KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Türk Biyokimya Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 46 - Sayı: 1

Evaluation of the performance of sysmex XN-3100 automated hematology analyzer regarding the sysmex XE-2100 and microscopic examination

Said İNCİR
Kerim Erhan PALOĞLU
Sayfa
29–37
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Conclusions: The XN-3100 not only showed a strong correlation and agreement with the XE-2100 but also dis played a comparable analytical sensitivity, and increased specificity, which may result in an improved turnaround time and throughpu.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objectives: We performed a verification study of the Sys mex XN-3100 hematology analyzer in comparison with the XE-2100 according to the guidelines of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) and the International Council for Standardization in Hematology (ICSH).
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:For comparison, we used the current XE-2100 as the comparative method and analyzed 540 blood samples.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Conclusions: The XN-3100 not only showed a strong correlation and agreement with the XE-2100 but also dis played a comparable analytical sensitivity, and increased specificity, which may result in an improved turnaround time and throughpu.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Objectives: We performed a verification study of the Sys mex XN-3100 hematology analyzer in comparison with the XE-2100 according to the guidelines of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) and the International Council for Standardization in Hematology (ICSH). Materials and methods: Blood samples and quality con trol materials were used for precision. For comparison, we used the current XE-2100 as the comparative method and analyzed 540 blood samples. The Passing-Bablok and Bland-Altman tests were performed according to the CLSI EP09-A3 and a carryover study was performed according to the CLSI H26-A2 guidelines. The flagging performance of the two analyzers was compared, using two experienced laboratory technicians as the reference method. Results: The Sysmex XN-3100 demonstrated high levels of precision for most parameters. For the comparison anal ysis, all parameters, except for MCHC, monocytes and ba sophils were within the systematic error limits of desirable biological variability criterion (SeDBV). The carryover was less than 0.4% for all parameters. The flagging perfor mance of the XN-3100 was satisfactory and the overall efficiency was high. Conclusions: The XN-3100 not only showed a strong correlation and agreement with the XE-2100 but also dis played a comparable analytical sensitivity, and increased specificity, which may result in an improved turnaround time and throughpu.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

İNCİR, S., PALOĞLU, K. E. (2021). Evaluation of the performance of sysmex XN-3100 automated hematology analyzer regarding the sysmex XE-2100 and microscopic examination. Türk Biyokimya Dergisi, Cilt: 46 - Sayı: 1, 29–37. https://ajindex.com/articles/418802

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. Verbrugge SE, Huisman A. Verification and standardization of blood cell counters for routine clinical laboratory tests. [Internet] Elsevier Inc. Clin Lab Med 2015;35:183–96
  2. Tailor H, Mackie I, Mellick A, Machin S. Evaluation of the sysmex XN-550, a novel compact haematology analyser from the XN-L® series, compared to the XN-20 system. Int J Lab Hematol 2017;39: 585–9
  3. Cho YU, You E, Jang S, Park CJ. Validation of reflex testing rules and establishment of a new workflow for body fluid cell analysis using a sysmex XN-550 automatic hematology analyzer. Int J Lab Hematol 2018;40:258–67
  4. Rabinovitch A, Barnes P, Curcio KM, Dorman J, Huisman A, Nguyen L, et al. Validation, verification, and quality assurance of automated Hematology analyzers; approved atandard—aecond adition. Wayne, PA, USA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2010, vol
  5. H26-A2. ISBN 1-56238-728-6. ISSN 0273- 3099
  6. ICSH. Guidelines for evaluation of blood cell analysers including those used for differential leucocyte and reticulocyte counting and cell marker applications. Clin Lab Haematol 1994;16:157–74
  7. International Organization for Standardization. Medical laboratories particular requirements for quality and competence ISO document 15189, 2nd ed. Geneva, Switzerland: Int. Organ. Stand; 2007
  8. Pérez I, Redín ME, Vives A, Garrido A, Urrechaga E, Lacasta M. Local verification between the hematological analyzers sysmex XN-series and XE-5000. Int J Lab Hematol 2016;38:256–64
  9. Seo JY, Lee ST, Kim SH. Performance evaluation of the new hematology analyzer sysmex XN-series. Int J Lab Hematol 2015; 37:155–64
  10. Kweon OJ, Lee MK, Kim HR. Evaluation of the flagging performance of the hematology analyzer sysmex XN series on the basis of Q values. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2018;142:83–8
  11. Briggs C, Longair I, Kumar P, Singh D, Machin SJ. Performance evaluation of the sysmex haematology XN modular system. J Clin Pathol 2012;65:1024–30
  12. CLSI. Measurement procedure comparison and bias estimation using patient samples; approved guideline, 3rd ed. Wayne, PA CLSI: CLSI; 2013. Document EP09-A3
  13. Briggs C, Culp N, Davis B, d’Onofrio G, Zini G, Machin SJ. ICSH guidelines for the evaluation of blood cell analysers including those used for differential leucocyte and reticulocyte counting. Int J Lab Hematol 2014;36:613–27
  14. Broughton PMG, Gowenlock AH, McCormack JJ, Neill DW. A revised scheme for the evaluation of automatic instruments for use in clinical chemistry. Ann Cl