Dergiler / Laparoscopic Endoscopic Surgical Science / 2021 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 2

Laparoscopic gastrectomy vs open gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection in gastric cancer: Early postoperative outcomes and feasibility of laparoscopic procedures

Sayfa
83–92
Yayın Tarihi
2022-09-04
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Conclusion: LG procedures are superior to OG with advantageous postoperative clinical outcomes and sim ilar pathologic results in both distal or total gastrectomy patients and can be safely performed for early orlocally advanced gastric carcinomas.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Introduction: Minimal invasive gastrectomy procedures offer better postoperative recovery and lower com plication rates.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Materials and Methods: A total of 50 eligible patients were included in the study.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Conclusion: LG procedures are superior to OG with advantageous postoperative clinical outcomes and sim ilar pathologic results in both distal or total gastrectomy patients and can be safely performed for early orlocally advanced gastric carcinomas.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Introduction: Minimal invasive gastrectomy procedures offer better postoperative recovery and lower com plication rates. Furthermore, oncological outcomes are not inferior to conventional open gastrectomy (OG)procedures. The aim of this study was to evaluate the short-term postoperative clinical outcomes and his topathological results after laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) versus OG in our clinic. Materials and Methods: A total of 50 eligible patients were included in the study. All the patients were dividedinto two main groups as LG (n=18) and OG (n=32). Demographic parameters, intraoperative findings, earlypostoperative outcomes, and histopathological findings were compared between the groups. Results: Age, gender, BMI, comorbid diseases, ASA scores, neoadjuvant treatment history were similar inboth LG and OG groups. The mean first flatus time (LG: 2.01 vs. OG: 2.62 days, p=0.002) and hospital stay(LG: 10.2 vs. OG: 14.4 days, p=0.004) were shorter and estimated blood loss was lesser (LG: 147.5 vs. OG:194.5 ml, p=0.041) in LG patients. The duration of operation significantly higher in LG patients (285.7 vs.239.7 min, p<0.001). Postoperative 30-day minor and major complications and mortality rates were lesserin LG patients but the differences were not significant. The mean number of retrieved total lymph nodes intotal gastrectomy patients (LTG: 39.2 vs. OTG: 38.7, p=0.982) and in distal gastrectomy patients (LDG: 32.4vs. ODG: 37.1, p=0.649) were similar to open procedures. Conclusion: LG procedures are superior to OG with advantageous postoperative clinical outcomes and sim ilar pathologic results in both distal or total gastrectomy patients and can be safely performed for early orlocally advanced gastric carcinomas.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

LALE, A., AYGEN, E. (2022). Laparoscopic gastrectomy vs open gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection in gastric cancer: Early postoperative outcomes and feasibility of laparoscopic procedures. Laparoscopic Endoscopic Surgical Science, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 2, 83–92. https://ajindex.com/articles/423534

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (10)

  1. WHO. Cancer. Available at: https://www.who.int/news-room/ fact-sheets/detail/cancer. Accessed Mar 3, 2021
  2. Kitano S, Iso Y, Moriyama M, Sugimachi K. Laparoscopy-assisted Billroth I gastrectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1994;4:146–8. Erratum in: Surg Laparosc Endosc 2013;23:480
  3. Lu J, Huang CM, Zheng CH, Li P, Xie JW, Wang JB, et al. Short- and long-term outcomes after laparoscopic versus open total gastrectomy for elderly gastric cancer patients: a propensity score-matched analysis. J Gastrointest Surg 2015;19:1949–57
  4. Chen X, Feng X, Wang M, Yao X. Laparoscopic versus open distal gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and high-quality nonrandomized comparative studies. Eur J Surg Oncol 2020;46:1998–2010
  5. Shan F, Gao C, Li XL, Li ZY, Ying XJ, Wang YK, et al. Shortand long-term outcomes after laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for elderly gastric cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2020;30:713–22
  6. Kim W, Kim HH, Han SU, Kim MC, Hyung WJ, Ryu SW, et al; Korean Laparo-endoscopic Gastrointestinal Surgery Study (KLASS) Group. Decreased morbidity of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy compared with open distal gastrectomy for stage i gastric cancer: short-term outcomes from a multicenter randomized controlled trial (KLASS-01). Ann Surg 2016;263:28–35
  7. Katai H, Mizusawa J, Katayama H, Takagi M, Yoshikawa T, Fukagawa T, et al. Short-term surgical outcomes from a phase III study of laparoscopy-assisted versus open distal gastrectomy with nodal dissection for clinical stage IA/ IB gastric cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG0912. Gastric Cancer 2017;20:699–708
  8. Hyung WJ, Yang HK, Han SU, Lee YJ, Park JM, Kim JJ, et al. A feasibility study of laparoscopic total gastrectomy for clinical stage I gastric cancer: a prospective multi-center phase II clinical trial, KLASS 03. Gastric Cancer 2019;22:214–22
  9. Katai H, Mizusawa J, Katayama H, Kunisaki C, Sakuramoto S, Inaki N, et al; Stomach Cancer Study Group of Japan Clinical Oncology Group. Single-arm confirmatory trial of laparoscopy-assisted total or proximal gastrectomy with nodal dissection for clinical stage I gastric cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group study JCOG1401. Gastric Cancer 2019;22:999–1008
  10. Liu F, Huang C, Xu Z, Su X, Zhao G, Ye J, et al; Chinese Laparoscopic Gastrointestinal Surgery Study (CLASS) Group. Morbidity and mortality of laparoscopic vs open total gas