Dergiler / Turkish Thoracic Journal / 2021 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 2

Comparative Analysis of Three Different Drug Distribution Schemes for Smoking Cessation

Sayfa
110–117
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Paying for the medication, lower dependency score, and longer treatment duration increased smoking cessation success independently.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the success rate of 3 different drug prescription policies: Free drugs with online system pre scription, free drugs with doctor’s prescription, and drugs paid for by patients with doctor’s prescription.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:MATERIAL AND METHODS: The effect of 2 different Ministry of Health (MoH) projects with free-of-charge and self-payment pharmaco therapies for smoking cessation were compared.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Paying for the medication, lower dependency score, and longer treatment duration increased smoking cessation success independently.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the success rate of 3 different drug prescription policies: Free drugs with online system pre scription, free drugs with doctor’s prescription, and drugs paid for by patients with doctor’s prescription. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The effect of 2 different Ministry of Health (MoH) projects with free-of-charge and self-payment pharmaco therapies for smoking cessation were compared. Patients who completed 6 months of pharmacotherapy and follow-up were evaluated. The first period was free-of-charge medication, which was determined by an online system, the following period was the self-payment period, and the third period was free medication, which was prescribed by a doctor. In all the groups, smoking habits in pack years and comorbidities of the patients were recorded, and pulmonary function tests (PFTs) and expiratory carbon dioxide (CO2) measurements were performed. Patients who had an expiratory CO2 level >5 ppm at the control visits were accepted as quitters. RESULTS: A total of 829 patients with 438 patients in the first free-of-charge period (group 1), 111 in the self-payment period (group 2), and 280 in the second free-of-charge period (group 3) were enrolled in the study. Smoking cessation rates were significantly higher in the self-payment medication group (25%) according to the MoH’s free-of-charge project groups. There was no difference in smoking cessation rates between the 2 free-of-charge medication project groups (15% in group 1 and 11% of group 3). Among all the patients, we compared 124 patients who quit smoking with 705 patients who did not. The quitters were older, mostly male, and heavier smokers. In addition, the number of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and obstructive PFT rates were higher among the quitters. Their dependency score, PFTs, and the use of free medication was lower, and treatment duration was longer. Independent factors that increased smoking cessation success were longer treatment duration, lower dependency score, and self-payment of medication. CONCLUSION: Free medications provided via 2 different modalities did not increase the smoking cessation success. Paying for the medication, lower dependency score, and longer treatment duration increased smoking cessation success independently.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

SALEPÇİ, B., ÖZDOĞAN, S., ALTUNOK, E. Ç., NAZİROĞLU, T., KIRAL, N., PARMAKSIZ, E. T., FİDAN, A., SAĞMEN, S. B., DOĞAN, C., CÖMERT, S. Ş. (2021). Comparative Analysis of Three Different Drug Distribution Schemes for Smoking Cessation. Turkish Thoracic Journal, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 2, 110–117. https://ajindex.com/articles/417919

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (5)

  1. Eriksen M, Mackay J, Schluger N, et al. The Tobacco Atlas: Fifth Edition. American Cancer Society Inc 2015
  2. Collins GB, Jerry JM, Bales R. Quitting smoking: still a challenge, newer tools show promise. Cleve Clin J Med 2015;82:39- 48. [CrossRef] 3. Fiore MC, Bailey WC, Cohen SJ, et al. A Clinical Practice Guideline Treating for Tobacco Use and Dependence: A US Public Health Service Report. The Tobacco Use and Dependence Clinical Practice Guideline Panel, Staff, and Consortium Representatives. JAMA 2000;283:3244-54. [CrossRef] 4. Fiore MC, Jae’n CR, Baker TB, et al. Treating Tobacco Use and Dependence: 2008 Update. Clinical Practice Guideline. Rockville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services. Public Health Service; 2008. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/ NBK63942/#A28360
  3. Riesco Miranda JA, Jimenez Ruiz CA, Serrano Rebollo JC. Smoking Cessation: Update. Clin Pulm Med 2013;20:129-36. [CrossRef] 6. Cahill K, Stevens S, Perera R, Lancaster, T. Pharmacological interventions for smoking cessation: an overwiew and network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013;CD009329. Available from: http//www.tecochranelibrary.com [CrossRef] 7. Zwar NA, Mendelsohn CP, Richmond RL. Supporting smoking cessation. BMJ 2014;348:f7535. [CrossRef] 8. Stead LF, Koilpillai P, Fanshawe TR, Lancaster T. Combined pharmacotherapy and behavioural interventions for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016;3:CD008286. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008286.pub3. [CrossRef] 9. Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Manual System Publication 100-04 Medicare Claims Processing Transmittal 1511, 2008.
  4. Barker D, Rigotti NA, Bentz CJ, et al. Reimbursement for smoking cessation therapy. A Healthcare Practitioner’s Guide. Third Edition.
  5. Global Adult Tobacco Survey (GATS) Turkey 2012. http://www. who.int/tobacco/surveillance/survey/gats/gats_turkey_2012_ fact_sheet_may_2013.pdf?ua=1 12. TC Sağlık Bakanlığı Ulusal Tütün Kontrol Programı ve Eylem Planı 2008-2012 https://sbu.saglik.gov.tr/Ekutuphane/kitaplar/ t15.pdf 13. Who Report on the Global Tobacco Epidemic, 2013: Enforcing bans on tobacco advertising, promotion and sponsorship. Turkey marks singular achievement in tobacco control.p 46-47. http:// apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/85380/1/9789241505871_ eng.pdf 14. Ulusal Tütün Kontrol Programı Eylem Planı 2015-2018. https: