KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi / 2008 / Volume: 55 Issue: 2

Chemical and microbiological quality of donkey milk

Hakan TAVŞANLI
Mukadderat GÖKMEN
Adem ÖNEN
Sayfa
243–248
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Statistical differences were observed between farms in terms of both fat and lactose values and microbiological parameters (P

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The aim of this study was to investigate the chemical and microbiological quality of raw milk samples collected from clinically healthy appearance donkeys, which raised in two different donkey farminBalıkesirprovinceofTurkey.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:In this study, a total of 78 raw milk samples collected from 26 donkeys.The average dry matter, protein, fat and lactose value of raw donkey milk samples in farm 1 and 2 was determined as 8.89%, 8.79%; 1.57% and 1.47%; 0.70%, 0.45%, 6.48% and 6.06%, respectively.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Statistical differences were observed between farms in terms of both fat and lactose values and microbiological parameters (P
🔬Tür:Laboratuvar & Saha Deneyi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the chemical and microbiological quality of raw milk samples collected from clinically healthy appearance donkeys, which raised in two different donkey farminBalıkesirprovinceofTurkey. In this study, a total of 78 raw milk samples collected from 26 donkeys.The average dry matter, protein, fat and lactose value of raw donkey milk samples in farm 1 and 2 was determined as 8.89%, 8.79%; 1.57% and 1.47%; 0.70%, 0.45%, 6.48% and 6.06%, respectively. The average total aerobic mesophilic bacteria and somatic cell counts in farm 1 and 2 were found as 3.88 and 4.50 log CFU/mL, 3461 and 13000 cells/mL, respectively. The average counts of Staphylococcus-Micrococcusspp., coliform bacteria, Lactobacillusspp. and Lactococcusspp. in farm 1 and 2 were detected as 2.66 and 2.33 log CFU/mL, 1.5 and 1.7 log CFU/mL, 2.16 and 3.30, 4.32 and 5.12 log CFU/mL, respectively. Statistical differences were observed between farms in terms of both fat and lactose values and microbiological parameters (P

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

TAVŞANLI, H., GÖKMEN, M., ÖNEN, A. (2022). Chemical and microbiological quality of donkey milk. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, Volume: 55 Issue: 2, 243–248. https://ajindex.com/articles/444474

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (1)

  1. Aspri M, Bozoudi D, Tsaltas D, et al(2016): Raw donkey milk as a sourceof Enterococcus diversity: Assessment of their technological properties and safety characteristics.Food Control,73,81–90. 2.Auria ED, Mandelli M, Ballista P, et al(2011): Growth impairment and nutritional deficiencies in a cow's milk-allergic infant fedby unmodified donkey's milk.Case Rep Pediatr,2011,1–4. 3.Benkerroum N(2008): Antimicrobial activity of lysozyme with special relevance to milk.Afr J Biotechnol,7,4856–4867. 4.Carminati D, Tidona F, Fornasari ME, et al(2014): Biotyping of cultivable lactic acid bacteria isolated from donkey milk.Lett Appl Microbiol, 59,299–305. 5.Cavallarin L, Giribaldi M, SotoDel Rio MD, et al(2015): A survey on the milk chemical and microbiological quality in dairy donkey farms located in NorthWestern Italy.Food Control, 50,230–235. 6.Chandrashekar KM, Sharada R, Isloor S, et al(2018): Microbial Profile and Antimicrobial Effect of Donkey Milk against Staphylococcus aureus.Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci, 7, 3237-3242. 7.Chiavari C, Coloretti F, Nanni M, et al(2005): Use of donkey's milk for a fermented beverage with lactobacilli.Le Lait, 85,481–490. 8.Claeys WL, Verraes C, Cardoen S, et al(2014): Consumption of raw or heated milk from different species: An evaluation of the nutritional and potential health benefits.Food Control, 42,188–201. 9.Colavita G, Amadoro C, Salimei E(2011): Latte di asina: aspetti igienico-sanitari e normativi.Argoment, 3,61–70. 10.Csapo J, Stefler J, Martin TG, et al(1995): Composition of mares' colostrum and milk. Fat content, fatty acid composition and vitamin content.Int Dairy J, 5,393–402. 11.Fantuz F, Ferraro S, Todini L, et al(2012): Donkey milk concentration of calcium, phosphorus, potassium, sodium and magnesium.Int Dairy J, 24,143–145. 12.Fantuz F, Vincenzetti S, Polidori P, et al(2001): Study on the Protein Fractions of Donkey Milk.635–637. In: Proceedings of 14thCongress ASPA, Firenze, Italy. 13.Franciosi E, Settanni L, Cavazza A, et al(2009): Biodiversity and technological potential of wild lactic acid bacteria fromraw cows' milk.Int Dairy J,19,3–11. 14.Harmon RJ(1994): Physiology of mastitis and factors affecting somatic cell counts. J Dairy Sci, 77,2103–2112. 15.Hegde R, Isloor S, Prabhu K N, et al.(2013): Incidence of subclinical mastitis and prevalence of major mastitis pathogens in organized farms and unorganized sectors.Indian J Microbiol, 53,315–320. 16.Lievaart JJ, Barkema HW, Kremer WDJ, et al(2007): Effect o