Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation / 2022 / Cilt: 50 - Sayı: 1

Comparison of Success Rates of Different Methods of Ultrasound-Guided Radial Artery Cannulation (Short-Axis and Long-Axis Methods) Against the Traditional Palpatory Method: A Prospective Randomized Study

Sayfa
52–58
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Conclusions: We conclude that the ultrasound-guided short-axis method of radial artery cannulation is associated with higher first-attempt success rate compared to the traditional palpatory method.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: Recent meta-analysis comparing the success rates of various methods of arterial cannulation in adult patients found heterogeneity in the available data.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Hence, we did this study to evaluate and compare the success rate of palpatory method with that of ultrasound guided methods of radial artery cannulation.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Conclusions: We conclude that the ultrasound-guided short-axis method of radial artery cannulation is associated with higher first-attempt success rate compared to the traditional palpatory method.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Objective: Recent meta-analysis comparing the success rates of various methods of arterial cannulation in adult patients found heterogeneity in the available data. Hence, we did this study to evaluate and compare the success rate of palpatory method with that of ultrasound guided methods of radial artery cannulation. The aim is to compare the first-attempt success rate of the palpatory method with that of ultrasound-guided radial artery cannulation techniques, namely, the short-axis out-of-plane and the long-axis in-plane methods. Methods: This is a prospective, randomized, parallel-arm study. Ninety patients aged from 18 to 50 years (presenting for various surgeries requiring radial artery cannulation for invasive blood pressure monitoring or frequent arterial blood gas analysis) were divided into 3 groups. Each group had one of the 3 techniques of radial arterial cannulation, namely palpatory, short-axis ultrasound method, and long-axis ultrasound method. The parameters analyzed were first-attempt success rate, number of attempts needed, cannulation time, need for crossover of technique, and incidence of complications. Multivariate analysis was done with one-way ANOVA, with Tukey's post hoc test. For categorical data, the chi-square test was used. The probability value of .05 was considered as a significant level. Results: The first-attempt success rate was 76.7% in the long-axis method, 86.7% in the short-axis method, and 56.7% in the palpatory method. The short-axis method has been shown to have a shorter cannulation time, fewer attempts needed for successful cannulation, and lower need for crossover of techniques when the first 2 attempts fail. Conclusions: We conclude that the ultrasound-guided short-axis method of radial artery cannulation is associated with higher first-attempt success rate compared to the traditional palpatory method.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

RAJASEKAR, M., SUKUMAR, S., SELVARAJ, V. (2022). Comparison of Success Rates of Different Methods of Ultrasound-Guided Radial Artery Cannulation (Short-Axis and Long-Axis Methods) Against the Traditional Palpatory Method: A Prospective Randomized Study. Turkish Journal of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Cilt: 50 - Sayı: 1, 52–58. https://ajindex.com/articles/418103

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (2)

  1. Mark JB, Slaughter TF. Cardiovascular monitoring. In: Miller RD, ed, Miller's Anesthesia. 6 th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Churchill Livingstone; 2004:1272-1273
  2. Brzezinski M, Luisetti T, London MJ. Radial artery cannulation: a comprehensive review of recent anatomic and physiologic investigations. Anesth Analg. 2009;109(6):1763-1781. [CrossRef] 3. White L, Halpin A, Turner M, Wallace L. Ultrasound-guided radial artery cannulation in adult and paediatric populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2016;116(5):610-617. [CrossRef] 4. Miller AG, Bardin AJ. Review of ultrasound-guided radial artery catheter placement. Respir Care. 2016;61(3):383-388. [CrossRef] 5. Bhattacharjee S, Maitra S, Baidya DK. Comparison between ultrasound guided technique and digital palpation technique for radial artery cannulation in adult patients: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Clin Anesth. 2018;47:54-59. [CrossRef] 6. Wilson C, Rose D, Kelen GD, Billioux V, Bright L. Comparison of ultrasound-guided vs traditional arterial cannulation by emergency medicine residents. West J Emerg Med. 2020;21(2):353- 358. [CrossRef] 7. Anantasit N, Cheeptinnakorntaworn P, Khositseth A, Lertbunrian R, Chantra M. Ultrasound versus traditional palpation to guide radial artery cannulation in critically ill children: a randomized trial. J Ultrasound Med. 2017;36(12):2495-2501. [CrossRef] 8. Moussa Pacha H, Alahdab F, Al-Khadra Y, et al. Ultrasoundguided versus palpation-guided radial artery catheterization in adult population: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am Heart J. 2018;204:1-8. [CrossRef] 9. Gu WJ, Tie HT, Liu JC, Zeng XT. Efficacy of ultrasoundguided radial artery catheterization: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Crit Care. 2014;18(3):R93. [CrossRef] 10. Peters C, Schwarz SKW, Yarnold CH, Kojic K, Kojic S, Head SJ. Ultrasound guidance versus direct palpation for radial artery catheterization by expert operators: a randomized trial among Canadian cardiac anesthesiologists. Can J Anaesth. 2015;62(11):1161-1168. [CrossRef] 11. Quan Z, Tian M, Chi P, Cao Y, Li X, Peng K. Modified shortaxis out-of-plane ultrasound Versus conventional long-axis inplane ultrasound to guide radial artery cannulation: a randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg. 2014;119(1):163-169. [CrossRef] 12. Kim SY, Lee JS, Kim WO, Sun JM, Kwon MK, Kil HK. Evaluation of radial and ulnar blood flow after ra