KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology / 2021 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 1

Technique and clinical applications of dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography (CEDM) in breast cancer evaluation: a pictorial essay

Rashmi SUDHIR
Veeraiah KOPPULA
Anitha MANDAVA
Sannapareddy KAMALA
Alekya POTLAPALLI
Sayfa
28–36
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

We share our experience of CEDM at a tertiary care cancer hospital.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This pictorial essay illustrates an overview of the basic technique used in acquiring dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography (CEDM) images and its potential clinical applications in regular practice.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:CEDM may be used as a low-cost alternative to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), as a problem-solving tool in clinical practice and for therapeutic planning of breast cancer, which may include high-risk screening, dense breast evaluation, mammographically equivocal lesions, local staging, treatment response evaluation, and post treatment follow-up.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:We share our experience of CEDM at a tertiary care cancer hospital.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

This pictorial essay illustrates an overview of the basic technique used in acquiring dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography (CEDM) images and its potential clinical applications in regular practice. CEDM may be used as a low-cost alternative to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), as a problem-solving tool in clinical practice and for therapeutic planning of breast cancer, which may include high-risk screening, dense breast evaluation, mammographically equivocal lesions, local staging, treatment response evaluation, and post treatment follow-up. We share our experience of CEDM at a tertiary care cancer hospital.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

SUDHIR, R., KOPPULA, V., MANDAVA, A., KAMALA, S., POTLAPALLI, A. (2021). Technique and clinical applications of dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography (CEDM) in breast cancer evaluation: a pictorial essay. Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 1, 28–36. https://ajindex.com/articles/418470

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Daniaux M, Zordo T, Zantner W, et al. Dual-energy contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM). Arch Gynecol Obstet 2015
  2. 739–747. [Crossref] 2. Lobbes MB, Smidt ML, Houwers J, et al. Contrast-enhanced mammography: techniques, current results, and potential indications. Clin Radiol 2013
  3. 935–944. [Crossref] 3. Kaur M, Piccolo C, Arasaratnam S. Implementation of contrast-enhanced mammography in clinical practice. In: Nori J, Kaur M (eds). Contrast-enhanced digital mammography. 2018
  4. 57–74. [Crossref] 4. Bhimani C, Matta D, Roth RG, et al. Contrast-enhancedspectral mammography: technique, indications, and clinical applications. Acad Radiol 2017
  5. 84–88. [Crossref] 5. Rasha MK, Maha HH, Rasha W, Sahar MM, Godda I, Alieldin N. Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography: Impact of the qualitative morphology descriptors on the diagnosis of breast lesions. Eur J Radiol 2015
  6. 1049– 1055. [Crossref] 6. Łuczyńska E, Niemiec J, Hendrick E, et al. Degree of enhancement on contrast enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) and lesion type on mammography (MG): comparison based on histological results. Med Sci Monit 2016
  7. 3886–3893. [Crossref] 7. Alexander S, Dulku G, Hashoul S, Donna B T. Practical uses of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography in daily work: A pictorial review. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2019
  8. 473–478. [Crossref] 8. Mori M, Akashi-Tanaka S, Suzuki S, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography in comparison to conventional full-field digital mammography in a population of women with dense breasts. Breast Cancer 2017
  9. 104–110. [Crossref] 9. James JR, Pavlicek W, Hanson JA, Boltz TF, Patel BK. Breast radiation dose with CESM compared with 2D FFDM and 3D tomosynthesis mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2017
  10. 362–372. [Crossref] 10. Jeukens CR, Lalji UC, Meijer E, et al. Radiation exposure of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography compared with full-field digital mammography. Invest Radiol 2014
  11. 659–665. [Crossref] 11. Berg WA. Current status of supplemental screening in dense breasts. J Clin Oncol 2016
  12. 1840–1843. [Crossref] 12. Pataky R, Armstrong L, Chia S, et al. Cost-effectiveness of MRI of breast cancer screening in BRCA 1/2 mutation carriers. BMC Cancer 2013
  13. [Crossref] 13. Brill K, Germaine P, Tinney E, Hendershott K, Liao L. A retrospective comparison of contrast enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) to breast MRI in breast cancer detection: An initial study for sensitivity analysis. J Clin O