KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Sigma Mühendislik ve Fen Bilimleri Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 3

AN INTEGER PROGRAMMING MODEL FOR DISASSEMBLY SYSTEM CONFIGURATION

Ömer Faruk YILMAZ
Sayfa
813–825
Yayın Tarihi
2020-09-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

According to the computational results, SSGWA heuristic superior to CSGWA heuristic consistently because it takes both line segmentation and worker assignment decisions into account simultaneously.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:As the product life cycles have continuously decreased, disassembly system design has been regarded to be important for manufacturing enterprises.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Effective design of a disassembly system enables the enterprises to recycle the end of life products with low cost and high utilization of labors.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:According to the computational results, SSGWA heuristic superior to CSGWA heuristic consistently because it takes both line segmentation and worker assignment decisions into account simultaneously.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Disassembly system configuration · line segmentation · worker assignment

Abstract

As the product life cycles have continuously decreased, disassembly system design has been regarded to be important for manufacturing enterprises. Effective design of a disassembly system enables the enterprises to recycle the end of life products with low cost and high utilization of labors. This study focuses on the line segmentation problem of disassembly system where the worker assignment and segment determination decisions are made simultaneously. To do so, higher utilization of worker resources is achieved and disassembly operations are carried out by effective worker teams since the worker timetabling and disassembly line segmentation problems taken into consideration concurrently. To represent the problem mathematically, an integer programming model is developed. Besides, two different heuristic procedures, namely SSGWA and CSGWA, are presented to solve the problem in a reasonable amount of time. According to the computational results, SSGWA heuristic superior to CSGWA heuristic consistently because it takes both line segmentation and worker assignment decisions into account simultaneously.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

YILMAZ, Ö. F. (2020). AN INTEGER PROGRAMMING MODEL FOR DISASSEMBLY SYSTEM CONFIGURATION. Sigma Mühendislik ve Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 3, 813–825. https://ajindex.com/articles/419151

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Bentaha, M. L., Battaïa, O., Dolgui, A., & Hu, S. J. (2014). Dealing with uncertainty in disassembly line design. CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology, 63(1), 21-24
  2. Bentaha, M. L., Dolgui, A., Battaïa, O., Riggs, R. J., & Hu, J. (2018). Profit-oriented partial disassembly line design: dealing with hazardous parts and task processing times uncertainty. International Journal of Production Research, 1-23
  3. Desai, A., & Mital, A. (2003). Evaluation of disassemblability to enable design for disassembly in mass production. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 32(4), 265-281
  4. Edis, E. B., Oguz, C., & Ozkarahan, I. (2013). Parallel machine scheduling with additional resources: Notation, classification, models and solution methods. European Journal of Operational Research, 230(3), 449-463
  5. Igarashi, K., Yamada, T., Gupta, S. M., Inoue, M., & Itsubo, N. (2016). Disassembly system modeling and design with parts selection for cost, recycling and CO2 saving rates using multi criteria optimization. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 38, 151-164
  6. Igarashi, K., Yamada, T., & Inoue, M. (2014). 2-stage optimal design and analysis for disassembly system with environmental and economic parts selection using the recyclability evaluation method. Industrial Engineering and Management Systems, 13(1), 52-66
  7. Lee, D. H., Kang, J. G., & Xirouchakis, P. (2001). Disassembly planning and scheduling: review and further research. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 215(5), 695-709
  8. Mascle, C. (2002). A system life-cycle model for disassembly-assembly line design. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 35(1), 103-108
  9. Mete, S., Çil, Z. A., Özceylan, E., Ağpak, K., & Battaïa, O. (2018). An optimisation support for the design of hybrid production lines including assembly and disassembly tasks. International Journal of Production Research, 1-15
  10. Murata, J., & Yura, K. (2013). Optimal Design of multistage parallel-stations systems for disassembly and sorting operations. Journal of Japan Industrial Management Association, 62(2),128-137
  11. Ohlendorf, M., Herrmann, C., & Hesselbach, J. (2004, February). Simulation-based disassembly systems design. In Environmentally Conscious Manufacturing III (Vol. 5262, pp. 94-103). International Society for Optics and Photonics
  12. Ozceylan, E., Kalayci, C. B., Güngör, A., & Gupta, S. M. (2018). Disassembly line balancing problem: a review of the state o