Dergiler / Zeynep Kamil medical journal (Online) / 2022 / Cilt: 53 - Sayı: 1

Parental chromosomal abnormalities in individuals with recurrent pregnancy loss

Sayfa
40–44
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Parental chromosome analysis is cru- cial in elaborating the cause of RPL, to provide accurate genetic counseling and preimplantation genetic diagnosis when possible.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: Chromosomal abnormality is a frequent cause of recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL), which is described as the loss of two or more pregnancies before 24 weeks of gestation.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Material and Methods: Consecutive 400 patients (200 couples) who were referred to our center with the complaint of RPL were included in the study.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Parental chromosome analysis is cru- cial in elaborating the cause of RPL, to provide accurate genetic counseling and preimplantation genetic diagnosis when possible.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Objective: Chromosomal abnormality is a frequent cause of recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL), which is described as the loss of two or more pregnancies before 24 weeks of gestation. The aim of this study was to investigate the type and frequency of chromo- somal abnormalities in couples with a history of RPL. Material and Methods: Consecutive 400 patients (200 couples) who were referred to our center with the complaint of RPL were included in the study. Routine karyotyp- ing was performed using Giemsa-trypsin-Giemsa (GTG) or Giemsa-trypsin-Leishman (GTL) banding after obtaining a signed informed consent form. The patient data were then retrospectively retrieved. Results: The median age was 32±6.25 years. Chromosomal abnormalities were detected in 4% of the patients (n=16). Of the 16 patients with chromosomal abnor- malities, 9 patients had reciprocal and 1 had Robertsonian translocations. Two had inversions. Two cases had mosaic monosomy X while the remaining two had mosaic trisomy X. No significant association was found between the presence of chromosom- al abnormality and age or gender (p>0.05). Conclusion: The majority of the chromosomal abnormalities causing RPL result from balanced translocations, and other structural or numerical chromosomal abnormali- ties may also be the cause of pregnancy loss. Parental chromosome analysis is cru- cial in elaborating the cause of RPL, to provide accurate genetic counseling and preimplantation genetic diagnosis when possible.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ŞAHİN, O., ERTÜRK, B., KARAÇORLU, Ö. F. (2022). Parental chromosomal abnormalities in individuals with recurrent pregnancy loss. Zeynep Kamil medical journal (Online), Cilt: 53 - Sayı: 1, 40–44. https://ajindex.com/articles/426132

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Hennessy M, Dennehy R, Meaney S, Linehan L, Devane D, Rice R, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for recurrent miscarriage in high-income countries: A systematic review. Reprod Biomed Online 2021;42:1146–71
  2. ESHRE PGT Consortium Steering Committee, Carvalho F, Coonen E, Goossens V, Kokkali G, Rubio C, et al. ESHRE PGT Consortium good practice recommendations for the organisation of PGT. Hum Reprod Open 2020;2020:hoaa021
  3. ESHRE Guideline Group on RPL, Bender Atik R, Christiansen OB, El- son J, Kolte AM, Lewis S, et al. ESHRE guideline: Recurrent pregnancy loss. Hum Reprod Open 2018;2018:hoy004 4. Popescu F, Jaslow CR, Kutteh WH. Recurrent pregnancy loss evalu- ation combined with 24-chromosome microarray of miscarriage tissue provides a probable or definite cause of pregnancy loss in over 90% of patients. Hum Reprod 2018;33:579–87
  4. Franssen MT, Musters AM, van der Veen F, Repping S, Leschot NJ, Bossuyt PM, et al. Reproductive outcome after PGD in couples with recurrent miscarriage carrying a structural chromosome abnormality: A systematic review. Hum Reprod Update 2011;17:467–75
  5. Rai R, Regan L. Recurrent miscarriage. Lancet 2006;368:601–11
  6. Hamerton JL, Canning N, Ray M, Smith S. A cytogenetic survey of 14,069 newborn infants. I. Incidence of chromosome abnormalities. Clin Genet 1975;8:223–43
  7. Nielsen J, Wohlert M. Chromosome abnormalities found among 34,910 newborn children: Results from a 13-year incidence study in Arhus, Den- mark. Hum Genet 1991;87:81–3
  8. Fryns JP, Van Buggenhout G. Structural chromosome rearrangements in couples with recurrent fetal wastage. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1998;81:171–6
  9. Redin C, Brand H, Collins RL, Kammin T, Mitchell E, Hodge JC, et al. The genomic landscape of balanced cytogenetic abnormalities associ- ated with human congenital anomalies. Nat Genet 2017;49:36–45
  10. Stephenson M, Kutteh W. Evaluation and management of recurrent ear- ly pregnancy loss. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2007;50:132–45
  11. Dong Z, Yan J, Xu F, Yuan J, Jiang H, Wang H, et al. Genome sequenc- ing explores complexity of chromosomal abnormalities in recurrent mis- carriage. Am J Hum Genet 2019;105:1102–11
  12. Pal AK, Ambulkar PS, Waghmare JE, Wankhede V, Shende MR, Tarnekar AM. Chromosomal aberrations in couples with pregnancy Loss: A retrospective study. J Hum Reprod Sci 2018;11:247–53
  13. Sahoo T, Dzidic N, Strecker MN, Commander S, Travis MK, Doherty C, et al. Comprehensive genetic analysis of pregnancy loss by chro