Dergiler / Sigma Mühendislik ve Fen Bilimleri Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 4

EFFECTS OF VARYING INLET IRON AND MANGANESE CONCENTRATIONS ON SLOW SAND FILTER PERFORMANCE

Sayfa
505–515
Yayın Tarihi
2016-12-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Sequence analyses of DGGE bands from Run1 and Run2 were also performed and results indicated that a range of bacteria were present, with 16S rRNA gene sequences similar to groups such as Gallionella, Leptothrix, Crenothrix, and an uncharacterized environmental clone.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:In this study a laboratory-scale slow sand filter (SSF) is used for removal of iron and manganese and the effects of various inlet concentrations on removal efficiency were investigated.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:SSF was operated at a filtration rate of 0.2 m.h-1 with two different synthetic inlet waters (Run1 and Run2).
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Sequence analyses of DGGE bands from Run1 and Run2 were also performed and results indicated that a range of bacteria were present, with 16S rRNA gene sequences similar to groups such as Gallionella, Leptothrix, Crenothrix, and an uncharacterized environmental clone.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Slow sand filter · iron-manganese removal · microbial community

Abstract

In this study a laboratory-scale slow sand filter (SSF) is used for removal of iron and manganese and the effects of various inlet concentrations on removal efficiency were investigated. SSF was operated at a filtration rate of 0.2 m.h-1 with two different synthetic inlet waters (Run1 and Run2). Iron and manganese concentrations in two runs were 1.09±0.13mg.L-1–1.06±0.10 mg.L-1 for Run1 and 2.02±0.15 mg.L-1–2.10±0.14 mg.L-1 for Run2. In Run1, the removal efficiencies of 96.3±2.48%, 92.3±6.1%, 92.6±5.7%, and 55.3±8.3% were obtained for turbidity, iron, manganese and total organic carbon (TOC), respectively. In Run2, on the other hand, the removal efficiencies were obtained as 97.9±1.3%, 93.1±8.1%, 94.4±5.8%, and 55.5±6.8%, respectively. Results suggested that the SSF was the most efficient in turbidity removal at a filtration rate of 0.2 m.h-1. Sequence analyses of DGGE bands from Run1 and Run2 were also performed and results indicated that a range of bacteria were present, with 16S rRNA gene sequences similar to groups such as Gallionella, Leptothrix, Crenothrix, and an uncharacterized environmental clone.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

DEMİR, N. M., ATCI, E. B., DEMİR, S. (2016). EFFECTS OF VARYING INLET IRON AND MANGANESE CONCENTRATIONS ON SLOW SAND FILTER PERFORMANCE. Sigma Mühendislik ve Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 4, 505–515. https://ajindex.com/articles/419264

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (11)

  1. Ma J., Guo H., Lei M., Wan X., Zhang H., Feng X., Wei R., Tian L., Han X., (2016) Blocking effect of colloids on arsenate adsorption during co-transport through saturated sand columns, Environmental Pollution 213, 638-647
  2. Hedegaard M.J., Arvin E., Corfitzen C.B., Albrechtsen H.J., (2014) Mecoprop (MCPP) removal in full-scale rapid sand filters at a groundwater-based waterworks, Science of the Total Environment 499, 257–264
  3. Albers C.N., Feld L., Ellegaard-Jensen L., Aamand J., (2015) Degradation of trace concentrations of the persistent groundwater pollutant 2,6-dichlorobenzamide (BAM) in bioaugmented rapid sand filters, Water Research 83, 61-70
  4. EPA Storm Water Technology Fact Sheet Sand Filters, EPA 832-F-99-007, 1999
  5. Grace M.A., Healy M.G., Clifford E., (2016) Performance and surface clogging in intermittently loaded and slow sand filters containing novel media, Journal of Environmental Management 180, 102-110
  6. D'Alessio M., Yoneyama B., Kirs M., Kisand V., Ray C., (2015) Pharmaceutically active compounds: Their removal during slow sand filtration and their impact on slow sand filtration bacterial removal, Science of the Total Environment 524–525, 124–135
  7. Nitzsche K.S., Weigold P., Lösekann-Behrens T., Kappler A., Behrens S., (2015) Microbial community composition of a household sand filter used for arsenic, iron, and manganese removal from groundwater in Vietnam, Chemosphere 138, 47–59
  8. Bruins J.H., Petrusevski B., Slokar Y.M., Huysman K., Joris K., Kruithof J.C., Kennedy M.D., (2015) Biological and physico-chemical formation of Birnessite during the ripening of manganese removal filters, Water Research 69, 154-161
  9. Nitzsche K.S., Lan V.M., Trang P.T.K., Viet P.H., Berg M., Voegelin A., Planer-Friedrich B., Zahoransky J., Müller S.K., Byrne J.M., Schröder C., Behrens S., Kappler A., (2015) Arsenic removal from drinking water by a household sand filter in Vietnam — Effect of filter usage practices on arsenic removal efficiency and microbiological water quality, Science of the Total Environment 502, 526–536
  10. Patil D.S., Chavan S.M., Oubagaranadin J.U.K., (2016) A review of technologies for manganese removal from wastewaters, Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 4, 468–487
  11. Manav Demir N., (2016) Experimental Study of Factors that Affect Iron and Manganese Removal in Slow Sand Filters and Identification of Responsible Microbial Species, Polish Journal of Environmental Studies 25 (4), 1453-1465. [12