KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Anatomy / 2019 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 2

Retrospective radiologic analysis of accessory spleen by computed tomography

Sinem AKKAŞOĞLU
Emre Can ÇELEBİOĞLU
Selma ÇALIŞKAN
ibrahim Tanzer SANCAK
Dergi
Anatomy
Sayfa
87–91
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Most and least common locations of this variation should be well known to prevent radiologic misdiagnosis and surgical complications.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:: The aim of this study was to define the incidence and classify locations of accessory spleen using CT in a largeTurkish population and to compare our findings with earlier studies performed in other populations.Methods: A total of 930 patients were included in the study and evaluated retrospectively using CT.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The CT images wereobtained using Philips Ingenuity 128 slice computerized tomography device.Results: 930 patients (413 females, 44.4%; 517 males, 55.6%) who underwent CT imaging for various indications were included in this study.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Most and least common locations of this variation should be well known to prevent radiologic misdiagnosis and surgical complications.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

: The aim of this study was to define the incidence and classify locations of accessory spleen using CT in a largeTurkish population and to compare our findings with earlier studies performed in other populations.Methods: A total of 930 patients were included in the study and evaluated retrospectively using CT. The CT images wereobtained using Philips Ingenuity 128 slice computerized tomography device.Results: 930 patients (413 females, 44.4%; 517 males, 55.6%) who underwent CT imaging for various indications were included in this study. Out of these, 55 had an accessory spleen (5.9%), and four had polysplenia. Most common location of accessory spleen was hilum (49.9%) followed by the gastrosplenic ligament (21.81%), infrasplenic area (18.18%), pancreatic tail(3.64%), splenorenal ligament (3.64%) and suprasplenic area (3.64%).Conclusion: Accessory spleen is a common variation encountered in the abdominal cavity. Most and least common locations of this variation should be well known to prevent radiologic misdiagnosis and surgical complications.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

AKKAŞOĞLU, S., ÇELEBİOĞLU, E. C., ÇALIŞKAN, S., SANCAK, I. T. (2022). Retrospective radiologic analysis of accessory spleen by computed tomography. Anatomy, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 2, 87–91. https://ajindex.com/articles/439444

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (18)

  1. Arkuszewski P, Srebrzynski A, Niedzialek L, Kuzdak K. Accessory spleen – incidence, localization and clinical significance. Polski Przeglàd Chirurgiczny 2010;82:510–4
  2. Chowdhary R, Raichandani L, Kataria S, Raichandani S, Joya H, Gaur S. Accessory spleen and its significance: A case report. International Journal of Applied Research 2015;1:902–4
  3. Depypere L, Goethals M, Janssen A, Olivie F. Traumatic rupture of splenic tissue 13 years after splenectomy. A case report. Acta Chir Belg 2009;109:523–6
  4. Richard D, Rice WT, Fremont MD. Splenosis: a review. South Med J 2007;100:589–93
  5. Mohammadi S, Hedjazi A, Sajjadian M, Ghrobi N, Moghadam MD, Mohammadi M. Accessory spleen in the splenic hilum: a cadaveric study with clinical significance. Med Arch 2016;70:389–91
  6. Robertson RF. The clinical importance of accessory spleens. Can Med Assoc J 1938;39: 222–5
  7. Schoenwolf G, Bleyl S, Brauer P, Francis-West P. Larsen’s human embryology, 5th ed. Philadelphia (PA): Elsevier Churchill Livingstone; 2015. p. 356
  8. Moore KL, Persaud TVN, Torchia MG. The developing human. Clinically oriented embryology 9th ed. Philadelphia (PA): Elsevier Saunders; 2013. p. 227
  9. Standring S. Grays Anatomy: the anatomical basis of clinical practice, 40th ed. Edinburgh (Scotland): Elsevier Churchill Livingstone; 2008. p. 1191
  10. Bergman RA, Heidger PM, Scott-Conner CEH. Anatomy of the spleen. In: Bowdler AJ, editor. The complete spleen. Totowa: Humana Press; 2002. p. 3
  11. Gayer G, Zissin R, Apter S, Atar E, Portnoy O, Itzchak Y. CT findings in congenital anomalies of the spleen. Br J Radiol 2001; 74:767–72
  12. Ambriz P, Muñóz R, Quintanar E, Sigler L, Avilés A, Pizzuto J. Accessory spleen compromising response to splenectomy for idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura. Radiology 1985;155:793–6
  13. Sutherland GA, Burghard FF. The treatment of splenic anemia by splenectomy. Proc R Soc Med 1911;4:58–70
  14. Shan GD, Chen WG, Hu FL, Chen LH, Yu JH, Zhu HT, Gao QQ, Xu GQ. A spontaneous hematoma arising within an intrapancreatic accessory spleen: a case report and literature review. Medicine (Baltimore) 2017;96:e8092
  15. Sirinek KR, Livingston CD, Bova JG, Levine BA. Bowel obstruction due to infarcted splenosis. South Med J 1984;77:764–7
  16. Calin B, Sebastin BN, Vasile B, Andrea O. Lost and found: the accessory spleen. Med Con 2012;2:63–6
  17. Snell R. Clinical anatomy by regions. 9th ed. Philadelphia (PA): Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2012. p. 206
  18. Mortele KJ, Mor