Dergiler / Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica / 2021 / Cilt: 55 - Sayı: 6

Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for failed treatment of proximal humerus fractures

Sayfa
480–485
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Conclusion: Treatment with the RTSA for the FTPHF seems to be an effective treatment method that can provide satisfactory radiological and functional outcomes with low complication rates.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the functional and radiological outcomes and complications of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) for failed treatment of proximal humerus fractures (FTPHF).
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Methods: In this retrospective study, 20 patients (17 female, 3 male; mean age = 71.35 years; age range = 54-81 years) who underwent RTSA for FTPHF between 2012 and 2018 were included.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Conclusion: Treatment with the RTSA for the FTPHF seems to be an effective treatment method that can provide satisfactory radiological and functional outcomes with low complication rates.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2012 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the functional and radiological outcomes and complications of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) for failed treatment of proximal humerus fractures (FTPHF). Methods: In this retrospective study, 20 patients (17 female, 3 male; mean age = 71.35 years; age range = 54-81 years) who underwent RTSA for FTPHF between 2012 and 2018 were included. The mean follow-up was 37.85 (range: 24-83) months. Outcome measures included shoulder range of motion, Constant score, ASES (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons) score, visual analog scale (VAS). Intra-or post-operative complications were also recorded. Results: The mean anterior flexion and external rotation improved from 37.25°±10.59° and 11.05°±4.79° preoperatively to 105.53° ± 9.33 and 22.37° ± 4.12° postoperatively, respectively (P < 0.01 for both). The mean Constant and ASES scores ameliorated from 21.95 ± 3.57 and 18.15 ± 4.69 preoperatively to 61.7 ± 7.6 and 71.18 ± 4.69 at the final follow-up, respectively (P < 0.01 for both). VAS significantly reduced from 6.83 ± 2.04 preoperatively to 1.79 ± 0.61 at the final follow-up (P < 0.01). None of the patients had major complications or required revision. Conclusion: Treatment with the RTSA for the FTPHF seems to be an effective treatment method that can provide satisfactory radiological and functional outcomes with low complication rates.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Karademir, G., Tunalı, O., Erşen, A., Akpınar, S., Atalar, A. C. (2022). Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for failed treatment of proximal humerus fractures. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, Cilt: 55 - Sayı: 6, 480–485. https://ajindex.com/articles/427978

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Court-Brown CM, Caesar B. Epidemiology of adult fractures: A review. Injury. 2006
  2. 37(8):691-697. 10.1016/j.injury.2006.04.130 2. Court-Brown CM, Garg A, McQueen MM. The epidemiology of proximal hum- eral fractures. Acta Orthop Scand. 2001
  3. 72(4):365-371. 10.1080/ 000164701753542023 3. Van Der Merwe M, Boyle MJ, Frampton CMA, Ball CM. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty compared with hemiarthroplasty in the treatment of acute prox- imal humeral fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017
  4. 26(9):1539-1545. 10.1016/ j.jse.2017.02.005 4. Neer CS2nd. Displaced proximal humeral fractures: Part I Classification and evaluation 1970. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006
  5. blo. 0000198718.91223.ca 5. Boileau P, Watkinson D, Hatzidakis AM, Hovorka I. Neer award 2005: The grammont reverse shoulder prosthesis: Results in cuff tear arthritis, fracture sequelae, and revision arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2006
  6. 15(5):527-540. 10.1016/j.jse.2006.01.003 6. Levy J, Frankle M, Mighell M, Pupello D. The use of the reverse shoulder prosthesis for the treatment of failed hemiarthroplasty for proximal humeral fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007
  7. 89(2):292-300. 10.2106/JBJS.E.01310 7. Plausinis D, Kwon YW, Zuckerman JD. Complications of humeral head repla- cement for proximal humeral fractures. Instr Course Lect. 2005
  8. Boileau P, Chuinard C, Le Huec JC, Walch G, Trojani C. Proximal humerus fracture sequelae: Impact of a new radiographic classification on arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006
  9. blo. 0000195679.87258.6e 9. Maier MW, Zeifang F, Caspers M, et al. Can reverse shoulder arthroplasty in post-traumatic revision surgery restore the ability to perform activities of daily living? Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2006
  10. 101(2):191-196. 10.1016/j.otsr.2014. 12.007 10. Santana F, Alentorn-Geli E, Guirro P, Torrens C. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for fracture sequelae: How the initial fracture treatment influences the out- comes of joint replacement. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2019
  11. 53(4):278-281. 10.1016/j.aott.2019.03.010 11. Merolla G, Tartarone A, Sperling JW, Paladini P, Fabbri E, Porcellini G. Early clinical and radiological outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty with an eccentric all-polyethylene glenosphere to treat failed hemiarthroplasty and the sequelae of proximal humeral fractures. Int Orthop. 2017
  12. 41(1):141-148. 10. 1007/s00264-016-3188-1 12. Holschen M, Siemes MK, Witt KA, Steinbeck J. Five-year outcome after con- version o