KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Sigma Mühendislik ve Fen Bilimleri Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 2

AN ANALYSIS OF THE LINKS BETWEEN PROJECT SUCCESS FACTORS AND PROJECT PERFORMANCE

Dilek ÖZDEMİR GÜNGÖR
Sıtkı GÖZLÜ
Sayfa
223–239
Yayın Tarihi
2016-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Organizational success is affected by both project performance and strategic support directly, whereas the effect of operational support is indirect.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Organizations not only need to adapt themselves to fast evolving environment, but also endeavor to shape it for their survival.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Thus, in this paper, the links between project success factors and project performance and strength of the relationships between the support factors and the success factors are studied and demonstrated to shed some light on project environment.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Organizational success is affected by both project performance and strategic support directly, whereas the effect of operational support is indirect.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:2012 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Project performance · project success factors · SEM.

Abstract

Organizations not only need to adapt themselves to fast evolving environment, but also endeavor to shape it for their survival. Executing projects is one of the important practices for handling difficulties created by changes taking place. Thus, almost all organizations, at any scale, implement a number of projects simultaneously all the time. Yet, executing projects does not ensure success. Thus, in this paper, the links between project success factors and project performance and strength of the relationships between the support factors and the success factors are studied and demonstrated to shed some light on project environment. In order to analyze all factors simultaneously, a project environment model is proposed. To test the research model, a questionnaire survey is conducted in 2012 summer and structural equation modeling (SEM) is used at analyzing stage. Analyzes showed that there four main factors which are forming project environment; these are Strategic Support (1), Operational Support (2), Project Performance (3), and Organizational Success (4). As a result of the analysis, strategic support enables more effective operational support. With effective operational support, project performance increases. Organizational success is affected by both project performance and strategic support directly, whereas the effect of operational support is indirect.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

GÜNGÖR, D. Ö., GÖZLÜ, S. (2016). AN ANALYSIS OF THE LINKS BETWEEN PROJECT SUCCESS FACTORS AND PROJECT PERFORMANCE. Sigma Mühendislik ve Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 2, 223–239. https://ajindex.com/articles/419278

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (18)

  1. Patanakul P. and Milosevic D.(2008) A competency model for effectiveness in managing multiple projects, J. High Technol. Manag. Res., 18,118–131
  2. Patanakul P. and Milosevic D.(2009) The effectiveness in managing a group of multiple projects: Factors of influence and measurement criteria,Int. J. Proj. Manag., 27, 216–233
  3. Bolles D (2002) Building Project-Management Centers of Excellence. Newyork, USA
  4. Kendall G. I. and Rollins S. C. (2003) Advanced Project Portfolio Management and the PMO. Ross Publishing, Inc., USA
  5. Liu L. and Yetton P. (2007) The Contingent Effects on Project Performance of Conducting Project Reviews and Deploying Project Management Offices, IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag., 54, 789–799
  6. Winter S. G. and Wiley J. (2003) Understanding Dynamic Capabilities, Strateg. Manag., 24, 991–995
  7. Jugdev K. (2004) Through the Looking Glass: Examining Theory Development in Project Management with the Resource-Based View Lens, Proj. Manag. J., 35,15–26
  8. Kerzner H., (2009) Project Management: A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling, and Controlling John Wiley and Sons, USA
  9. Hyvari I. (2006) Success of Projects in Different Organizational Conditions,”Proj. Manag. J., 37, 31–42
  10. Hyvari I. (2006) Project management effectiveness in project-oriented business organizations, Int. J. Proj. Manag., 24, 216–225
  11. Voss M. (2012) Impact of customer integration on project portfolio management and its success—Developing a conceptual framework, Int. J. Proj. Manag.,30, 567–581
  12. Petit Y. (2011) Project portfolios in dynamic environments: Organizing for uncertainty, Int. J. Proj. Manag., 30, 539–553
  13. Cooke-Davies T. (2002) The ‘“ real ”’ success factors on projects, Int. J. Proj. Manag., 20, 185–190
  14. Engwall M. and Jerbrant A. (2003) The resource allocation syndrome: the prime challenge of multi-project management?, Int. J. Proj. Manag., 21, 403–409,
  15. Teller J., Unger B. N., Kock A., andGemünden H. G. (2012) Formalization of project portfolio management: The moderating role of project portfolio complexity, Int. J. Proj. Manag., 30, 596–607
  16. Chao R. O., Kavadias S., and Gaimon C. (2009) Revenue Driven Resource Allocation: Funding Authority, Incentives, and New Product Development Portfolio Management, Manage. Sci., 55, 1556–1569
  17. Kumar V., Persaud A., and Kumar T. (1996) To Terminate or Not an Ongoing R & D Project: A Managerial Dilemma, IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag., 43, 273–284
  18. Blichfeldt B. S. and E