Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation / 2022 / Cilt: 50 - Sayı: 1

What About Compressing the Oesophagus with an Ultrasound Probe for a Modified Sellick Maneuver?

Sayfa
13–17
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Conclusions: Paralaryngeal pressure with an ultrasound probe has the potential to occlude the oesophagus and may be effective in all patient groups.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: Debates continue about the cricoid pressure, which has been used for many years to prevent gastric aspiration during intubation.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Compression was applied medially at a 45° angle toward the vertebral column by the ultrasound probe and oesophageal anteroposterior outer diameters were measured.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Conclusions: Paralaryngeal pressure with an ultrasound probe has the potential to occlude the oesophagus and may be effective in all patient groups.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Objective: Debates continue about the cricoid pressure, which has been used for many years to prevent gastric aspiration during intubation. Using ultrasound, the effects of this maneuver and alternatives like paralaryngeal pressure are revealed. The aim of this observational study was to determine the effect of paralaryngeal pressure with an ultrasound probe on the oesophageal diameter in patients with different body mass indexes and neck circumferences. Methods: After measuring the neck circumference at the level of the cricoid cartilage, the oesophagus was visualized by ultrasonography. Compression was applied medially at a 45° angle toward the vertebral column by the ultrasound probe and oesophageal anteroposterior outer diameters were measured. Correlations between body mass index, neck circumference, oesophageal diameter, and oesophageal diameter change ratio were evaluated with Pearson’s r value. Results: One hundred ten volunteers (52 women and 58 men) with mean age 33.7 ± 8.02 years and mean body mass index 25.6 ± 4.65 kg m−2 were recruited. The oesophagus was located 78.18% partially to the left, 4.54% completely to the left, 1.81% to the right of the cricoid ring. In 15.45%, oesophagus could not be displayed. The mean diameter of the oesophagus was 7.6 ± 1.1 mm before pressure and 5.6 ± 0.09 mm after pressure (P .05). However, weak correlation was found between diameter change percentage and neck circumference (r = −0.33; P = .016). Conclusions: Paralaryngeal pressure with an ultrasound probe has the potential to occlude the oesophagus and may be effective in all patient groups.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

BERMEDE, A. O., MEÇO, B. C., BAYTAŞ, V., DİLKEN, O., GÜÇLÜ, Ç. Y., ERKOÇ, S. K., ALANOĞLU, Z., ALKIŞ, N. (2022). What About Compressing the Oesophagus with an Ultrasound Probe for a Modified Sellick Maneuver?. Turkish Journal of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Cilt: 50 - Sayı: 1, 13–17. https://ajindex.com/articles/418337

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Sellick BA. Cricoid pressure to control regurgitation of stomach contents during induction of anaesthesia. Lancet. 1961
  2. 2(7199):404-406. [CrossRef] 2. Salem MR, Khorasani A, Zeidan A, Crystal GJ. Cricoid pressure controversies: narrative review. Anesthesiology. 2017
  3. 126(4):738-752. [CrossRef] 3. Algie CM, Mahar RK, Tan HB, Wilson G, Mahar PD, Wasiak J. Effectiveness and risks of cricoid pressure during rapid sequence induction for endotracheal intubation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015
  4. 11(11):CD011656. [CrossRef] 4. Smith KJ, Dobranowski J, Yip G, Dauphin A, Choi PT. Cricoid pressure displaces the oesophagus: an observational study using magnetic resonance imaging. Anesthesiology. 2003
  5. 99(1):60-64. [CrossRef] 5. Boet S, Duttchen K, Chan J, et al. Cricoid pressure provides incomplete oesophageal occlusion associated with lateral deviation: a magnetic resonance imaging study. J Emerg Med. 2012
  6. 42(5):606-611. [CrossRef] 6. Andruszkiewicz P, Wojtczak J, Wroblewski L, Kaczor M, Sobczyk D, Kowalik I. Ultrasound evaluation of the impact of cricoid pressure versus novel ‘paralaryngeal pressure’ on anteroposterior oesophageal diameter. Anaesthesia. 2016
  7. 71(9):1024- 1029. [CrossRef] 7. Rice MJ, Mancuso AA, Gibbs C, Morey TE, Gravenstein N, Deitte LA. Cricoid pressure results in compression of the postcricoid hypopharynx: the oesophageal position is irrelevant. Anesth Analg. 2009
  8. 109(5):1546-1552. [CrossRef] 8. Smith KJ, Ladak S, Choi PT, Dobranowski J. The cricoid cartilage and the oesophagus are not aligned in close to half of adult patients. Can J Anaesth. 2002
  9. 49(5):503-507. [CrossRef] 9. Tsung JW, Fenster D, Kessler DO, Novik J. Dynamic anatomic relationship of the oesophagus and trachea on sonography: implications for endotracheal tube confirmation in children. J Ultrasound Med. 2012
  10. 31(9):1365-1370. [CrossRef] 10. Kei J, Utschig EE, van Tonder RJ. Using ultrasonography to assess the effectiveness of cricoid pressure on oesophageal compression. J Emerg Med. 2017
  11. 53(2):236-240. [CrossRef] 11. Salem MR, Khorasani A, Zeidan AM, Crystal GJ. Cricoid pressure controversies: narrative review. Anesthesiology. 2017
  12. 126(4):738-752. [CrossRef] 12. Zeidan AM, Salem MR, Mazoit JX, Abdullah MA, Ghattas T, Crystal GJ. The effectiveness of cricoid pressure for occluding the oesophageal entrance in anesthetized and paralyzed patients: an experimental and observational glidescope study. Anesth Analg. 2014
  13. 118(3):580-586. [CrossRef] 13. Kim H, Chang JE, Won D, et al. The eff