Dergiler / Annals of Medical Research / 2022 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 2

The correlation between combined nasal and throat swab and chest CT findings in the diagnosis of COVID 19

Sayfa
99–102
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Especially in patients with incompatible RT-RCR and chest CT, the diagnosis should be strengthened by evaluating the laboratory findings and clinical symptoms of the patient.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Aim: COVID-19 has spread rapidly, caused a pandemic and become a serious public health problem all over the world.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The aim of the study is to investigate whether reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) method, the most commonly used method for the diagnosis of COVID-19, correlate with the chest CT findings.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Especially in patients with incompatible RT-RCR and chest CT, the diagnosis should be strengthened by evaluating the laboratory findings and clinical symptoms of the patient.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2020 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Aim: COVID-19 has spread rapidly, caused a pandemic and become a serious public health problem all over the world. The aim of the study is to investigate whether reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) method, the most commonly used method for the diagnosis of COVID-19, correlate with the chest CT findings. Material and Methods: The file records of the patients with COVID-19 and suspected COVID-19 were examined retrospectively between 11 March and 30 August 2020 after the approval of the local ethics committee. Patient files were divided into 2 groups. RT-PCR negative patients were in group 1 and RT-PCR positive patients were in group 2. Combined nose and throat swab (CNTS) was used for swab sampling. Results: Of the 492 patients included in the study, 277 were men and 215 were women, with an average age of 57.45 ± 19.83. While there were 81 (29.2%) patients with chest CT findings compatible with COVID-19 in the first group, there were 80 (37.2%) patients in the second group. While the number of patients whose chest CT findings were incompatible with COVID-19 was 196 (70.8%) in group 1, it was 135 (62.8%) in group 2. There was a poor agreement between chest CT and RT-PCR in diagnosing COVID-19 (p = 0.062). Conclusion: To diagnose the disease is the most important step in treatment management. Especially in patients with incompatible RT-RCR and chest CT, the diagnosis should be strengthened by evaluating the laboratory findings and clinical symptoms of the patient.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

TORUN, M. T., DURMAZ, D. (2022). The correlation between combined nasal and throat swab and chest CT findings in the diagnosis of COVID 19. Annals of Medical Research, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 2, 99–102. https://ajindex.com/articles/445581

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (15)

  1. Wang W, Xu Y, Gao R, et al. Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Different Types of Clinical Specimens. JAMA 2020;323(18):1843-1844
  2. Kokkinakis I, Selby K, Favrat B, et al. Covid-19 diagnosis:clinical recommendations and performance of nasopharyngeal swab-PCR. Rev MedSuisse 2020;16(689):699-701
  3. Fang Y, Zhang H, Xie J, et al. Sensitivity of Chest CT for COVID-19: Comparisonto RTPCR. Radiology 2020;296(2):115-117
  4. Long C, Xu H, Shen Q, et al. Diagnosis of the Coronavirus disease (COVID-19): rRT-PCR or CT? Eur J Radiol 2020;126:108961. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.108961
  5. Xie X, Zhong Z, Zhao W, et al. Chest CT fortypical 2019- nCoV pneumonia: relationship to negative RT-PCR testing. Radiology 2020;296(2):41- 45. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020200343
  6. Huang P, Liu T, Huang L, et al. Use of chest CT in combination with negative RT-PCR assay for the 2019 novel coronavirus but high clinical suspicion. Radiology 2020;295(1):22-23. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020200330
  7. Henry BM, de Oliveira MHS, Benoit S, et al. Hematologic, biochemical and immune biomarker abnormalities associated with severe illness and mortality in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): A meta-analysis. Clin Chem Lab Med 2020;25(7):1021-8. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2020-0369
  8. Fan BE, Chong VCL, Chan SSW, et al. Hematologic parameters in patients with COVID-19 infection. Am J Hematol 2020;95(6):131-4. doi: 10.1002/ajh.25774
  9. Zhang L, Yan X, Fan Q, et al. D-dimer levels on admission to predict in-hospital mortality in patients with Covid-19. J Thromb Haemost 2020;18(6):1324-9. doi:10.1111/jth.14859
  10. Prokop M, vanEverdingen W, vanReesVellinga T, et al. CO-RADS: A Categorical CT Assessment Scheme for Patients Suspected of Having COVID-19-Definition and Evaluation. Radiology 2020;296(2):97-104
  11. Udugama B, Kadhiresan P, Kozlowski HN, et al. Diagnosing COVID-19: The Disease and Tools for Detection. ACS Nano 2020;14(4):3822-3835
  12. Pascarella G, Strumia A, Piliego C, et al. COVID-19 diagnosis and management: a comprehensive review. J Intern Med 2020;288(2):192-206
  13. Druce J, Garcia K, Tran T, et al. Evaluation of swabs, transport media, and specimen transport conditions for optimal detection of viruses by PCR. J Clin Microbiol 2012;50:1064-5. doi: 10.1128/JCM.06551-11
  14. Lauer SA, Grantz KH, Bi Q, et al. The incubation period of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) from publicly reported confirmed cases: estimation and application. Ann Int Med 2020;172(9):577-582
  15. Pan Y, Zhang D, Yang P, et