KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Alphanumeric Journal / 2019 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2

Analysis of the Relationship between Real Effective Exchange Rate, Common Equity Tier 1 Ratio and Return on Equity: Evidence from Turkey

Burcu KIRAN BAYGIN
Esra N. KILCI
Sayfa
319–332
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The resultsindicate that there is only a long run relationship between real effective exchange rate and return on equity for Turkish BankingSector with structural breaks.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The analysis of the relationship between exchange rate fluctuations, common equity and return on equity is of high importanceto be able to improve adequate policies with the purpose of maintaining stability in foreign exchange rate, when it is taken intoconsideration that mentioned fluctuations lead to the loss in bank capital and profitability.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The objective of this study is to investigate the relationship betweenreal effective exchange rate, common equity and return on equity in the period of 2014:01 - 2018:09.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The resultsindicate that there is only a long run relationship between real effective exchange rate and return on equity for Turkish BankingSector with structural breaks.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2014 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

The analysis of the relationship between exchange rate fluctuations, common equity and return on equity is of high importanceto be able to improve adequate policies with the purpose of maintaining stability in foreign exchange rate, when it is taken intoconsideration that mentioned fluctuations lead to the loss in bank capital and profitability. Hence, the studies in the relatedliterature have been increasing in great amount recently. The objective of this study is to investigate the relationship betweenreal effective exchange rate, common equity and return on equity in the period of 2014:01 - 2018:09. The unit root properties ofthe series are tested by using Carrion-i Silvestre et al.(2009) unit root test and the cointegration relationship between the seriesis investigated by employing Maki(2012) cointegration test. Both tests take into account multiple structural breaks. The resultsindicate that there is only a long run relationship between real effective exchange rate and return on equity for Turkish BankingSector with structural breaks.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

BAYGIN, B. K., KILCI, E. N. (2022). Analysis of the Relationship between Real Effective Exchange Rate, Common Equity Tier 1 Ratio and Return on Equity: Evidence from Turkey. Alphanumeric Journal, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2, 319–332. https://ajindex.com/articles/435103

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. Abba, G.O., Zachariah, P. and Inyang, E.E., 2013, Capital Adequacy Ratio and Banking Risks in the Nigeria Money Deposit Banks. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting 4 (17), 17-25.
  2. Aburime, T., 2008, Determinants of Bank Profitability: Macroeconomic Evidence from Nigeria. 1-34. Available at SSRN:https://ssrn.com/abstract=1231064.
  3. Acaravci, S.K. and Calim, A.E., 2013, Turkish Banking Sector’s Profitability Factors. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues 3(1), 27-41.
  4. Athanasoglou, P., Brissimis, S. and Delis, M., 2008,
  5. Bank-Spesific, Industry-spesific and Macroeeconomic Determinants of Bank Profitability, Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money 18 (2), 121-136. Atindéhou, R.B. and Gueyie, J.P., 2001, Canadian Chartered Banks’ Stock Returns and Exchange Rate Risk. Management Decision 39(4), 285-295.
  6. Bai, J. and Perron, P., 1998, Estimating and Testing Linear Models with Multiple Structural Changes, Econometrica 66, 47–78.
  7. Bai, J. and Perron, P., 2003, Computation and Analysis of Multiple Structural Change Models, Journal of Applied Econometrics 18, 1–22.
  8. Bank Association of Turkey, Statistical Reports, 2017,
  9. Selected Ratios, Available at https://www.tbb.org.tr/en/banks-and-banking-sector-information/statistical-reports/20.
  10. Carrion-i Silvestre, J.L., Kim, D. and Perron, P., 2009, GLS based Unit Root Tests with Multiple Structural Breaks Under Both the Null and the Alternative Hypotheses, Econometric Theory 25 (06), 1754-1792. Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey, 2017a, Financial Stability Report 24, 1-118. Available at. http://www.tcmb.gov.tr/wps/wcm/connect/TR/TCMB+TR/Main+Menu/Yayinlar/Raporlar/ Finansal+Istikrar+Raporu/2017/Sayi+24. Chamberlain, S., Howe, J. S. and Popper, H., 1997, The Exchange Rate Exposure of U.S and Japanese Banking Institutions, Journal of Banking & Finance 21(6), 871-892.
  11. Combey, A. and Togbenou, A., 2017, The Bank Sector Performance and Macroeconomics Environment: Empirical Evidence in Togo, International Journal of Economics and Finance 9(2), 180-188.
  12. Dickey, D. and Fuller, W., 1979, Distribution of the Estimators for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root, Journal of the American Statistical Association 74, 427–431.
  13. Ekinci, A., 2016, The Effect of Credit and Market Risk on Bank Performance: Evidence from Turkey, International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues 6(2), 427-434.
  14. Elliott, G., Rothenberg, T. J. and Stock, J. H., 1996, Efficient Tests for an Autoregressive Uni