination of those methods in forearm fractures of adolescents.Material and Methods: A total of 62 patients that were surgically treated, and completed their treatments in 11-year period (2003-2014) were included in the study. The forearm diaphysis double bone fracture was fixated with intramedullary nail in 23 adolescents.Both bones were fixated with plate-screw in 20 adolescents. In 19 patients, one bone was fixated with intramedullary nail, the otherwas fixated with plate-screw. Clinical results were graded in accordance with Price classification system.Results: Three treatment groups were similar for clinical success. All three methods may be used with success rates of 65-75%.Conclusions: The surgeon may choose intramedullary nail, plate-screw or their combination in accordance with the results of closedreduction maneuver in treatment of adolescent forearm double diaphysis fractures.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

GÜLCEK, M. (2022). Combinations of fixation methods for adolescent forearm diaphysis fractures. Annals of Medical Research, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 5, 1391–1396. https://ajindex.com/articles/446367

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (19)

  1. Cheng JC, Shen WY. Limb fracture pattern in different pediatric age groups: a study of 3,350 children. J Orthopaedic Trauma 1993;7:15-22
  2. Landin LA. Epidemiology of children's fractures. J Pediatr Orthop Part B 1997;6:79-83
  3. Vainionpaa S, Bostman O, Patiala H, et al. Internal fixation of forearm fractures in children. Acta Orthop Scand 1987;58:121-3
  4. Ortega R, Loder RT, Louis DS. Open reduction and internal fixation of forearm fractures in children. J Pediatr Orthop 1996;16:651-4
  5. Wyrsch B, Mencio GA, Green NE. Open reduction and internal fixation of pediatric forearm fractures.J Pediatr Orthop1996;16:644-50
  6. Lee S, Nicol RO, Stott NS. Intramedullary fixation for pediatric unstable forearm fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2002;402:245-50
  7. Rodriguez-Merchan EC. Pediatric fractures of the forearm. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005;432:65-72
  8. Flynn JM, Jones KJ, Garner MR, et al. Eleven years experience in the operative management of pediatric forearm fractures. J Pediatr Orthop 2010;30:313-9
  9. Flynn JM, Waters PM. Single-bone fixation of both-bone forearm fractures. J Pediatr Orthop 1996;16:655-9
  10. Luhmann SJ, Gordon JE, Schoenecker PL. Intramedullary fixation of unstable both-bone forearm fractures in children. J Pediatr Orthop1998;18:451-6
  11. Kirkos JM, Beslikas T, Kapras EA, et al. Surgical treatment of unstable diaphyseal both-bone forearm fractures in children with single fixation of the radius. Injury 2000;31:591-6
  12. Qidwai SA. Treatment of diaphyseal forearm fractures in children by intramedullary Kirschner wires. J Trauma 2001;50:303-7
  13. Sun YQ, Penna J, Haralabatos SS, et al. Intramedullary fixation of pediatric forearm diaphyseal fractures. Am J Orthop 2001;30:67-70
  14. Myers GJ, Gibbons PJ, Glithero PR. Nancy nailing of diaphyseal forearm fractures. Single bone fixation for fractures of both bones. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2004;86:581-4
  15. Schmittenbecher PP. State-of-the-art treatment of forearm shaft fractures. Injury 2005;36:25-34
  16. Noonan KJ, Price CT. Forearm and distal radius fractures in children. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 1998;6:146-56
  17. Zionts LE, Zalavras CG, Gerhardt MB. Closed treatment of displaced diaphyseal both-bone forearm fractures in older children and adolescents. J Pediatr Orthop 2005;25:507-12
  18. Reinhardt KR, Feldman DS, Green DW, et al. Comparison of intramedullary nailing to plating for both-bone forearm fractures in older children. J Pediatr Orthop 2008;28:403-9
  19. Shah AS, Lesniak BP, W