KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / SOSYAL BİLİMLER METİNLERİ / 2011 / Cilt: 2011 - Sayı: 1

An Analysis on Relationship Between Board Size and Firm Performance for Istanbul Stock Exchange (ISE) National Manufacturing Index Firms

S. Ahmet MENTEŞ
Sayfa
1–21
Yayın Tarihi
2011-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The study concludes by discussing the possible reasons for the findings and proposes recommendations for future studies on the topic.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The paper investigates the relationship between board size and firm performance in Istanbul Stock Exchange (ISE) National Manufacturing Index firms for the period of 2004-2009.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The Board of Directors is a vital internal mechanism of corporate governance and plays a crucial role in the management of the firm.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The study concludes by discussing the possible reasons for the findings and proposes recommendations for future studies on the topic.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2004-2009 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Corporate Governance · Board Size · Performance

Özet

The paper investigates the relationship between board size and firm performance in Istanbul Stock Exchange (ISE) National Manufacturing Index firms for the period of 2004-2009. The Board of Directors is a vital internal mechanism of corporate governance and plays a crucial role in the management of the firm. Specific board features, like board size, and its‟ impact on firm performance have been extensively studied. This study employs two performance measures; one of them is Return on Assets (ROA), which is an earnings based performance measure. The second performance measure is Economic Value Added (EVA), which is a value based performance measure. The study exhibits that the relationship between board size and EVA is insignificant but there is a positive significant relationship between board size and Return on Assets (ROA). The study concludes by discussing the possible reasons for the findings and proposes recommendations for future studies on the topic.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

MENTEŞ, S. A. (2011). An Analysis on Relationship Between Board Size and Firm Performance for Istanbul Stock Exchange (ISE) National Manufacturing Index Firms. SOSYAL BİLİMLER METİNLERİ, Cilt: 2011 - Sayı: 1, 1–21. https://ajindex.com/articles/421725

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (16)

  1. Adams, R.B. and H., Mehran, (2005).
  2. Corporate Performance, Board Structure and its Determinants in the Banking Industry. Working Paper, EFA Moscow Meetings. Anderson, R.C., Mansi, S. & Reeb, D.M., (2004).
  3. Board Characteristics, Accounting Report Integrity, and the Cost of Debt. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 37(3), 315-342
  4. Axon, D. A. J. (2010). Best Practices in Planning and Performance Management Radically Rethinking Management for a Volatile World. (New Jersey): John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Barnhart, S.W. & Roseinstein, S. (1998).
  5. Board Composition, Managerial Ownership, and Firm Performance: An Empirical Analysis. The Financial Review, 33, 1-16.
  6. Becht, M., Bolton, P. & Röel, A. (2002). Corporate Governance and Control. European Corporate Governance Institute, Working Paper No: 02/2002, 10–14.
  7. Behn, R. D. (2003). Why Measure Performance? Different Purposes Require Different Measures. Public Administration Review, 63, 5, 586-605.
  8. Belkhir, M., (2009). Board of Director's Size and Performance in Banking. International Journal of Managerial Finance, 5, 201-221.
  9. Bhagat, S. & Black, B.S., (2002). The Non-Correlation Between Board Independence and Long Term Firm Performance. Journal of Corporation Law, 27, 231-274.
  10. Bloxham, E., (2002). Economic Value Management: Applications and Techniques, (New Jersey): John Wiley&Sons, Inc. Bonn, I., Yoshikawa, T. & Phan, P.H., (2004). Effects of Board Structure on Firm Performance: A Comparison between Japan and Australia. Asian Business & Management, 3, 105-125.
  11. Cheng, S., Evans, J.H., & Nagarajan, N. J., (2008). Board Size and Firm Performance: The Moderating Effects of the Market for Corporate Control. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 31, 121-145.
  12. Conyon, M.J., & Peck, S.I., (1998). Board Size and Corporate Performance: Evidence from European Countries. European Journal of Finance, 4, 291-304.
  13. Daft, R.L., (1997). Management, (Florida): The Dryden Press.
  14. Dechow, P.M., Sloan, R.G. & Sweeney A. P. (1996). Causes and consequences of earnings manipulation: an analysis of firms subject to enforcement actions by the SEC. Contemporary Accounting Research,13, 1–36.
  15. Ehrbar, A. (1998). EVA: The Real Key to Creating Waelth. (New York): John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Eisenberg, T., S., Sundgren, S. & Wells, M.T. (1998). Larger Board Size and Decreasing Firm Value in Small Firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 48, 35-54.
  16. Fama, E.F., & Jensen, M.C. (1983). Separation of Ownership and Control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26,