Dergiler / Turkish Thoracic Journal / 2016 / Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 1

Can a Computer-Based Prescription of Free Medication Increase Smoking Cessation Rates Efficiently?

Sayfa
15–21
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The most important factor increasing quitting rates at the end of six months and one year was found to be advanced age

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:OBJECTIVES: In 2011, in the context of a research project, bupropion and varenicline were distributed to smoking cessation clinics by the Ministry of Health of Turkey to be prescribed free of charge by a computer-based system.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:In the present study, we compared smoking cessation rates between patients who were prescribed free medications during the period of the project and those who had to pay for their medication.MATERIAL AND METHODS: Six hundred four patients who applied during the project period were given either bupropion or varenicline, which were prescribed using an algorithm-based computer system.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The most important factor increasing quitting rates at the end of six months and one year was found to be advanced age
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2011 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

OBJECTIVES: In 2011, in the context of a research project, bupropion and varenicline were distributed to smoking cessation clinics by the Ministry of Health of Turkey to be prescribed free of charge by a computer-based system. In the present study, we compared smoking cessation rates between patients who were prescribed free medications during the period of the project and those who had to pay for their medication.MATERIAL AND METHODS: Six hundred four patients who applied during the project period were given either bupropion or varenicline, which were prescribed using an algorithm-based computer system. Three hundred sixteen patients who applied after that period were prescribed medicines deemed appropriate by the attending physician but had to pay for the medication on their own. Follow-up visits were arranged for one year. Carbon monoxide (CO) levels in the expired air were used as indicators of cessation.RESULTS: A total of 537 patients began treatment, of which 438 (81.6%) applied during the first period (group 1) and 99 (18.4%) applied during the second period (group 2). The mean age and concomitant disease presence were higher in the second-period patients (p< 0.05). Advanced age, comorbidities, pathological findings in spirometry, and chest X-ray were also higher in those who paid for the cost of their treatment (p= 0.009, 0.001, 0.006, 0.001, respectively). Smoking cessation rates were found to be 14.8% and 27.3% after six months (p= 0.008) and 10.7% and 18.2% after one year (p= 0.059), respectively, for group 1 and group 2. Age, dependence score, cigarettes smoked (as pack-years), and percentage of patients who paid for the treatment were found to be significantly higher (p< 0.001, 0.021, 0.018, 0.001, respectively) for those who quit smoking at the end of six months. For the patients who quit smoking at the end of one year, age was found to be significantly higher (p= 0.008), and the number of males was higher, although the difference was not statistically significant (p= 0.05). When logistic regression analysis was applied, age, dependence score, and paid treatment were found to be independent variables (p= 0.002, 0.008, 0.012, respectively) for those who quit smoking at the end of six months. Only age was found to be an independent variable for those who quit smoking at the end of one year (p= 0.029).CONCLUSION: More smokers could receive treatment by the distribution of free drugs. However, quitting rates at the end of six months were higher when patients had to pay for their treatment. On the other hand, quitting rates at the end of one year were not affected by whether the treatment was paid for or free of charge. The most important factor increasing quitting rates at the end of six months and one year was found to be advanced age

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

SALEPÇİ, B., FİDAN, A., ÇAĞLAYAN, B., PARMAKSIZ, E. T., KIRAL, N., CÖMERT, S. Ş., GÜNGÖR, G. A., SALEPCİ, E. (2016). Can a Computer-Based Prescription of Free Medication Increase Smoking Cessation Rates Efficiently?. Turkish Thoracic Journal, Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 1, 15–21. https://ajindex.com/articles/418143

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (8)

  1. Cooper J, Borland R, Yong HH. Australian smokers increasingly use help to quit, but 2002-09. Aust N Z J Public Health 2011
  2. [CrossRef] 2. Collins GB, Jerry JM, Bales R. Quitting smoking: Still a challenge, newer tools show promise. CCJM 2015
  3. [CrossRef] 3. Fiore MC. A Clinical Practice Guideline Treating for Tobacco Use and Dependence: A US Public Health Service Report. JAMA 2000
  4. [CrossRef] 4. Fiore MC, Jae´n CR, Baker TB, et al. Treating Tobacco Use and Dependence: 2008 Update. Clinical Practice Guideline. Rockville,MD: US Department of Health and Human Services. Public Health Service
  5. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ books/NBK63942/#A28360 Last accessed: 12 September 2013. 5. Riesco Miranda JA, Jimenez Ruiz CA, Serrano Rebollo JC. Smoking Cessation: Update. Clin Pulm Med 2013
  6. [CrossRef] 6. Zwar NA, Mendelsohn CP, Richmond RL. Supporting smoking cessation. BMJ 2014
  7. f7535. [CrossRef] 7. Cahill K, Stevens S, Perera R, Lancaster T. Pharmacological interventions for smoking cessation: an overview and network meta-analysis (Review). The Cochrane Library 2013
  8. Available from: http://www.cochranelibrary.com/ Last accessed: 15 October 2013. [CrossRef] 8. Who Report on the Global Tobacco Epidemic, 2011: Warning about dangers of tobacco. Offer help to quit tobacco use. p 46-49. Available from: http://whqlibdoc.who.int/ publications/2011/9789240687813_eng.pdf. Last accessed: 13 September 2013. [CrossRef] 9. T.C. Sağlık Bakanlığı Türkiye Halk Sağlığı Kurumu. Küresel Yetişkin Tütün Araştırması, Türkiye 2012. Erişim linki: www. halksagligiens.hacettepe.edu.tr/KYTA_TR.pdf. [CrossRef] 10. Who Report on the Global Tobacco Epidemic, 2013: Enforcing bans on tobacco advertising, promotion and sponsorship. Turkey marks singular achievement in tobacco control. p 46-47. Available from: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/85380/1/9789241505871_ eng.pdf. Last accessed: 13 September 2013. [CrossRef] 11. T.C. Sağlık Bakanlığı Ulusal Tütün Kontrol Programı ve Eylem Planı 2008-2012. Erişim linki: http://www. sigarabirakmadaogrenmezemini.org/media/downloads/ Ulusal_Tutun_Kontrol.pdf. [CrossRef] 12. Sağlık Bakanlığı sigara bırakma tedavisi destek programı. Ankara Sigara Bırakma Merkezleri Platformu Ağustos 2010-Şubat 2011. Erişim linki: http://www.ssuk.org.tr/eski_ site_verileri/pdf/14Haz2011_SigaraBirakmaTedavisi.pdf. [CrossRef] 13. Heatherton TF, Kozlowski LT, Frecker RC, Fagerström KO. The Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Depend