KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Sigma Mühendislik ve Fen Bilimleri Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 39 - Sayı: 1

Decoupling analysis of environmental pressures from economic growth in the eu-27 and Turkey

Seher BODUR
Mihraç KÜPELİ
İhsan ALP
Sayfa
29–38
Yayın Tarihi
2021-03-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The input- oriented Malmquist productivity index results show that: there is productivity gain in the entire EU-27 and Turkey.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Global climate change has caused great concern due to its negative impact on social and economic development.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The purpose of this article is to analyze the relationship between the environmental pressures and economic growth in the EU-27 countries and Turkey from 1990 to 2017 (annual data).
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The input- oriented Malmquist productivity index results show that: there is productivity gain in the entire EU-27 and Turkey.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2017 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Decoupling analysis · Greenhouse gas · Malmquist index

Abstract

Global climate change has caused great concern due to its negative impact on social and economic development. Tapio decoupling analysis is a method used to analyze the relationship between economic growth and the environment. The purpose of this article is to analyze the relationship between the environmental pressures and economic growth in the EU-27 countries and Turkey from 1990 to 2017 (annual data). Firstly, this article presents the decoupling states (absolute decoupling, relative decoupling and no decoupling) between gross domestic product (GDP) and environmental pressures (Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, material flows (MF) , land use (LU)) from 1990 to 2017. The following conclusions are generated: (1) In the case of GHG emissions from GDP, there is absolute decoupling in 10 countries and relative decoupling in 9 countries. In 9 countries, no decoupling occurs. (2) In terms of MF from GDP, in 5 countries absolute decoupling occurs and relative decoupling occurs in 13 countries. In 10 countries, no decoupling occurs. (3) In the case of LU from GDP, absolute decoupling occurs in 17 countries and relative decoupling occurs in 1 country. In 10 countries, no decoupling occurs. Secondly, to determine the source of productivity index, Malmquist productivity index is applied to the same countries based on the same period. GDP is used as output variable, while GHG emissions, MF and LU are used as input variable. The input- oriented Malmquist productivity index results show that: there is productivity gain in the entire EU-27 and Turkey.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

BODUR, S., KÜPELİ, M., ALP, İ. (2021). Decoupling analysis of environmental pressures from economic growth in the eu-27 and Turkey. Sigma Mühendislik ve Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 39 - Sayı: 1, 29–38. https://ajindex.com/articles/419208

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. BP (2018). BP statistical review of world energy. Retrieved from https://www.bp.com/.Chen, J., Wang, P., Cui, L., Huang, S., & Song, M. (2018). Decomposition and decoupling analysis of CO2 emissions in OECD. Applied Energy, 231, 937–950
  2. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2002). Indicators to measure decoupling of environmental pressure from economic growth
  3. Tapio, P. (2005). Towards a theory of decoupling: degrees of decoupling in the EU and the case of road traffic in Finland between 1970 and 2001. Transport Policy, 12(2), 137-151
  4. Von Weizsäcker, E. U. (1990). Erdpolitik: Ökologische Realpolitik an der Schwelle zum Jahrhundert der Umwelt (Earth politics: Ecological decision-making on the threshold of the century of the environment). Darmstadt (Germany): Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft
  5. Zhang, Z. (2000). Decoupling China’s carbon emissions increase from economic growth: An economic analysis and policy implications. World Development, 28(4), 739-752
  6. Juknys, R., Miškinis, V., & Dagiliūtė, R. (2005). New Eastern EU Member States: Decoupling of Environmental Impact from Fast Economy Growth. Environmental Research, Engineering & Management, 34(4)
  7. De Freitas, L. C., & Kaneko, S. (2011). Decomposing the decoupling of CO2 emissions and economic growth in Brazil. Ecological Economics, 70(8), 1459-1469
  8. Wan, L., Wang, Z. L., & Ng, J. (2016). Measurement research on the decoupling effect of industries’ carbon emissions—Based on the equipment manufacturing industry in China. Energies, 9(11), 921
  9. Bampatsou, C., Halkos, G., & Dimou, A. (2017). Determining economic productivity under environmental and resource pressures: an empirical application. Journal of Economic Structures, 6(1), 12
  10. Roinioti, A., & Koroneos, C. (2017). The decomposition of CO2 emissions from energy use in Greece before and during the economic crisis and their decoupling from economic growth. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 76, 448-459
  11. Wu, D., Yuan, C., & Liu, H. (2018). The decoupling states of CO2 emissions in the Chinese transport sector from 1994 to 2012: A perspective on fuel types. Energy & Environment, 29(4), 591-612
  12. Engo, J. (2019). Decoupling analysis of CO2 emissions from transport sector in Cameroon. Sustainable Cities and Society, 51, 101732
  13. Shuai, C., Chen, X., Wu, Y., Zhang, Y., & Tan, Y. (2019). A three-step strategy for decoupling economic growth from carbon emission: empirical evi