After thermal aging whenthe bottom surface of Equia Forte compared to Activa Bioactive and Beautifil II in terms of microhardness values, a staticticalsignificant difference was observed (p
📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale
🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Aim: The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the thermal aging effect on microhardness and surface roughness of fluoridecontaining restorative materials.Material and Methods: In this study, a bioactive material (Activa Bioactive Restorative, Pulpdent, Watertown, MA, USA), a giomer(Beautifil II, Shofu, Kyoto, Japan), a nanohybrid composite (Charisma Smart, Heraeus Kulzer, Germany), a resin-modified glassionomer (Ionoseal, VOCO, Germany), and a bulk-fill glass-hybrid material (Equia Forte, GC, Tokyo, Japan) were used. 10×2 mm discswere prepared (n=10) and then polymerized.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:One-Way ANOVA test was used for the statistical analysis (p0.05).
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:After thermal aging whenthe bottom surface of Equia Forte compared to Activa Bioactive and Beautifil II in terms of microhardness values, a staticticalsignificant difference was observed (p
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri
Abstract
Aim: The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the thermal aging effect on microhardness and surface roughness of fluoridecontaining restorative materials.Material and Methods: In this study, a bioactive material (Activa Bioactive Restorative, Pulpdent, Watertown, MA, USA), a giomer(Beautifil II, Shofu, Kyoto, Japan), a nanohybrid composite (Charisma Smart, Heraeus Kulzer, Germany), a resin-modified glassionomer (Ionoseal, VOCO, Germany), and a bulk-fill glass-hybrid material (Equia Forte, GC, Tokyo, Japan) were used. 10×2 mm discswere prepared (n=10) and then polymerized. Only for bulk-fill glass-hybrid specimens, one layer of coat was applied on top surfacesand light cured. Before and after thermal aging procedures, initial and final surface roughness and microhardness values wereevaluated. One-Way ANOVA test was used for the statistical analysis (p0.05). After thermal aging whenthe bottom surface of Equia Forte compared to Activa Bioactive and Beautifil II in terms of microhardness values, a staticticalsignificant difference was observed (p
🔖
Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap
KAZAK, M., DONMEZ, N., KOYMEN, S. S., KOYMEN, R., TEKDEMİR, K. (2022). Effect of thermal aging procedure on the microhardness and surface roughness of fluoride containing materials. Annals of Medical Research, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 3, 889–894. https://ajindex.com/articles/446321
Can G, Kalayci S, Kaplan R. An investigation of fluoride release of three different composite in artificial saliva. J Dent Fac Ankara Uni 2006;33:33-8
Yip HK, Smales RJ. Fluoride release from a polyacidmodified resin composite and 3 resin modified glass ionomer materials. Quint Int 2000;31:261-6
Bertacxhini SM, Abate PF, Blank A, et al. Solubilty and fluoride release in ionomers and compomers. Quint Int 1999;30:193-7
Featherstone JD. The science and practice of caries prevention. J Am Dent Assoc 2000;131:887-99
Francci C, Deaton TG, Arnold RR, et al. Fluoride release from restorative materials and its effects on dentin demineralization. J Dent Res 1999;78:1647-54
Globler SR, Rossouw JR, Van Wykotze TJ. A comparison of fluoride release from various dental materials. J Dent 1998;26:259-65
Gonulol N, Yilmaz F. The effects of finishing and polishing techniques on surface roughness and color stability of nanocomposites. J Dent 2012;40:64-70
Valentini F, Oliveira SG, Guimaraes GZ, et al. Effect of surface sealant on the color stability of composite resin restorations. Braz Dent J 2011;22:365-68
Willems G, Celis JP, Lambrechts P, et al. Hardness and young's modulus determined by nanoindentation technique of filler particles of dental restorative materials compared with human enamel. J Biomed Mater Res 1993;27:747-55
Sonugelen M, Artunc C, Gungor MA. Examination of wear and hardness in esthetic restorative materials polymerized by different methods. J Dent Fac Ege Uni 2000;21:1-10
Korkmaz Y, Ozel E, Attar N, et al. The influence of onestep polishing systems on the surface roughness and microhardness of nanocomposites. Oper Dent 2008;33:44-50
Gale MS, Darvell B. Thermal cycling procedures for laboratory testing of dental restorations. J Dent 1999;27:89-99
Tekbas Atay M, Oguz Ahmet BS, Sayin Ozel G. The impotance of thermal and loading cycles in terms of simulation of the oral cavity. J Dent Fac Ataturk Uni 2016;14:88-93
Lee YK, Lu H, Oguri M, et al. Changes in gloss after simulated generalized wear of composite resin. J Prosthet Dent 2005;94:370-76
Paravina RD, Ontiveros JC, Powers JM. Accelerated aging effects on color and translucency of bleachingshade composites. J Esthet Restor Dent 2006;16:117- 26
Erdilek D, Dorter C, Koray F, et al. Effect of thermomechanical load cycling on microleakage in Class II ormocer restorations. Eur J Dent 2009;3:200- 05