Dergiler / Turkish Thoracic Journal / 2016 / Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 4

Management of Massive Hemoptysis: Analyses of 58 Patients

Sayfa
148–152
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Surgical treatment remains the definitive therapy in the management of massive hemoptysis with decreased mortality rates over decades; whereas bronchial artery embolization is an effective therapeutic tool.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:OBJECTIVES: The objective was to describe changing patterns of etiological factors and treatment modalities for massive hemoptysis.MATERIAL AND METHODS: From January 2008-December 2012, the medical records of 58 massive hemoptysis patients were reviewed.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients, 44 were men (75.9%) and 14 were women (24.1%), with a mean age of 51.4 years (range= 19-84 years), were divided into three groups; surgical management (n= 37, 63.8%), conservative management (n= 14, 24.1%) and bronchial artery embolization (n= 6, 10.4%).
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Surgical treatment remains the definitive therapy in the management of massive hemoptysis with decreased mortality rates over decades; whereas bronchial artery embolization is an effective therapeutic tool.
🔬Tür:Literatür & Derleme Çalışması
📍Kapsam:2008 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

OBJECTIVES: The objective was to describe changing patterns of etiological factors and treatment modalities for massive hemoptysis.MATERIAL AND METHODS: From January 2008-December 2012, the medical records of 58 massive hemoptysis patients were reviewed. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients, 44 were men (75.9%) and 14 were women (24.1%), with a mean age of 51.4 years (range= 19-84 years), were divided into three groups; surgical management (n= 37, 63.8%), conservative management (n= 14, 24.1%) and bronchial artery embolization (n= 6, 10.4%). One case (1.7%) had combined treatment modality; bronchial artery embolization was followed by surgical resection. Anatomical lung resections were the most preferred resection type in the surgical management group (n= 34, 91.9%). The most common etiological factor was bronchiectasis (n= 19, 32.8%); followed by bronchial cancer (n= 14, 24.1%). The duration of hospitalization in the surgical management group was 11.4 days ; whereas in the bronchial artery embolization group, hospitalization was only four days (p< 0.01). Prolonged air leak (n= 7; 18.9%) was the most common complication in the surgical management group.CONCLUSION: We emphasize that bronchiectasis was leading cause of massive hemoptysis. Surgical treatment remains the definitive therapy in the management of massive hemoptysis with decreased mortality rates over decades; whereas bronchial artery embolization is an effective therapeutic tool.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

YAZICIOĞLU, A., YEKELER, E., YAZICI, Ü., AYDIN, E., TAŞTEPE, İ., KARAOĞLANOĞLU, N. (2016). Management of Massive Hemoptysis: Analyses of 58 Patients. Turkish Thoracic Journal, Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 4, 148–152. https://ajindex.com/articles/418079

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (1)

  1. Joughon J, Ballester M, Delcambre F, et al. Massive hemoptysis: what place for medical and surgical treatment. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2002;22:345-51. [CrossRef] 2. Ayed A. Pulmonary resection for massive hemoptysis of benign etiology. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2003;24:689-93. [CrossRef] 3. Shigemura N, Wan IY, Yu SC, et al. Multidisciplinary management of life-threatening massive hemoptysis: a 10-year experience. Ann Thorac Surg 2009;87:849-53. [CrossRef] 4. Endo S, Otani S, Saito N, et al. Management of massive hemoptysis in a thoracic surgical unit. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2003;23:467- 72. [CrossRef] 5. Garzon AA, Gourin A. Surgical management of massive hemoptysis. A ten-year experience. Ann Surg 1978;187:267-71. [CrossRef] 6. Conlan AA, Hurwitz SS, Krige L, et al. Massive hemoptysis. Review of 123 cases. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1983;85:120-4. [CrossRef] 7. Unsal E, Koksal D, Cimen F, et al. Analyses of patients with hemoptysis in a reference hospital for chest disease. Tuberk Toraks 2006;54:34-42. [CrossRef] 8. Ozgul MA, Turna A, Yıldız P, et al. Risk factors and recurrence patterns in 203 patients with hemoptysis. Tuberk Toraks 2006;54:243-8. [CrossRef] 9. Knott-Craig CJ, Oostruizen JG, Rossouw G, et al. Management and prognosis of massive hemoptysis. Recent experience with 120 patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1993;105:394-7. [CrossRef] 10. Lee TW, Wan S, Choy DK, et al. Management of massive hemoptysis: a single institution experience. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000;6:232-5. [CrossRef] 11. Ong TH, Eng P. Massive hemoptysis requiring intensive care. Intensive Care Med 2003;29:317-20. [CrossRef] 12. Metin M, Sayar A, Turna A, et al. Emergency surgery for massive haemoptysis. Acta Chir Belg 2005;105:639-43. 13. Remy J, Voisin C, Dupius C, et al. Treatment of hemoptysis by embolization of the systemic circulation. Ann Radiol 1974;17:5- 16. 14. Swanson KL, Johnson CM, Prakash UB, et al. Bronchial artery embolization: experience with 54 patients. Chest 2002;121:789- 95. 15. Mal H, Rullon I, Mellot F, et al. Immediate and long-term results of bronchial artery embolization for life-threatening hemoptysis. Chest 1999;115:996-1001. 16. Samara KD, Tsetis D, Antoniou KM, et al. Bronchial artery embolization for management of massive cryptogenic hemoptysis: a case series. J Med Case Rep 2011;5:58-62