KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Journal of Management Marketing and Logistics / 2018 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1

THE IMPACT OF SUPPLY CHAIN INTEGRATION ON FIRMS’ BUSINESS AND OPERATIONAL PERFORMANCE AT THE FOOD RETAIL SECTOR/INDUSTRY

Martin Boakye OSEİ
Celal Hakan KAGNİCİOGLU
Sayfa
18–30
Yayın Tarihi
2018-03-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Conclusion- Consequently, retailers in Turkey were admonished to practice and uphold supply chain collaboration with their suppliers and customers.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Purpose-This study researched into the impact of supply chain integration and firm performance of food retailers in Turkey.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The main purpose of this study was to identify the impact of internal and external supply chain integration on firms’ business and operational performance in the food retail sector in Turkey.Methodology-Two big cities in Turkey, namely, Istanbul and Eskişehir were selected for this study due to the availability of major food retailers in these cities.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Conclusion- Consequently, retailers in Turkey were admonished to practice and uphold supply chain collaboration with their suppliers and customers.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Supply chain management · supply chain integration · food retailers

Abstract

Purpose-This study researched into the impact of supply chain integration and firm performance of food retailers in Turkey. The main purpose of this study was to identify the impact of internal and external supply chain integration on firms’ business and operational performance in the food retail sector in Turkey.Methodology-Two big cities in Turkey, namely, Istanbul and Eskişehir were selected for this study due to the availability of major food retailers in these cities. Stratified sampling method was used to select respondents. In total, 216 firms were selected out of which only 208 firms responded to the questionnaire distributed. Structural Equation Model specifically Amos was used to analyse the data. Findings-The study found a positive and significant relationship between internal and external integration, and the study also found a significant and a positive relationship between internal integration and firms’ operational and business performance. On the other hand, the study also found a significant and a positive relationship between external integration and firms’ operational and business performance. Conclusion- Consequently, retailers in Turkey were admonished to practice and uphold supply chain collaboration with their suppliers and customers.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

OSEİ, M. B., KAGNİCİOGLU, C. H. (2018). THE IMPACT OF SUPPLY CHAIN INTEGRATION ON FIRMS’ BUSINESS AND OPERATIONAL PERFORMANCE AT THE FOOD RETAIL SECTOR/INDUSTRY. Journal of Management Marketing and Logistics, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1, 18–30. https://ajindex.com/articles/421144

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. Afshan, N. (2013). The performance outcomes of dimensions of supply chain integration: a conceptual framework. Business: Theory and Practice/Verslas: Teorija ir Praktika, 14 (4), pp.323-331.
  2. Arbuckle, J. L. (2005). AMOS 6.0 User’s Guide. Spring House, PA: Amos Development Corporation. Chopra S. and Meindl, P. (2001).
  3. Strategy, Planning and Operation. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall Inc. Cronbach, L.J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 16, pp.297–334.
  4. Droge, C., Jayaram, J. and Vickery, S. K. (2004). The effects of internal versus external integration practices on time-based performance and overall firm performance. Journal of Operations Management 22(6), pp.557-573.
  5. Dyer, J. H., Cho, D. S. and Chu, W. (1998). Strategic Supplier Segmentation: The Next Best Practice in Supply Chain Management,” California Management Review 40(2), pp.57-77.
  6. El-Ansary, A.I. (1992). A strategic Perspective of Communication and Information Systems in Marketing Channels. Journal of Marketing Channels, 1(4), pp.3-16
  7. Fabbe-Costes, N. and Jahre, M. (2008). Supply Chain Integration and Performance: A Review of The Evidence. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 19(2), pp.130-154.
  8. Flynn, B. B., Huo, B. and Zhao, X. (2010). The Impact of Supply Chain Integration on Performance: A Contingency and Configuration Approach,” Journal of Operations Management, 28 (1), pp.58-71.
  9. Frohlich, M. T. and Westbrook, R. 2001, “Arcs of integration: an international study of supply chain strategies,” Journal of Operations Management, 19(2), pp.185-200.
  10. Germain, R. and Iyer, K. N. (2006). The interaction of internal and downstream integration and its association with performance. Journal of Business Logistics, 27(2), pp.29-52.
  11. Gimenez, C. and Ventura, E., 2005,” Logistics-production, logistics marketing and external integration: their impact on performance,” International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 25 (1), pp.20–38.
  12. Gimenez, C., & Ventura, E. (2003). Supply Chain Management as a Competitive Advantage in The Spanish Grocery Sector. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 14(1), pp. 77-88.
  13. Groves, G. and Valsamakis, V. (1998). Supplier-Customer Relationships and Company Performance,” The International Journal of Logistics Management, 9(2), pp. 51-64.
  14. Hu, L. T. and Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria Versus New Alternatives. Structural Equati