Dergiler / A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 3

Decision-making method for choosing best alternatives for internal walls based on cost and sound insulation performance

Sayfa
735–751
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

As a result, it was demonstrated that the combined method used in the study is a convenient method for decision making and yields satisfactory results.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The main objective for architects is to improve building quality for occupants.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:For user comfort and physical performance, primarily parameters of building elements such as sound insulation, thermal insulation, resistance to fire and moisture are evaluated.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:As a result, it was demonstrated that the combined method used in the study is a convenient method for decision making and yields satisfactory results.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

The main objective for architects is to improve building quality for occupants. For user comfort and physical performance, primarily parameters of building elements such as sound insulation, thermal insulation, resistance to fire and moisture are evaluated. However, especially on walls, applications made to enhance these parameters such as designing a double wall, can be in contradiction with some other parameters such as cost, weight and thickness which are desired to be minimized. This reveals the problem of decision-making in the selection of building elements for architects. This study aims to find the optimum internal wall that complies with the Acoustic Regulation of Turkey and maximizes the airborne sound insulation performance while minimizing other parameters (cost, weight, thickness). In this research, starting from the simplest single wall type, number 509 of non-load bearing masonry interior wall alternatives made of brick and autoclaved aerated concrete (AAC) blocks were generated. Values of the sound insulation, cost, weight and thickness parameters of the walls were calculated, and then optimal alternatives were selected by one of the most used MCDM (Multi-Criteria Decision Making) method namely as TOPSIS (The Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution) method. Moreover, Copeland technique was used to aggregate the data obtained for different similar weighting values in the application of the TOPSIS Method. As a result, it was demonstrated that the combined method used in the study is a convenient method for decision making and yields satisfactory results.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ÖZBİLEN, B. Ş., BAYAZIT, N. (2022). Decision-making method for choosing best alternatives for internal walls based on cost and sound insulation performance. A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 3, 735–751. https://ajindex.com/articles/426333

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (9)

  1. Al-Sharrah, G. (2010). Ranking using the Copeland score: A comparison with the Hasse diagram. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 50, 785–791.
  2. Anshelevich, E., Bhardwaj, O.& Postl, J. (2015). Approximating optimal social choice under metric preferences, Proceedings of the 29th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Austin, Texas, January 25-30.
  3. Arıbaş, M., & Özcan, U. (2016). Akademik araştırma projelerinin AHP ve TOPSIS yöntemleri kullanılarak değerlendirilmesi. Politeknik Dergisi, 19 (2),163-173.
  4. Arslan, R. (2018). Çok kriterli karar verme yöntemlerinin karşılaştırılması ve bütünleştirilmesi: OECD verileri üzerine bir uygulama (Doktora tezi). Sivas Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi,
  5. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Sivas. Bana e Costa, C.A., De Corte, J.M., & Vansnick, J.C. (2012) MACBETH. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 11(02), 359–87.
  6. Beldek, U. (2009). Design and improvement of multi-level decision- making models (Ph.D. thesis). Middle East Technical University, The Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Ankara.
  7. Belton, V., & Stewart, T. (2002). Multiple criteria decision analysis: An integrated approach. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer Science & Business Media. Benyoucef, L., Hennet, J.C., & Tiwari, M.K. (Eds.). (2014). Applications of multi-criteria and game theory approaches: manufacturing and logistics. London: Springer-Verlag. Borda, J.C. (1784). Memoire sur les elections au scrutin. Paris: Histoire de I’Academie Royaledes Sciences Brans, J. P., Mareschal, B., & Vincke, P. (1984). PROMETHEE: A new family of outranking methods in multicriteria analysis, Operational Research, 3, 477- 490. Brauers, W. K. M. (2004). Optimization methods for a stakeholder society. A revolution in economic thinking by multiobjective optimization. Boston, MA: Kluwer. Brauers, W. K. M., & Zavadskas, E. K. (2006). The MOORA method and its application to privatization in a transition economy. Control and Cybernetics, 35 (2), 445–469.
  8. Brauers, W. K. M., & Zavadskas, E. K. (2010). Project management by MULTIMOORA as an instrument for transition economies. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 16, 5–24.
  9. BSI British Standards Institution. (2015). Specification for masonry units - Part 4: Autoclaved aerated concrete masonry units (BS EN 771-4:2011+A1). CBRT Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey Head Office. (2019). CBRT Exchange Rates [Website]. Retrieved Sep 18, 2019 from: https://www.tcmb. gov.tr/wps/wcm/connect/en/tcmb+en