Dergiler / Annals of Medical Research / 2022 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 6

Forensic medical evaluation of nasal trauma cases

Sayfa
639–643
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Conclusion: We believe that it is more appropriate to give the final forensic report of cases with nasal trauma by a Forensic Medicine Specialist rather than Emergency Department physicians or an Otorhinolaryngologist.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Aim: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the cases for which a final report was made due to nasal trauma and to reveal the errors made in the diagnosis.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Materials and Methods: Among the forensic reports prepared in the Forensic Medicine Clinic of Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal University Training and Research Hospital between 2015-2019, cases with "a history of nasal trauma" were included in the study.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Conclusion: We believe that it is more appropriate to give the final forensic report of cases with nasal trauma by a Forensic Medicine Specialist rather than Emergency Department physicians or an Otorhinolaryngologist.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2015-2019 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Aim: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the cases for which a final report was made due to nasal trauma and to reveal the errors made in the diagnosis. Materials and Methods: Among the forensic reports prepared in the Forensic Medicine Clinic of Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal University Training and Research Hospital between 2015-2019, cases with "a history of nasal trauma" were included in the study. Results: In this study, 315 cases with a history of nasal trauma were included. Two hundred sixty-four (83.8%) of the cases were male and 51 (16.2%) are female. Two hundred thirty-one of the cases (73.3%) were injured as a result of the intentional blunt injuries. Before applying to the Forensic Medicine Clinic, 28 (8.9%) of the cases were evaluated only by physical examination, 46 (14.6%) by physical examination + direct radiography, 241 (76.5%) by physical examination + direct radiography + CT. It was evaluated that the report prepared by emergency department physicians on 203 cases (64.4%) was correct, whereas the report prepared on 112 (35.6%) cases was erroneous. It was evaluated that the reports prepared by Otorhinolaryngologists on 117 cases (80.1%) were correct, whereas the reports prepared on 29 (19.9%) cases were erroneous. Conclusion: We believe that it is more appropriate to give the final forensic report of cases with nasal trauma by a Forensic Medicine Specialist rather than Emergency Department physicians or an Otorhinolaryngologist.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

HÖSÜKLER, E., ERKOL, Z. Z., DİNÇER, G. (2022). Forensic medical evaluation of nasal trauma cases. Annals of Medical Research, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 6, 639–643. https://ajindex.com/articles/445658

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (15)

  1. Magalhães BM, Mays S, Santos AL. A new approach to record ing nasal fracture in skeletonized individuals. Int J Paleopathol. 2020;30:105–9
  2. Razikovna, RM. Forensic examination of fractures of the bones of the nose. European Science Review 2018;7-8:162–4
  3. Gharehdaghi J, Samadi Rad B, Ghatreh Samani V, et al. Com parison of physical examination and conventional radiography in diagnosis of nasal fracture. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013;65(Suppl 2):304–7
  4. Sener MT, Kok AN, Kara C, et al. Diagnosing isolated nasal fractures in the emergency department: are they missed or over diagnosed? Ten years experience of 535 forensic cases. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2014;40:715–9
  5. Emet M, Saritas A, Acemoglu H, et al. Predictors of missed injuries in hospitalized trauma patients in the emergency de partment. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2010;36(6):559–66
  6. Wang H, Song G, Ren W, et al. Traumatic Facial Fractures in Children and Adolescents. J Craniofac Surg. 2018;29:1809–12
  7. Byun IH, Lee WJ, Roh TS, et al. Demographic Factors of Nasal Bone Fractures and Social Reflection. J Craniofac Surg. 2020;31:169–71
  8. Karbeyaz K, Düzer S, Düzer S, et al. The Evaluation of Judicial Report Process of 1306 Patients with Nasal Fracture. Bull Leg Med. 2015;20:99–103 9. Sayın İ, Ekizoğlu O, Yazıcı ZM, et al. Evaluation of Nasal Fractures and Forensic Medicine Approach. Bull Leg Med. 2010;15:99–103
  9. Klinginsmith M, Katrib Z. Nasal Septal Fracture. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing, 2021. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK555912/ access date 05.12.2021
  10. Hwang K, Ki SJ, Ko SH. Etiology of Nasal Bone Fractures. J Craniofac Surg. 2017;28:785–8
  11. Kafadar H, Kafadar S. Investigation of Nasal Bone Fractures in the Framework of the Turkish Penal Code. Bull Leg Med 2014;18:20–4
  12. Baek HJ, Kim DW, Ryu JH, et al. Identification of Nasal Bone Fractures on Conventional Radiography and Facial CT: Com parison of the Diagnostic Accuracy in Different Imaging Modal ities and Analysis of Interobserver Reliability. Iran J Radiol. 2013;10:140–7
  13. Lee MH, Cha JG, Hong HS, et al. Comparison of high-resolution ultrasonography and computed tomography in the diagnosis of nasal fractures. J Ultrasound Med. 2009;28:717–23
  14. Hwang K, You SH, Kim SG, et al. Analysis of nasal bone fractures; a six-year study of 503 patients. J Craniofac Surg. 2006;17:261–4
  15. Pérez-Guisado J, Maclennan P. Clinical evaluation of the nose: a cheap an