Dergiler / Laparoscopic Endoscopic Surgical Science / 2022 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 1

Peri-and post-operative comparison of 24 hour ph monitoring results in patients who with laparoscopic ant-reflux surgery

Sayfa
14–17
Yayın Tarihi
2022-09-04
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Based on these results, Nissen fundoplication is a successful and effective procedure. 24 h pH monitoring should be done post anti-reflux surgery to assess the effectiveness of the procedure and symptom post-surgery.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:ntroduction: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common medical problem affecting the quality of life and causing morbidity.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The aim of this study is to compare pre- and post-operative 24 h pH monitoring results, life quality, and demographic features of patients with GERD diagnosis who underwent laparoscopic ant-reflux surgery.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Based on these results, Nissen fundoplication is a successful and effective procedure. 24 h pH monitoring should be done post anti-reflux surgery to assess the effectiveness of the procedure and symptom post-surgery.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2016 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

ntroduction: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common medical problem affecting the quality of life and causing morbidity. Twenty four hour pH monitoring is the most sensitive and specific test in diagnos- ing GERD. The aim of this study is to compare pre- and post-operative 24 h pH monitoring results, life quality, and demographic features of patients with GERD diagnosis who underwent laparoscopic ant-reflux surgery. Materials and Methods: In this study, 40 patients who were referred to Afyon Kocatepe university hospital general surgery clinic between January 2016 and August 2017, diagnosed with GERD and underwent laparo- scopic ant-reflux surgery were enrolled. The results of pre- and at least 3 months post-operative 24-h pH monitoring were compared. Results: Of those 40 patients who were enrolled to the study 16(40%) were male and 24 (60%) were female. The overage age of the male patients was 47.65±15.3, and the average age of the females was 42.55±13.5. It was observed that the quality of life scores of the patients, evaluated with GERD-HRQL in the pre-oper- ative period, decreased statistically significantly in the post-operative period. (p=0.001) The pre-operative DeMeester Score of all patients was above the normal value, and when the post-operative analysis results were examined, it was observed that the reflux parameter results decreased. Conclusion: It has been shown that the post-operative 24-h pH monitoring results in patients who underwent laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery decreased significantly compared to the pre-operative results. It was observed that the symptoms were brought under control and the quality of life was improved in the patients. Based on these results, Nissen fundoplication is a successful and effective procedure. 24 h pH monitoring should be done post anti-reflux surgery to assess the effectiveness of the procedure and symptom post-surgery.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Erakın, M., Arıkan, Y., Yılmaz, S., Akıcı, M. (2022). Peri-and post-operative comparison of 24 hour ph monitoring results in patients who with laparoscopic ant-reflux surgery. Laparoscopic Endoscopic Surgical Science, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 1, 14–17. https://ajindex.com/articles/423530

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Feldman M, Friedman LS, Brandt LJ. Sleisenger and Ford- tran’s gastrointestinal and liver disease e-book: pathophys- iology, diagnosis, management, expert consult premium edition-enhanced online features, vol 1. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2010
  2. Koufman JA. The otolaryngologic manifestations of gas- troesophageal reflux disease (GERD): a clinical investigation of 225 patients using ambulatory 24-hour pH monitoring and an experimental investigation of the role of acid and pepsin in the development of laryngeal injury. Laryngoscope 1991;101:1–78
  3. DeMeester TR, Johnson LF. The evaluation of objective mea- surements of gastroesophageal reflux and their contribution to patient management. Surg Clin North Am 1976;56:39–53
  4. Katz PO, Gerson LB, Vela MF. Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Am J Gastroenterol 2013;108:308–28; quiz 329
  5. Vakil N, van Zanten SV, Kahrilas P, Dent J, Jones R; Global Consensus Group. The Montreal definition and classification of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a global evidence-based consensus. Am J Gastroenterol 2006;101:1900–20; quiz 1943
  6. Bor S, Mandiracioglu A, Kitapcioglu G, Caymaz-Bor C, Gilbert RJ. Gastroesophageal reflux disease in a low-income region in Turkey. Am J Gastroenterol 2005;100:759–65
  7. Jung HK, Hong SJ, Jo YJ, Jeon SW, Cho YK, Lee KJ, et al; Korean Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility. Up- dated guidelines 2012 for gastroesophageal reflux disease. [Article in Korean]. Korean J Gastroenterol 2012;60:195–218
  8. Harding SM. Gastroesophageal reflux: a potential asthma trigger. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am 2005;25:131–48
  9. Peters JH, DeMeester TR, Crookes P, Oberg S, de Vos Shoop M, Hagen JA, et al. The treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease with laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication: prospec- tive evaluation of 100 patients with “typical” symptoms. Ann Surg 1998;228:40–50
  10. Olberg P, Johannessen R, Johnsen G, Myrvold HE, Bjerke- set T, Fjösne U, et al. Long-term outcome of surgically and medically treated patients with gastroesophageal reflux dis- ease: a matched-pair follow-up study. Scand J Gastroenterol 2005;40:264–74
  11. Kanwal F, Gralnek IM. Measuring health-related quality of life in gastroenterology and hepatology: part 1. Evid Base Gas- troenterol 2002;3:128–32
  12. Velanovich V. Comparison of generic (SF-36) vs. disease- specific (GERD-HRQL) quality-of-life scales for gastroe- sophageal reflux disease. J Gastrointest Surg 1998;2:14