Dergiler / Acta Odontologica Turcica / 2015 / Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 2

Orginal reseach article Effects of adhesive systems applied under fissure sealants to microleakage and shear bond strength

Sayfa
63–67
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The microleakage data was analyzed by using theKruskal-Wallis and Tamhane tests.RESULTS: The microleakage of the Adper Single Bond Plusgroup was significantly less than that of the control group(p

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The aim of this study was to examine the effectof bonding agents under fissure sealants on bond strengthand microleakage.MATERIALS ANDMETHOD: A total of 210 freshly extracted noncarious human third molar teeth were used (105 teeth forshear bond strength and 105 teeth for microleakage assessment).
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The teeth were randomly assigned to 14groups, with 15 teeth in each group.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The microleakage data was analyzed by using theKruskal-Wallis and Tamhane tests.RESULTS: The microleakage of the Adper Single Bond Plusgroup was significantly less than that of the control group(p
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

The aim of this study was to examine the effectof bonding agents under fissure sealants on bond strengthand microleakage.MATERIALS ANDMETHOD: A total of 210 freshly extracted noncarious human third molar teeth were used (105 teeth forshear bond strength and 105 teeth for microleakage assessment). The teeth were randomly assigned to 14groups, with 15 teeth in each group. Fissurit FX was applied to the etched enamel in the control groups. In the experimental groups, the self-etch adhesives: Clearfil SEBond, G Bond, Clearfil DC Bond and the total-etch adhesives: Prelude, Adper Single Bond and Optibond S wereapplied and light-cured followed by the subsequent application and light-curing of Fissurit FX. Shear bond strengthwas tested to failure in a universal testing machine with a1 mm/min crosshead speed. The shear bond strength datawas analyzed by using One Way ANOVA and Tukey HSDtests. Microleakage was evaluated by using a dye penetration method after mechanical loading and thermocycling. The microleakage data was analyzed by using theKruskal-Wallis and Tamhane tests.RESULTS: The microleakage of the Adper Single Bond Plusgroup was significantly less than that of the control group(p

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

BOTSALI, M. S., KÜÇÜKYILMAZ, E., ŞENER, Y., TOSUN, G., ALTUNSOY, M. (2022). Orginal reseach article Effects of adhesive systems applied under fissure sealants to microleakage and shear bond strength. Acta Odontologica Turcica, Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 2, 63–67. https://ajindex.com/articles/427562

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Feldens EG, Feldens CA, de Araujo FB, Souza MA. Invasive techni- que of pit and fissure sealants in primary molars: a SEM study. J Clin Pe- diatr Dent 1994;18:187-90.
  2. Duangthip D, Lussi A. Effects of fissure cleaning methods, drying agents, and fissure morphology on microleakage and penetration ability of sealants in vitro. Pediatr Dent 2003;25:527-33.
  3. Salama FS, Al-Hammad NS. Marginal seal of sealant and compomer materials with and without enameloplasty. Int J Paediatr Dent 2002;12:39-46.
  4. El-Housseiny AA, Sharaf AA. Evaluation of fissure sealant applied to topical fluoride treated teeth. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2005;29:215-9.
  5. Gordon PH, Nunn JH. Fissure sealants. In: Murray JJ, ed. The Pre- vention of Oral Disease. 3rded. New York: Oxford University Press; 1996. p.78-94.
  6. Barroso JM, Torres CP, Lessa FC, Pecora JD, Palma-Dibb RG, Bor- satto MC. Shear bond strength of pit-and-fissure sealants to saliva-con- taminated and noncontaminated enamel. J Dent Child (Chic) 2005;72:95-9.
  7. Tulunoglu O, Bodur H, Uçtaşli M, Alaçam A. The effect of bonding agents on the microleakage and bond strength of sealant in primary teeth. J Oral Rehabil 1999;26:436-41.
  8. Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Mattar D, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P. Microtensile bond strengths of an etch & rinse and self-etch adhe- sive to enamel and dentin as a function of surface treatment. Oper Dent 2003;28:647-60. Jones EF. A 2-year clinical evaluation of two pit and fissure sealants placed with and without the use of a bonding agent. Quintessence Int 1993;24:131-3.
  9. Cehreli ZC, Gungor HC. Quantitative microleakage evaluation of fis- sure sealants applied with or without a bonding agent: results after four- year water storage in vitro. J Adhes Dent 2008;10:379-84.
  10. Gomes-Silva JM, Torres CP, Contente MM, Oliveira MA, Palma- Dibb RG, Borsatto MC. Bond strength of a pit-and-fissure sealant as- sociated to etch-and-rinse and self-etching adhesive systems to saliva-contaminated enamel: individual vs. simultaneous light curing. Braz Dent J 2008;19:341-7.
  11. Feigal RJ, Quelhas I. Clinical trial of a self-etching adhesive for sea- lant application: success at 24 months with Prompt L-Pop. Am J Dent 2003;16:249-51.
  12. Venker DJ, Kuthy RA, Qian F, Kanellis MJ. Twelve-month sealant re- tention in a school-based program using a self-etching primer/adhesive. J Public Health Dent 2004;64:191-7.
  13. Perdigao J, Carmo AR, Anauate-Netto C, Amore R, Lewgoy HR, Cordeiro HJ, et al. Clinical performance of a self-etching adhesive at 18 months. A