Dergiler / A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 2

Urban protection and renewal dilemma: İzmir Mezarlıkbaşı

Sayfa
443–459
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Commu- nity groups are not seen as part of the planning activities and planning has been remote, fragmented and exclusively missing an integrated planning management approach

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:At the beginning of the 21st century, efforts to preserve cultural heritage in his- torical settlements is a highly problematic and multi-faceted issue in Turkey.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Al- though conservation legislation dates back to 60 years ago, heritage conservation has not been internalized and accepted in the wider part of society, and, has not established a sound political foundation.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Commu- nity groups are not seen as part of the planning activities and planning has been remote, fragmented and exclusively missing an integrated planning management approach
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

At the beginning of the 21st century, efforts to preserve cultural heritage in his- torical settlements is a highly problematic and multi-faceted issue in Turkey. Al- though conservation legislation dates back to 60 years ago, heritage conservation has not been internalized and accepted in the wider part of society, and, has not established a sound political foundation. On the other, however, there is also a lack of integrated land-use planning and management. The purpose of this study is to present the difficulties of dealing with the con- servation, renewal, and regeneration for heritage areas in the historic core of İzmir, Mezarlıkbaşı-Kemeraltı, as well as to discuss the intrinsic physical qualities, dynamic characters and diversity of community groups with a view of new spa- tial agenda. The objective of the study is therefore twofold: 1) documentation of the physical characteristics and values for understanding the place; 2) to evaluate incorporating integrated strategic planning and management approach pointing the need for incorporating, leadership, partnership, integration and inclusion as a policy guideline for the safeguarding the heritage area. Our findings show that the Municipality of İzmir has made a significant attempt as TARKEM’s leadership position, which has succeeded in attracting national and international interest in Kemeraltı and creating opportunities for the future, but partnership (opera- tion), management (structure) and inclusion (its processes) still lack. Commu- nity groups are not seen as part of the planning activities and planning has been remote, fragmented and exclusively missing an integrated planning management approach

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

TURAN, M., AKPINAR1, F., TOKÖZ, Ö. D. (2022). Urban protection and renewal dilemma: İzmir Mezarlıkbaşı. A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 2, 443–459. https://ajindex.com/articles/426355

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (6)

  1. Anlı, A. & Osmay, S. (2007). Türki- ye’de Kentsel Dönüşüme Yöntemsel Bir Yaklaşım [A Methodological Approach to Urban Regeneration in Turkey]. ODTÜ Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, METU JFA, 24/2, 57-82. http://jfa.arch. metu.edu.tr/archive/0258-5316/2007/ cilt24/sayi_2/57-82.pdf APİKAM. (2015). İzmir Su Yolları Haritası [Waterlines Map of İzmir]. İzmir: Ahmet Priştina City Archive, sheet 3, part 10-11.
  2. Atay, Ç. (1998). İzmir Planları [İzmir Plans]. Ankara: Ajans Türk Basım ve Basım A.Ş. Aydoğan, M., & Ecemiş Kılıç, S. (2009). Tarihi kent dokularının korun- masında katılımcı bir uygulama projesi örneği: Kemeraltı [Kemeraltı: An im- plementation project considering public participation for historic urban conser- vation]. In P. Aykaç (Ed.), Tarihi Çevre- de Koruma: Yaklaşımlar, Uygulamalar, Dosya 14.2 [Historic Urban Conserva- tion: Approaches, Implementations, File 14.], 14-19. Ankara: TMMOB Mimarlar Odası Ankara Şubesi Yayınları.
  3. Bora, S. (1995). İzmir Yahudileri tar- ihi: 1908-1923 [History of Jews of İzmir: 1908:1923]. İstanbul: Gözlem Gazeteci- lik Basın ve Yayın A.Ş. Bora, S. (2015). Bir semt bir bina: Karataş Hastanesi ve çevresinde Yahu- di izleri [A neighbourhood, a building: Traces of the Jews in Karataş Hospital and its environs]. İzmir:
  4. İzmir Büyükşe- hir Belediyesi Yayını, Ünik Binalar Seri- si, Sayı 5. Cansuyu. (2016, November). Destek alanları. Retrieved from http://can- suyu.org.tr/tr/icerik/900/36/destek-al- anlari. Carmona, M., Carmona, S., & Gal- lent, N. (2003). Delivering New Homes: Processes, Planning and Providers. Lon- don: Routledge. Deniz Feneri. (2016, November). Main page. Retrieved from http://www. denizfeneri.org.tr/. Dokuz Eylül University, City and Re- gional Planning Department. (2003). Kemeraltı koruma amaçlı imar planı yayınlanmamış revizyon raporu [Un- published revision report of Kemeraltı conservation aimed development plan]. İzmir.
  5. Erol, I. (2019). New geographies of residential capitalism: Financialization of the Turkish housing market since the early 2000s. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. Vol. 43/4, 617-814. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468- 2427.12794. Gallent, N., Anderson, J., & Bianconi, M. (2006). Planning on the Edge. Rout- ledge: London and New York. Göç İdaresi Genel Müdürlüğü. (2019, February). Geçici koruma. Re- trieved from http://www.goc.gov.tr/ icerik3/gecici-koruma_363_378_4713. İHH. (2016, November). Main page. Retrieved from https://www.ihh.org.tr/.
  6. İzmir Metropolitan Municipality. (1941).