KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Sigma Mühendislik ve Fen Bilimleri Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 1

ASSESMENT OF CHEMICAL TRETABILITY OF FUR-SUEDE PROCESSING WASTEWATER TOGETHER WITH TOXICITY REMOVAL

Günay Yıldız TÖRE
Gül KAYKIOĞLU
Sayfa
261–270
Yayın Tarihi
2018-03-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

These results show that as a first treatment step for fur-suede processing wastewater, chemical coagulation-flocculation with Al2SO4 provide the best performance both to remove COD and Color and also to decrease in toxic effect.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The aim of this study was to assess the conventional coagulation/flocculation treatability efficiency and the toxicity effect of chemically treated effluent on Daphnia magna for fur-suede processing wastewater.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Three different conventional coagulants (FeCl3, Al2SO4, FeSO4) were used in this study and the best treatability conditions (coagulant type and dosage) were determined based on COD and Color removal efficiencies.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:These results show that as a first treatment step for fur-suede processing wastewater, chemical coagulation-flocculation with Al2SO4 provide the best performance both to remove COD and Color and also to decrease in toxic effect.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Fur-suede wastewater · Daphnia magna toxicity · coagulant

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the conventional coagulation/flocculation treatability efficiency and the toxicity effect of chemically treated effluent on Daphnia magna for fur-suede processing wastewater. Three different conventional coagulants (FeCl3, Al2SO4, FeSO4) were used in this study and the best treatability conditions (coagulant type and dosage) were determined based on COD and Color removal efficiencies. After then, toxicity determination of raw and chemically best treated fur-suede processing wastewater were done using with Daphnia magna standard method. The results indicated that while the highest COD removal efficiency was determined for Al2SO4 as 86 % at 800 mgL-1 and pH=8.5, the lowest efficiency was found as 67 % for the same dosage of FeCl3 . On the other hand, Color removal efficiencies were found as 95-98 % for all coagulants and the best results was observed at Al2SO4 at 800 mgL-1 and pH=8.5. By the way, the best toxicity removal was calculated as 60% for effluents (50% diluted) treated with Al2SO4. These results show that as a first treatment step for fur-suede processing wastewater, chemical coagulation-flocculation with Al2SO4 provide the best performance both to remove COD and Color and also to decrease in toxic effect.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

TÖRE, G. Y., KAYKIOĞLU, G. (2018). ASSESMENT OF CHEMICAL TRETABILITY OF FUR-SUEDE PROCESSING WASTEWATER TOGETHER WITH TOXICITY REMOVAL. Sigma Mühendislik ve Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 1, 261–270. https://ajindex.com/articles/419470

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Yıldız Töre G., Insel G., Ubay Çokgör E., Ferlier E., Kabdaşlı I., Orhon D. (2011) Pollution profile and biodegradation characteristics of fur-suede processing effluents, Environmental Technology, 32(10), 1151-1162
  2. Suresh V., Kanthimathi M., Thanikaivelan P., Raghava Rao J., Unni Nair B. (2001) An improved product-process for cleaner chrome tanning in leather processing, Journal of Cleaner Production, 9, 483–491
  3. Nazer D. W., Al-Sa’ed R. M., and Siebel M. A. (2006) Reducing the environmental impact of the unhairing–liming process in the leather tanning industry, Journal of Cleaner Production, 14, 65–74
  4. Oral R., Meriç S., De Nicola E., Petruzzelli D., Della Rocca C., Pagano G. (2007) Multi-species toxicity evaluation of a chromium-based leather tannery wastewater, Desalination 211: 48–57
  5. De Nicola E., Meriç S., Della Rocca C., Gallo M., Iaccarino M., Manini P., et al. (2007) Wastewater toxicity of tannin- vs. chromium-based leather tanneries in Marrakesh Morocco, Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 53(3), 321–328
  6. Jochimsen J.C., Jekel M.R. (1997) Partial oxidation effects during the combined oxidative and biological treatment of separated streams of tannery wastewater, Water Science Technology 35, 337–345
  7. Lofrano G., Meriç S., Zengin G.E. Orhon D. (2013) Chemical and biological treatment technologies for leather tannery chemicals and wastewaters: A review, Science of the Total Environment 461-462, 265-281
  8. Boller M. (1993) Removal of organic matter by physicochemical mechanism in wastewater treatment plants, Water Science Technology 27, 167–183
  9. Ates E., Orhon D., Tunay O. (1997) Characterization of tannery wastewaters for pretreatment selected case studies, Water Science Technology 36, 217–23
  10. Kabdasli I., Tunay O., Orhon D. (1999) Wastewater control and management in a leather tanning district, Water Science Technology 40, 261–7
  11. Song Z., Williams C.J. and Edyvean R.G.J. (2004) Treatment of tannery wastewater by chemical coagulation, Desalination 164: 249–59 [12] Hernando M.D., Fernandez-Alba A.R., Tauler R., Barcelo D. (2005) Toxicity assays applied to wastewater treatment, Talanta 65, 358- 366
  12. Villegas-Navarro A., Romero Gonzalez M.C. and Rosas Lopez E. (1999) Evaluation of Daphnia magna as an indicator of toxicity and treatment efficacy of textile wastewater, Environmental International 25, 619- 624
  13. US Environmental Protection Agency (1979), Development document for effl