Dergiler / Selcuk Journal of Agriculture and Food Sciences / 2022 / Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 1

Determination of Morphological Characteristics of Some Prominent Tomato Genotypes

Sayfa
106–113
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

A high degree of morphological variation was detected among tomato genotypes.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This study was carried out to determine some morphological characteristics of 94 tomato genotypes at the S4 level and to reveal the relationships between these materials.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:As a result of the phenotypic assessment, the maximum fruit weight values of the genotypes were observed as in G9 (317.59 g), G54 (310 g), G92 (292.85 g), G70 (287.01 g), and G110 (276.66 g); and the lowest fruit weight values were observed in G26 (18.302 g) and G8 (14.48 g).
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:A high degree of morphological variation was detected among tomato genotypes.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

This study was carried out to determine some morphological characteristics of 94 tomato genotypes at the S4 level and to reveal the relationships between these materials. In the study, leaf attitude, leaf length, leaf width, number of flowers, fruit color, fruit weight, fruit width, fruit length, the thickness of pericarp, fruit shape, fruit diameter, number of locules, and total soluble solid content (TTSC) were measured and observed in these genotypes. As a result of the phenotypic assessment, the maximum fruit weight values of the genotypes were observed as in G9 (317.59 g), G54 (310 g), G92 (292.85 g), G70 (287.01 g), and G110 (276.66 g); and the lowest fruit weight values were observed in G26 (18.302 g) and G8 (14.48 g). Average fruit length, fruit width, pericarp thickness, and the number of carpels were recorded (69.09 mm, 56.90 mm, 6.37 mm, and 4 carpels respectively). Tomato genotypes were also investigated using Cluster and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) method based on these measurements and observations. As a result of this analysis, five independent principal component axes were obtained. While these axes represent 69.28% of the total variation, the eigen values were ranged between 1.06 and 4.02. According to the PCA analysis results, genotypes G7, G81, G93, and G103 were prominent in terms of leaf length, fruit width, fruit weight, and carpel number parameters. Based on TSSC results, the G65 genotype was found to be the most prominent one, and the genotypes G12 and G114 exhibit promising results for fruit color. A high degree of morphological variation was detected among tomato genotypes.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KAYAK, N., KIYMACI, G., KAL, Ü., DAL, Y., TÜRKMEN, Ö. (2022). Determination of Morphological Characteristics of Some Prominent Tomato Genotypes. Selcuk Journal of Agriculture and Food Sciences, Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 1, 106–113. https://ajindex.com/articles/418001

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (9)

  1. Altıntaş S, Polat S and Şahin N (2016). Marmara Bölgesi'nden Toplanan Domates Popülasyonlarının Moleküler ve Morfolojik Karakterizasyonunun Belirlenmesi. (B. B. Bölümü, ed.), NKU.BAP.00.24.AR.14.22. Ayyıldız M (2017). Domates ıslahında nitelikli saf hatlarda morfolojik karakterizasyon ve heterotik etkilerin belirlenmesi, Selçuk Üniversitesi,
  2. Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü. Bernousi I, Emami A, Tajbakhsh M, Darvishzadeh R and Henareh M (2011). Studies on Genetic Variability and Correlation among the Different Traits in Solanum lycopersicum L. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca 39, 152-158.
  3. Bhattarai K, Sharma S and Panthee DR (2018). Diversity among Modern Tomato Genotypes at Different Levels in Fresh-Market Breeding. Hindawi Publishing Corporation International Journal of Agronomy, 15. Bota J, Conesa MÀ, Ochogavia JM, Medrano H, Francis DM and Cifre J (2014). Characterization of a landrace collection for Tomàtiga de Ramellet (Solanum lycopersicum L.) from the Balearic Islands. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 61, 1131-1146.
  4. Çukadar K and Dursun A (2012). Erzincan ili Domates Genotiplerinin Morfolojik Karakterizasyonu. In "9. Ulusal Sebze Sempozyumu Konya" (P. D. Ö. Türkmen, R. A. S. Sabır and U. M. Seymen, eds.), pp. 116-124.
  5. Danin-Poleg Y and Reis N (2001). Development and characterization of microsatellite markers in Cucumis. Theoretical and Applied Genetics Genetics 102, 61-72.
  6. Evgenidis G, Traka-Mavrona E and Koutsika-Sotiriou M (2011). Principal Component and Cluster Analysis as a Tool in the Assessment of Tomato Hybrids and Cultivars. International Journal of Agronomy 2011, 7. FAO (2019).http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC. Figàs MR, Prohens J, Raigón MD, Fernández-de-Córdova P, Fita A and Soler S (2014). Characterization of a collection of local varieties of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) using conventional descriptors and the high-throughput phenomics tool Tomato Analyzer. Genet Resour Crop Evol 62, 189-204.
  7. Gözen V (2008). Hıyarda (Cucumis sativus L.) örtüaltı yetiştiriciliğine uygun hibrit çeşit ıslahında morfolojik karakterizasyon, hibrit kombinasyonları ile hibrit tohum verim ve kalitesinin belirlenmesi, Ankara Üniversitesi,
  8. Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü. Henareh M, Dursun A and Mandoulakani BA (2015). Genetic diversity in tomato landraces collected from Turkey and Iran revealed by morphological character. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum-Hortorum Cultus 14, 87-96.
  9. Jenkins JA (1948). The origin of the cultivated tomato. Econ. Bot. 2, 379-39