Dergiler / Acta Odontologica Turcica / 2014 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 1

CONCLUSION: Compared to control, thermal and mechanical

Sayfa
1–6
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

However, significant difference was found between the thermaland the mechanical aging groups of Cercon Base (p0.05)

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The purpose of this study was to evaluate theeffect of thermal and mechanical aging on the fracturetoughness of yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystal (Y-TZP) core materials.MATERIALS ANDMETHOD: Disc-shaped specimens for eachcore material (diameter: 15 mm, thickness: 1.2 mm), Cercon Base and Lava Plus, were randomly divided into threegroups (control, thermal aging and mechanical aging).
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Thermal aginggroup specimens were subjected to 104thermal cycles inwater between 5-55 °C (dwell time of 30 s).
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:However, significant difference was found between the thermaland the mechanical aging groups of Cercon Base (p0.05)
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate theeffect of thermal and mechanical aging on the fracturetoughness of yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystal (Y-TZP) core materials.MATERIALS ANDMETHOD: Disc-shaped specimens for eachcore material (diameter: 15 mm, thickness: 1.2 mm), Cercon Base and Lava Plus, were randomly divided into threegroups (control, thermal aging and mechanical aging). Noaging was applied to control specimens. Thermal aginggroup specimens were subjected to 104thermal cycles inwater between 5-55 °C (dwell time of 30 s). Mechanicalaging group specimens were subjected to a 200 N load for105times, with a frequency of 2 Hz. The fracture toughnessof the control, thermal and the mechanical aging groupswere measured by using the indentation fracture technique. Ten indentations were performed for each material.After each indentation, microscopic readings wererecorded and the fracture toughness was calculated according to an established formula. Results were statistically analyzed by using a two-way analysis of variance(ANOVA) test.RESULTS: Indentation fracture toughness values of the control, the thermal and the mechanical aging groups of Cercon Base were 6.28, 6.39 and 6.02 MPa?m, respectively.There was no significant difference between the controlgroup of Cercon Base and the aging groups (p>0.05). However, significant difference was found between the thermaland the mechanical aging groups of Cercon Base (p0.05)

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

BAL, B. T., NEMLİ, S. K., SİNDEL, P. T., AYDIN, C. (2022). CONCLUSION: Compared to control, thermal and mechanical. Acta Odontologica Turcica, Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 1, 1–6. https://ajindex.com/articles/427564

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. Yılmaz H, Nemli SK, Aydin C, Bal BT, Tıraş T. Effect of fatigue on biaxial flexural strength of bilayered porcelain/zirconia (Y-TZP) dental ceramics. Dent Mater 2011;27:786-95.
  2. Cattani-Lorente M, Scherrer SS, Ammann P, Jobin M, Wiskott HW. Low temperature degradation of a Y-TZP dental ceramic. Acta Bioma- ter 2011;7:858-65.
  3. Conrad HJ, Seong WJ, Pesun IJ. Current ceramic materials and systems with clinical recommendations: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 2007;98:389-404.
  4. Harada K, Shinya A, Yokoyama D, Shinya A. Effect of loading condi- tions on the fracture toughness of zirconia. J Prosthodont Res 2013;57:82-7.
  5. Yilmaz H, Aydin C, Gul BE. Flexural strength and fracture toughness of dental core ceramics. J Prosthet Dent 2007;98:120-8.
  6. Fischer H, Marx R. Fracture toughness of dental ceramics: compari- son of bending and indentation method. Dent Mater 2002;18:12-9.
  7. Guazzato M, Albakry M, Ringer SP, Swain MV. Strength, fracture to- ughness and microstructure of a selection of all-ceramic materials. Part I. Pressable and alumina glass-infiltrated ceramics. Dent Mater 2004;20:441-8.
  8. Quinn GD, Salem J, Bar-on I, Cho K, Foley M, Fang H. Fracture of ad- vanced ceramics at room temperature. J Res Natl Inst Stand Technol 1992;97:579-607.
  9. Fujii T, Nose T. Evaluation of fracture toughness for ceramic materi- als. IJIS Int 1989;29:717-25.
  10. Nose T, Fujii T. Evaluation of fracture toughness for ceramic mate- rials by a single-edge-precracked-beam method. J Am Ceram Soc 1988;71:328-33. Srawley JE. Wide range stress ıntensity factor expressions for ASTM E 399 standard fracture toughness specimens. Int J Fract 1976;12:475- 6. Chantikul PG, Anstis R, Lawn BR, Marshall DB. A Critical Evaluation of Indentation Techniques for Measuring Fracture Toughness: II, Strength Method. J Am Ceram Soc 1981;64:539-43.
  11. Anstis GR, Chantikul P, Lawn BR, Marshall DB. A critical evaluation of indentation techniques for measuring fracture toughness: I, Direct crack measurements. J Am Ceram Soc 1981;64:533-8.
  12. Nemli SK, Yilmaz H, Aydin C, Bal BT, Tıraş T. Effect of fatigue on fracture toughness and phase transformation of Y-TZP ceramics by X- ray diffraction and Raman spectroscopy. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2012:100B:416-24.
  13. Borchers L, Stiesch M, Bach FW, Buhl JC, Hübsch C, Kellner T, et al. Influence of hydrothermal and mechanical conditions on the strength of zirconia. Acta Biomater 2010;6:4547-52.
  14. Studart AR, Filser F, Kocher P, Gauckler LJ. Fatigue of zirconia under cyclic loading