Dergiler / Annals of Medical Research / 2021 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 4

Vacuum-assisted breast biopsy of microcalcificationson the stereotactic prone table and comparison of thehistopathologic diagnosis with mammographic features

Sayfa
668–673
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

In 10 of these (16.3%) the final excisional histopathologicaldiagnosis was benign, and in 51 (83.7%) malignancy was determined.Conclusion: Vacuum-assisted breast biopsy on a stereotactic prone table is a successful technique with a low failure rate formicrocalcifications that are non-palpable and have no ultrasonographic findings.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Aim: Breast cancer is one of the most important causes of mortality and morbidity in women.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Therefore, the use of vacuum-assistedbreast biopsy in the management of breast lesions continues to increase.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:In 10 of these (16.3%) the final excisional histopathologicaldiagnosis was benign, and in 51 (83.7%) malignancy was determined.Conclusion: Vacuum-assisted breast biopsy on a stereotactic prone table is a successful technique with a low failure rate formicrocalcifications that are non-palpable and have no ultrasonographic findings.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2010 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Aim: Breast cancer is one of the most important causes of mortality and morbidity in women. With the widespread use of screeningmammography, the detection of non-palpable suspected cancerous lesions is increasing. Therefore, the use of vacuum-assistedbreast biopsy in the management of breast lesions continues to increase. The aim of this study was to evaluate the histopathologicalresults of suspicious microcalcifications which were diagnosed by vacuum-assisted needle biopsy on a stereotactic prone table andto compare the mammographic features of the microcalcifications with the histopathological results.Materials and Methods: The study included a total of 119 patients with a median age of 51 years (range, 33-77 years) who underwentstereotactic biopsy on a prone table because of suspicious microcalcifications between March 2010 and July 2014. Retrospectiveevaluation was made of the preoperative mammographic features, and the BI-RADS (Breast imaging-reporting and data system)scores of the microcalcifications and the vacuum biopsy and / or excisional histopathological results.Results: Stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy revealed that 52.1% of the lesions were benign and 47.9% were malignant. Aftervacuum-assisted stereotactic biopsy 61 patients underwent surgery. In 10 of these (16.3%) the final excisional histopathologicaldiagnosis was benign, and in 51 (83.7%) malignancy was determined.Conclusion: Vacuum-assisted breast biopsy on a stereotactic prone table is a successful technique with a low failure rate formicrocalcifications that are non-palpable and have no ultrasonographic findings.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

YILDIZ, V. A., TAYDAS, O., DEMİRKAZIK, F. B., AKPINAR, M. G. (2022). Vacuum-assisted breast biopsy of microcalcificationson the stereotactic prone table and comparison of thehistopathologic diagnosis with mammographic features. Annals of Medical Research, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 4, 668–673. https://ajindex.com/articles/445691

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (16)

  1. Taydas O, Durhan G, Akpinar MG, et al. Comparison of MRI and US in Tumor Size Evaluation of Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy. Eur J Breast Health 2019;15:119-24
  2. Guarneri V, Conte PF. The curability of breast cancer and the treatment of advanced disease. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2004;31:149-61
  3. Hortobagyi GN, de la Garza Salazar J, Pritchard K, et al. The global breast cancer burden: variations in epidemiology and survival. Clin Breast Cancer 2005;6:391-401
  4. Fajardo LL. Cost-effectiveness of stereotaxic breast core needle biopsy. Acad Radiol 1996;3:21-3
  5. Burbank F. Mammographic findings after 14-gauge automated needle and 14-gauge directional, vacuumassisted stereotactic breast biopsies. Radiology 1997;204:153-6
  6. Gumus H, Gumus M, Devalia H, et al. Causes of failure in removing calcium in microcalcification-only lesions using 11-gauge stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy. Diagn Interv Radiol 2012;18:354-9
  7. Lee CH, Egglin TK, Philpotts L, et al. Cost-effectiveness of stereotactic core needle biopsy: analysis by means of mammographic findings. Radiology 1997;202:849- 54
  8. Yim JH, Barton P, Weber B, et al. Mammographically detected breast cancer. Benefits of stereotactic core versus wire localization biopsy. Ann Surg 1996;223:688-97; discussion 97-700
  9. Lee SH, Jung YJ, Jung HJ, et al. Stereotactic vacuumassisted breast biopsy under lateral decubitus position. Ann Surg Treat Res 2016;90:16-20
  10. Tonegutti M, Girardi V. Stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy in 268 nonpalpable lesions. Radiol Med 2008;113:65-75
  11. Burak WE, Jr., Owens KE, Tighe MB, et al. Vacuumassisted stereotactic breast biopsy: histologic underestimation of malignant lesions. Arch Surg 2000;135:700-3
  12. Eby PR, Ochsner JE, DeMartini WB, et al. Is surgical excision necessary for focal atypical ductal hyperplasia found at stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy? Ann Surg Oncol 2008;15:3232-8
  13. Jackman RJ, Birdwell RL, Ikeda DM. Atypical ductal hyperplasia: can some lesions be defined as probably benign after stereotactic 11-gauge vacuum-assisted biopsy, eliminating the recommendation for surgical excision? Radiology 2002;224:548-54
  14. Kocjan G. Fine needle aspiration cytology. Cytopathology 2003;14:307-8
  15. Poellinger A, Bick U, Freund T, et al. Evaluation of 11-gauge and 9-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy systems in a breast parenchymal model. Acad Radiol 2007;14:677-84
  16. Schiaffino S, Massone E, Gristina