KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Acarological Studies / 2022 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1

A contribution to avian ectoparasite fauna of Turkey: the reports of feather mites and tick on the Great tit (Parus major L.)

Mustafa AÇICI
Gökhan EREN
Sayfa
21–27
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

With this study, A. mucronatus and P. stylifer have been reported for the first time from Turkey, and the feather mite fauna of Turkey has reached 42 identified species.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Birds have a symbiotic relationship with many ectoparasite groups such as chewing lice (Mallophaga: Amblycera, Ischnocera), fleas (Siphonaptera), keds (Diptera: Hippoboscidae), mites (Acari: Sarcoptiformes, Trombidiformes) and ticks (Acari: Ixodidae, Argasidae).
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:In fact, this relationship is mainly based on parasitism, but feather mites are mostly classified as commensal ectosymbionts, compared to other parasitic insects and arachnids.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:With this study, A. mucronatus and P. stylifer have been reported for the first time from Turkey, and the feather mite fauna of Turkey has reached 42 identified species.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Analges mucronatus · Ixodes frontalis · Proctophyllodes stylifer

Abstract

Birds have a symbiotic relationship with many ectoparasite groups such as chewing lice (Mallophaga: Amblycera, Ischnocera), fleas (Siphonaptera), keds (Diptera: Hippoboscidae), mites (Acari: Sarcoptiformes, Trombidiformes) and ticks (Acari: Ixodidae, Argasidae). In fact, this relationship is mainly based on parasitism, but feather mites are mostly classified as commensal ectosymbionts, compared to other parasitic insects and arachnids. This study reports tick and feather mite species detected on a dead specimen of the Great Tit (Parus major L.) that was brought to the Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Samsun, Turkey. As a result of the parasitological examination, the tick samples were identified as Ixodes frontalis (Panzer) and feather mites were identified as Analges mucronatus (Buchholz) and Proctophyllodes stylifer (Buchholz). With this study, A. mucronatus and P. stylifer have been reported for the first time from Turkey, and the feather mite fauna of Turkey has reached 42 identified species.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

AÇICI, M., EREN, G. (2022). A contribution to avian ectoparasite fauna of Turkey: the reports of feather mites and tick on the Great tit (Parus major L.). Acarological Studies, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1, 21–27. https://ajindex.com/articles/427335

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (8)

  1. Aksin, N. 2007. Freyana anatina (Koch, 1844) feather mites (Acarina, Freyanoidea) recorded for the first time on wild ducks (Subfamily, Anatinae) in Turkey. Türkiye Parazitoloji Dergisi, 31 (4): 302-305.
  2. Aksin, N. 2010. Chewing lice and feather mites on wild partridges. The Indian Veterinary Journal, 87: 940-941.
  3. Aksin, N. 2011. Feather mites (Acari: Astigmata) on wild quail (Coturnix coturnix). Indian Veterinary Journal, 88 (4): 69. Atyeo, W.T. and Braasch, N.L. 1966. The feather mite genus Proctophyllodes (Sarcoptiformes: Proctopbyllodidae). Bulletin of the University of Nebraska State Museum, 5: 1-354.
  4. Bakırcı, S. and Güleğen, E. 2005. Bir güvercinde tüy akarı (Falculifer rostratus, Buchholz, 1869) olgusu. 14. Ulusal Parazitoloji Kongresi, 25-27 Eylül 2005,
  5. İzmir, Turkey, 217. [In Turkish] Beaman, M. and Madge, S. 2010. The handbook of bird identification: for Europe and the western Palearctic. A&C Black Publishers, p.715, London, U.K, 868 pp. Behnke, J.M., McGregor, P.K., Shepherd, M., Wiles, R., Barnard, C., Gilbert, F.S. and Hurst, J.L. 1995. Identity, prevalence and intensity of infestation with wing feather mites on birds (Passeriformes) from the Setubal Peninsula of Portugal. Experimental and Applied Acarology, 19 (8): 443-458. doi: 10.1007/BF00048263 Blanco, G., Tella, J.L., Potti, J. and Baz, A. 2001. Feather mites on birds: costs of parasitism or conditional outcomes?. Journal of Avian Biology, 32 (3): 271-274. doi: 10.1111/j.0908-8857.2001.320310.x. Bursali, A., Keskin, A. and Tekin, S. 2012. A review of the ticks (Acari: Ixodida) of Turkey: species diversity, hosts and geographical distribution. Experimental and Applied Acarology, 57 (1): 91-104. doi: 10.1007/s10493-012-9530-4
  6. Brinkerhoff, R.J., Dang, L., Streby, H.M. and Gimpel, M. 2019. Life history characteristics of birds influence patterns of tick parasitism. Infection Ecology and Epidemiology, 9 (1): 1547096. doi: 10.1080/20008686.2018.1547096 Clifford, C.M. and Anastos, G. 1960. The use of chaetotaxy in the identification of larval ticks (Acarina: Ixodidae). The Journal of Parasitology, 46 (5): 567-578.
  7. Dabert. J. and Mironov, S.V. 1999. Origin and evolution of feather mites (Astigmata). Experimental and Applied Acarology, 23: 437-454. doi: 10.1023/A:1006180705101 Dabert, M., Solarczyk, P., Badek, A. and Dabert, J. 2004. Taxonomic status of the oligoxenous feather mite species: are we dealing with species in statu nascendi? Phytophaga, 14: 425-431.
  8. Dabert, J., Mironov, S.V. and Janiga,