Dergiler / Turkish Thoracic Journal / 2021 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 6

Comparison of the Therapeutic Effects of a Pigtail Catheter and Chest Tube in the Treatment of Spontaneous Pneumothorax: A Randomized Clinical Trial Study

Sayfa
459–465
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

CONCLUSION: Pigtail catheters might be as effective as chest tubes for treating patients with SP in terms of lung re-expansion.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the therapeutic effects of a pigtail catheter with a chest tube in the management of patients with spontaneous pneumothorax (SP).
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:MATERIAL AND METHODS: A randomized controlled trial study was performed on patients with SP from August 2016 to December 2017 at Imam Reza Hospital, Tabriz, Iran.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:CONCLUSION: Pigtail catheters might be as effective as chest tubes for treating patients with SP in terms of lung re-expansion.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2016 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the therapeutic effects of a pigtail catheter with a chest tube in the management of patients with spontaneous pneumothorax (SP). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A randomized controlled trial study was performed on patients with SP from August 2016 to December 2017 at Imam Reza Hospital, Tabriz, Iran. Forty-four patients were randomly assigned into 2 groups: group A with a 14-Fr pigtail catheter and group B using a 28-Fr chest tube. Two patients were excluded from the study. RESULTS: Forty-two patients participated in the study with 21 patients in each group. There were no significant differences between the groups in the patients’ baseline data. The success rate was higher in patients with pigtail catheters (85.7%) than in patients with chest tubes (76.2%). However, the difference was not significant (P = .43). The procedure time was significantly shorter in the pigtail group compared to the chest tube group (P < .01). According to the visual analog scale (VAS), patients with pigtail catheters experienced milder pain during tube insertion than patients with chest tubes (P = .02). However, the pain score at the insertion site was not significantly different between the 2 groups for the first 2 days after the procedure. Patients with pigtail catheters experienced significantly less pain than patients with chest tubes during removal of the tube (P < .01). Also, there was no significant difference between the pain experienced by the 2 groups at the time of hospital discharge (P = .19). Analgesic drug usage was lower in patients with pigtail catheters compared to patients with chest tubes (P < .01). There was a trend toward lower median hospital stays demonstrated by patients with pigtail catheters compared to patients with chest tubes (P = .2). CONCLUSION: Pigtail catheters might be as effective as chest tubes for treating patients with SP in terms of lung re-expansion.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

RASİHASHEMİ, S. Z., RAMOUZ, A., AMİNİ, H. (2021). Comparison of the Therapeutic Effects of a Pigtail Catheter and Chest Tube in the Treatment of Spontaneous Pneumothorax: A Randomized Clinical Trial Study. Turkish Thoracic Journal, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 6, 459–465. https://ajindex.com/articles/417903

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (16)

  1. Chang SH, Kang YN, Chiu HY, Chiu YH. A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing pigtail catheter and chest tube as the initial treatment for pneumothorax. Chest. 2018
  2. 153(5):1201- 1212. [CrossRef] 2. Brown SGA, Ball EL, Perrin K, et al. Conservative versus interventional treatment for spontaneous pneumothorax. N Engl J Med. 2020
  3. 382(5):405-415. [CrossRef] 3. Bobbio A, Dechartres A, Bouam S, et al. Epidemiology of spontaneous pneumothorax: gender-related differences. Thorax. 2015
  4. 70(7):653-658. [CrossRef] 4. Noppen M. Spontaneous pneumothorax: epidemiology, pathophysiology and cause. Eur Respir Rev. 2010
  5. 19(117):217-219. [CrossRef] 5. Amjadi K, Alvarez GG, Vanderhelst E, et al. The prevalence of blebs or bullae among young healthy adults: a thoracoscopic investigation. Chest. 2007
  6. 132(4):1140-1145. [CrossRef] 6. Sahn SA, Heffner JE. Spontaneous pneumothorax. N Engl J Med. 2000
  7. 342(12):868-874. [CrossRef] 7. Ramouz A, Lashkari MH, Fakour S, Rasihashemi SZ. Randomized controlled trial on the comparison of chest tube drainage and needle aspiration in the treatment of primary spontaneous pneumothorax. Pak J Med Sci. 2018
  8. 34(6):1369-1374. [CrossRef] 8. Noppen M, De Keukeleire T. Pneumothorax. Respiration. 2008
  9. 76(2):121-127. [CrossRef] 9. Plojoux J, Froudarakis M, Janssens JP, Soccal PM, Tschopp JM. New insights and improved strategies for the management of primary spontaneous pneumothorax. Clin Respir J. 2019
  10. 13(4):195-201. [CrossRef] 10. Baumann MH, Strange C, Heffner JE, et al. Management of spontaneous pneumothorax: an American College of Chest Physicians Delphi consensus statement. Chest. 2001
  11. 119(2):590- 602. [CrossRef] 11. MacDuff A, Arnold A, Harvey J, BTS Pleural Disease Guideline Group. Management of spontaneous pneumothorax: British Thoracic Society pleural disease guideline 2010. Thorax. 2010
  12. 65(suppl 2):ii18-ii31. [CrossRef] 12. Riber SS, Riber LPS, Olesen WH, Licht PB. The influence of chest tube size and position in primary spontaneous pneumothorax. J Thorac Dis. 2017
  13. 9(2):327-332. [CrossRef] 13. Tsai TM, Lin MW, Li YJ, et al. The size of spontaneous pneumothorax is a predictor of unsuccessful catheter drainage. Sci Rep. 2017
  14. 7(1):181. [CrossRef] 14. Haefeli M, Elfering A. Pain assessment. Eur Spine J. 2006
  15. 15(suppl 1):S17-S24. [CrossRef] 15. Schnell J, Beer M, Eggeling S, et al. Management of spontaneous pneumothorax and post-interventional pneumothorax: German S3 guideline. Respiration. 2019
  16. 97(4):370-402. [CrossRef] 16. Balta C, Kuzucuo