Dergiler / Anatomy / 2019 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 3

A quantitative evaluation of the academicians in anatomy departments of medical schools in Turkey

Dergi
Anatomy
Sayfa
193–199
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

It is concluded that this situation may have disadvantages for anatomy education and academic studies of academicians.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objectives: This study aimed to make a quantitative evaluation of the academicians working in anatomy education, investigate the relationship between the number of academicians and the anatomy course hours, and examine the relationshipbetween the ages of the schools and the number of academicians in medical schools in Turkey.Methods: The number of academicians (professor, associate professor, assistant professor, research assistant and lecturer) working at the department of anatomy were recorded by examining the official websites of 90 medical schools in Turkey betweenJune 22–27, 2019.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The number of anatomy course hours was examined in 58 medical schools accessed from their websites.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:It is concluded that this situation may have disadvantages for anatomy education and academic studies of academicians.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2019 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to make a quantitative evaluation of the academicians working in anatomy education, investigate the relationship between the number of academicians and the anatomy course hours, and examine the relationshipbetween the ages of the schools and the number of academicians in medical schools in Turkey.Methods: The number of academicians (professor, associate professor, assistant professor, research assistant and lecturer) working at the department of anatomy were recorded by examining the official websites of 90 medical schools in Turkey betweenJune 22–27, 2019. The number of anatomy course hours was examined in 58 medical schools accessed from their websites. Theyears of establishment of the medical schools were recorded.Results: A total of 90 research assistants, 18 lecturers and 291 faculty members were determined to work in the anatomydepartments of the 90 medical schools in Turkey. The mean numbers of research assistants, lecturers, faculty members andacademicians per faculty were found as 1±1.56 (range: 0–9), 0.20±0.45 (range: 0–2), 3.23±2.41 (range: 0–11) and 4.43±3.45 (range: 0–17), respectively. The mean numbers of theoretical, practical and total hours of anatomy course were170.14±32.25 (range: 100–245), 104.47±34.78 (range: 32–196), and 274.6±51.92 (range: 132–405), respectively.Conclusion: There were differences between universities in terms of academicians and anatomy course hours. The courseload of anatomy academicians was found rather high. It is concluded that this situation may have disadvantages for anatomy education and academic studies of academicians.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ADANIR, S. S., BAHŞİ, İ., ORHAN, M., KERVANCIOĞLU, P., CİHAN, Ö. F. (2022). A quantitative evaluation of the academicians in anatomy departments of medical schools in Turkey. Anatomy, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 3, 193–199. https://ajindex.com/articles/439443

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (11)

  1. Çetkin M, Turhan B, Bahfli ‹, Kervanc›o¤lu P. The opinions of medicine faculty students about anatomy education. Gaziantep Med J 2016;22:82–8
  2. Ankara Üniversitesi T›p Fakültesi dönem I ve dönem II ders program›. [Internet]. [Retrieved on September 12, 2019]. Available from: http://www.medicine.ankara.edu.tr/donem-i/, http://www.medicine. ankara.edu.tr/donem-ii/
  3. Ege Üniversitesi T›p Fakültesi ders program›. [Internet]. [Retrieved on September 12, 2019]. Available from:
  4. Gaziantep Üniversitesi T›p Fakültesi Ders Program›. [Internet]. [Retrieved on September 12, 2019]. Available from:
  5. Resmi Gazete 2547 say›l› yüksekö¤retim kanunu. [Internet]. [Retrieved on September 11, 2019]. Available from: http://www. mevzuat.gov.tr/MevzuatMetin/1.5.2547.pdf
  6. Moore KL, Dalley AF, Agur AMR. Clinically oriented anatomy. 8th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins; 2017. p. 15
  7. McCuskey RS, Carmichael SW, Kirch DG. The importance of anatomy in health professions education and the shortage of qualified educators. Acad Med 2005;80:349–51
  8. Özer M. Türkiye’de yüksekö¤retimde büyüme ve ö¤retim üyesi arz›. Yüksekö¤retim ve Bilim Dergisi 2011;1:23–6. 9. 2019 Yüksekö¤retim programlar› ve kontenjanlar› k›lavuzu. [Internet]. [Retrieved on September 13, 2019]. Available from: https://www.osym.gov.tr/TR,16858/2019-yuksekogretim-programlari-ve-kontenjanlari-kilavuzu.html. 10. 2018 Yüksekö¤retim programlar› ve kontenjanlar› k›lavuzu. [Internet]. [Retrieved on September 13, 2019]. Available from: https://www.osym.gov.tr/TR,15240/2018-yuksekogretim-programlari-ve-kontenjanlari-kilavuzu.html. 11. 2017 ÖSYS yüksek ö¤retim programlar› ve kontenjanlar› k›lavuzu. [Internet]. [Retrieved on September 13, 2019]. Available from:
  9. Özo¤lu, M. Statükodan de¤iflime: 21. yüzy›l›n bafl›nda yüksekö¤retim. In: B. S. Gür, editor. 2000'li y›llar: Türkiye'de e¤itim. ‹stanbul: Meydan Yay›nc›l›k; 2011. p. 125–161
  10. Uygur R, Ça¤lar V, Topçu B, Aktafl S, Özen OA. The assessment of the students’ opinions about anatomy education. Int J Basic Clin Med 2013;1:94–106
  11. Bahfli ‹, Çetkin M, Kervanc›o¤lu P, Orhan M, Ayan H, Say›n S. T›p fakültesi derslerinin verimlili¤i, ifllenifl flekli ve ö¤rencilerin devam kontrolünün de¤erlendirilmesi. Genel T›p Derg