Dergiler / Turkish Thoracic Journal / 2021 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 6

Persistent Ambient Air Pollution in Turkey: A 4-Year Analysis

Sayfa
482–488
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

On the contrary, air pollution has been found to gain permanency in certain provinces, and air quality monitoring has been inadequate due to insufficient measurement activities of some of the stations.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:OBJECTIVE: Ambient air pollution is an important cause of morbidity and mortality for both individual and public health.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:This study aims to demonstrate Turkey's air quality in terms of particulate matter in the last 4 years.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:On the contrary, air pollution has been found to gain permanency in certain provinces, and air quality monitoring has been inadequate due to insufficient measurement activities of some of the stations.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2016 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

OBJECTIVE: Ambient air pollution is an important cause of morbidity and mortality for both individual and public health. The major contaminant that creates air pollution in Turkey is particulate matter. This study aims to demonstrate Turkey's air quality in terms of particulate matter in the last 4 years. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this descriptive study, the public data of the National Air Quality Monitoring Network between the years 2016 and 2019 were analyzed for particulate matter (PM10). Stations with less than 75% data throughout the year were excluded from the evaluation while calculating the annual average values. The averages of the years were compared statistically with each other. RESULTS: For 111 stations that made sufficient measurements for 4 years, the annual median value of particulate matter remained constant in 12 stations (10.8%), increased in 26 stations (23.4%), and decreased in 73 stations (65.7%). The level of air pollution at 18 stations has been sustained for 4 years. It has been observed that there is no significant improvement in the criterion that the daily average PM10 level should not be higher than 50 μg/m3 for more than 35 days, and pollution is detected above the limit value permitted by the World Health Organization in all provinces and stations except a few provinces every year. Finally, during the 4-year observation, the number of stations that did not make sufficient measurements throughout the year has been found to increase over the years. CONCLUSION: Our data reveal that the air pollution attributable to particulate matter in Turkey between the years 2016 and 2019 did not regress prominently. On the contrary, air pollution has been found to gain permanency in certain provinces, and air quality monitoring has been inadequate due to insufficient measurement activities of some of the stations.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

AYKAÇ, N., YASİN, Y. (2021). Persistent Ambient Air Pollution in Turkey: A 4-Year Analysis. Turkish Thoracic Journal, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 6, 482–488. https://ajindex.com/articles/417923

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (7)

  1. World Health Organization (WHO). Ambient air pollution: a global assessment of exposure and burden of disease. 2016. Geneva: WHO Publications. Available at: https://ap ps.wh o.int / iris /bits tream /hand le/10 665/2 50141 /9789 24151 1353- eng.p df?se quenc e=1&i sAllo wed=y, Accessed July 2, 2021
  2. Brook RD, Rajagopalan S, Pope CA III, et al. Particulate matter air pollution and cardiovascular disease: an update to the scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2010;121(21):2331-2378. [CrossRef] 3. De Leeuw F, Horálek J. Quantifying the health impacts of ambient air pollution: methodology and input data ETC/ACM Technical Paper 2016/5. European Topic Centre on Air Pollution and Climate Change Mitigation Technical Report. 2017. Available at: https://ww w.eio net.e uropa.eu/e tcs/e tc-at ni/pr oduct s/etc -atni -repo rts/e tcacm tp_2 016_5 aq_h ia_me thodo logy
  3. Yu JZ, Huang XH, Ho SS, Bian Q. Nonpolar organic compounds in fine particles: quantification by thermal desorption- GC/MS and evidence for their significant oxidation in ambient aerosols in Hong Kong. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2011;401(10):3125- 3139. [CrossRef] 5. Fattore E, Paiano V, Borgini A, et al. Human health risk in relation to air quality in two municipalities in an industrialized area of Northern Italy. Environ Res. 2011;111(8):1321-1327. [CrossRef] 6. Nazarenko Y, Pal D, Ariya PA. Air quality standards for the concentration of particulate matter 2.5, global descriptive analysis. Bull World Health Organ. 2021;99(2):125-137D. [CrossRef] 7. Çapraz Ö, Deniz A, Doğan N. Effects of air pollution on respiratory hospital admissions in Istanbul, Turkey, 2013-2015. Chemosphere. 2017;181:544-550. [CrossRef] 8. Tosun E. The Evaluation of Turkey’s Air Quality Data Between 2009 and 2016 [Master’s thesis]. Ankara: Hacettepe University; 2017
  4. Bayram H. Air pollution problem in Turkey: sources, measures taken and the present status. Turk Thorac J. 2005;6:159-165
  5. Tecer LH, Tomaç N, Karaca F, et al. The evaluation of the effect of air pollution on the health status of children in Zonguldak City, Turkey. Int J Environ Pol. 2009;39(3/4):352-364. [CrossRef] 11. Tağıl Ş, Menteşe S. Spatial and temporal variations of selected respiratory diseases in relation to air pollution in Zonguldak. Balıkesir Univ J Soc Sci Ins. 2012;15(27):3-18
  6. Zeydan Ö. Assessment of particulate matter (PM10) pollution in Turkey in 2019. J Inst Sci Tech. 2021;11(1):106-118
  7. Arslan O, Akyü