KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Uluslararası tarım araştırmalarında yenilikçi yaklaşımlar dergisi (Online) / 2022 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1

Genotypes by Environment Interaction of Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Genotypes on Yield and Quality Parameters under Rainfed Conditions

İrfan ÖZTÜRK
Sayfa
27–40
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

G7, G24 and Aldane are located above the axis vertical genotypes are desirable based on parameters profiles.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The significant genotype (G) by environment (E) interaction and genetic diversity in the breeding programs are an essential issue for the breeder to develop new cultivars.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The experiment was conducted in the Trakia region, Turkey at five environments during the 2015-2016 growing cycles.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:G7, G24 and Aldane are located above the axis vertical genotypes are desirable based on parameters profiles.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2015-2016 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

The significant genotype (G) by environment (E) interaction and genetic diversity in the breeding programs are an essential issue for the breeder to develop new cultivars. The experiment was conducted in the Trakia region, Turkey at five environments during the 2015-2016 growing cycles. In the study, 25 advanced genotypes were used in randomized complete block design with four replications. Data on grain yield, days to heading, plant height, 1000-kernel weight, test weight, protein ratio, wet gluten content, gluten index, hardness, and sedimentation value were investigated. The results of variance analyses showed that there were significant differences (P<0.01) among genotypes based on all parameters investigated. Genotypes when tested across different environmental conditions often showed significant variation in grain yield. Mean grain yield across five locations ranged from the highest 6673 kg ha-1 to the smallest 5008 kg ha-1. Burgaz location was found near the ideal test environment of the average environment coordination. Therefore, location Burgaz should be regarded as the most suitable to select widely adapted genotypes. With the longest vectors from the origin, environments Edirne1 and Edirne2 were the most discriminating location. Considering simultaneously mean yield and stability, G7 and G12 were the best genotypes. G3 is more ideal genotype because it is located in the ideal center. So these genotypes can be used as for the evaluation of bread wheat genotypes in the region. With the longest vectors from the origin, traits plant height, gluten index and protein ratio was the most discriminating parameters. In the evaluation of genotypes, G2 and Pehlivan are quite stable because they are located close to the center of the horizontal axis. Genotype G3 is very favourable because it is located near the center of the horizontal axis and on all traits. G7, G24 and Aldane are located above the axis vertical genotypes are desirable based on parameters profiles.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ÖZTÜRK, İ. (2022). Genotypes by Environment Interaction of Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Genotypes on Yield and Quality Parameters under Rainfed Conditions. Uluslararası tarım araştırmalarında yenilikçi yaklaşımlar dergisi (Online), Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1, 27–40. https://ajindex.com/articles/417528

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (5)

  1. Akram, H.M., Iqbal, M.S., Saeed, M., Yar. A., Ali, A., and Sahi, K.A. (2004). Drought tolerance studies of wheat genotypes. Pak. J. Biol. Sci., 7: 88-92.
  2. Alwala, S., Kwolek, T., Mc.Pherson, M., Pellow, J., and Meyer, D. (2010). A comprehensive comparison between Eberhart and Russell joint regression and GGE biplot analyses to identify stable and high yielding maize hybrids. Field Crops Res. 119:225-230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2010.07.010 Anonymous, (1972). ICC.Standard methods of the international association for cereal chemistry (ICC). Methods No. 106/2. Vienna Verlag Moritz Schafer. Detmold, Germany Anonymous, (1984). ICC.Standard methods of the international association for cereal chemistry (ICC). Methods No. 116/1. Vienna Verlag Moritz Schafer. Detmold, Germany. Anonymous, (1990). AACC Approved Methods of the American Association of Cereal Chemist. USA. Anonymous, (2002). International Association for Cereal Sci. and Technology. (ICC Standart No: 110, Standart No: 105, Standart No: 106, Standart No: 155, Standart No: 116, Standart No: 115). Blakeney, A.B., Cracknell, R.L., Crosbie, G.B., Jefferies, S.P., Miskelly, D.M., O’Brien, L., Panozzo, J.F., Suter, D.A.I., Solah, V., Watts, T., Westcott, T., Williams, R.M. (2009). Understanding Wheat Quality. p: 8. GRDC, Kingston, Australia. Chaves, M.M., Pereira, J.S., Maroco, J., Rodrigues, M.L., Ricardo, C.P., Osorio, M.L., Carvalho, I., Faria, T., and Pinheiro, C. (2002). How plants cope with water stress in the field. Photosynthesis and growth. Annals Bot. 89: 907-916.
  3. Cooper, M., and Byth, D.E. (1996). Understanding plant adaptation to achieve systematic applied crop improvement: A fundamental challenge. In: Cooper, M and Hammer, GL (eds.) Plant adaptation and crop Wallingford: CABI Publishing. Coventry D.R, Gupta R.K, Yadav A, Poswal R.S, Chhokar R.S, Sharma R.K, Yadav V.K, Gill S.C, Kumar A, Mehta A, Kleemann S.G.L, Bonamano A, Cummins J.A. 2011. Wheat quality and productivity as affected by varieties and sowing time in Haryana, India. Field Crops Research, v.123, p.214-225.
  4. Gomez, K.A., & Gomez, A.A. (1984). Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. 2nd Ed. John Willey and Sons, Inc. New York. 641. Kendal, E., and Sayar, M.S. (2016). The stability of some spring triticale genotypes using biplot analysis. The Journal of Animal & Plant Sciences 26 (3): 754-765.
  5. Levitt, J. (1980). Responses of plants to environmental stresses. In: Physiological Ecology (Kozlowski, T.T., Ed) New York: Academic