Dergiler / Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology / 2021 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 1

CT-guided 125I brachytherapy combined with chemotherapy for the treatment of unresectable or locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma

Sayfa
50–58
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

CONCLUSION CT-guided 125I brachytherapy is a feasible, safe, and valuable treatment for patients with unresectable PC.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:PURPOSE We aimed to explore the feasibility and clinical effectiveness of percutaneous CT-guided iodine-125 (¹²⁵I) brachytherapy combined with chemotherapy for the treatment of patients with unresectable or locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma (PC).
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:METHODS We retrospectively reviewed 66 patients with Stage III and IV PC who had received chemotherapy.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:CONCLUSION CT-guided 125I brachytherapy is a feasible, safe, and valuable treatment for patients with unresectable PC.
🔬Tür:Literatür & Derleme Çalışması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

PURPOSE We aimed to explore the feasibility and clinical effectiveness of percutaneous CT-guided iodine-125 (¹²⁵I) brachytherapy combined with chemotherapy for the treatment of patients with unresectable or locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma (PC). METHODS We retrospectively reviewed 66 patients with Stage III and IV PC who had received chemotherapy. A total of 35 (53%) patients receiving 125I brachytherapy and chemotherapy (gemcitabine + cisplatin, GP) were classified as Group A, and 31 (47%) patients who received GP chemotherapy alone were categorized as Group B. The evaluated indications were local control rate (LCR), local progression-free survival (LPFS), overall survival (OS), treatment-related complications, and the degree of symptom relief. Kaplan-Meier curves, log-rank test and Cox regression models were generated and used for further analysis to identify predictors of outcomes. RESULTS The median follow-up time was 6.00±0.84 months. The 1-, 3-, 6-, 12- and 18-month LCRs for Group A were 100% (35/35), 89.3% (25/28), 71.4% (15/21), 37.5% (3/8) and 33.3% (1/3), respectively; and those for Group B were 87.1% (27/31), 69.6% (16/23), 41.2% (7/17), 14.3% (1/7) and 0% (0/3), respectively. The LCR differed at 1-, 3- and 6-months (p = 0.032; p = 0.009; p = 0.030; respectively). The median LPFS was 7.00±0.30 months and 5.00±0.75 months for Groups A and B (p = 0.023), respectively; however, the median OS of the groups were not significantly different (8.00±0.77 months vs. 6.00±1.04 months. p = 0.917). No life-threatening complications occurred during or after the procedures. Patients in Group A experienced better pain control and relief of abdominal distension than those in Group B. CONCLUSION CT-guided 125I brachytherapy is a feasible, safe, and valuable treatment for patients with unresectable PC.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

LUO, M., CHEN, J., ZHONG, Z., ZHANG, F. J. (2021). CT-guided 125I brachytherapy combined with chemotherapy for the treatment of unresectable or locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma. Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 1, 50–58. https://ajindex.com/articles/418471

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (1)

  1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2017. CA Cancer J Clin 2017; 67:7–30. [Crossref] 2. Low G, Panu A, Millo N, Leen E. Multimodality imaging of neoplastic and nonneoplastic solid lesions of the pancreas. Radiographics 2011; 31:993–1015. [Crossref] 3. Tempero MA, Malafa MP, Al-Hawary M, et al. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma, version 2.2017, nccn clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2017; 15:1028–1061. [Crossref] 4. Brennan DD, Zamboni GA, Raptopoulos VD, Kruskal JB. Comprehensive preoperative assessment of pancreatic adenocarcinoma with 64-section volumetric CT. Radiographics 2007; 27:1653–1666. [Crossref] 5. Sultana A, Smith CT, Cunningham D, Starling N, Neoptolemos JP, Ghaneh P. Meta-analyses of chemotherapy for locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer. J Clin Oncol 2007; 25:2607–2615. [Crossref] 6. He C, Wang J, Sun S, et al. Irreversible electroporation versus radiotherapy after induction chemotherapy on survival in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer: A propensity score analysis. BMC Cancer 2019; 19:394. [Crossref] 7. Hu X, Qiu H, Zhang L, et al. Recurrent gliomas: Comparison of computed tomography (CT)-guided 125I seed implantation therapy and traditional radiochemotherapy. Cancer Biol Ther 2012; 13:840–847. [Crossref] 8. Stewart A, Parashar B, Patel M, et al. American brachytherapy society consensus guidelines for thoracic brachytherapy for lung cancer. Brachytherapy 2016; 15:1–11. [Crossref] 9. Demanes DJ, Ghilezan MI. High-dose-rate brachytherapy as monotherapy for prostate cancer. Brachytherapy 2014; 13:529–541. [Crossref] 10. Mo Z, Zhang T, Zhang Y, et al. Feasibility and clinical value of CT-guided (125)I brachytherapy for metastatic soft tissue sarcoma after firstline chemotherapy failure. Eur Radiol 2018; 28:1194–1203. [Crossref] 11. Yan H, Xiang Z, Zhong Z, et al. CT-guided (125) I brachytherapy in the treatment of distant metastases in the oral cavity and maxillofacial region. Transl Oncol 2017; 10:90–98. [Crossref] 12. Wang G, Zhang F, Yang B, et al. Feasibility and clinical value of CT-guided (125)I brachytherapy for bilateral lung recurrences from colorectal carcinoma. Radiology 2016; 278:897–905. [Crossref] 13. Zhang FJ, Li CX, Zhang L, Wu PH, Jiao DC, Duan GF. Short- to mid-term evaluation of CT-guided 125i brachytherapy on intra-hepatic recurrent tumors and/or extra-hepatic metastases after liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Biol Ther 2009; 8:585–590