KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 58

DETERMINATION OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN QUALITY OF TEACHING PROCESSES AND LEARNING RESOURCES WITH STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT (THE SAMPLE OF GAZIANTEP UNIVERSITY)

Murat ÖZDEMİR
Sayfa
0–0
Yayın Tarihi
2016-07-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The findings and results are discussed in parallel with similar researches and some recommendations are taken place in this respect.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The purpose of the present study is to determine whether the level of academic achievement of B.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:A. students in Gaziantep University is a meaningful predictor of the quality of teaching processes and learning resources of their higher education institution in 2014-2015 educational year.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The findings and results are discussed in parallel with similar researches and some recommendations are taken place in this respect.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:2014-2015 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

The purpose of the present study is to determine whether the level of academic achievement of B. A. students in Gaziantep University is a meaningful predictor of the quality of teaching processes and learning resources of their higher education institution in 2014-2015 educational year. The study is designed in the correlational survey model and the data are obtained by applying the scale to randomly selected 796 students. In data analysis, SPSS 20 program is used and Independent Samples T Test and Multiple Linear Regression among parametric analyses are applied to the data set showing normal distribution and .05 is accepted as the significance level. According to research findings, the participants’ views differ significantly in four of the sub-dimensions according to their gender and these sub-dimensions - career guidance services, teaching processes, campus life and assessment and evaluation - are found to predict about %15 of students’ grade point averages. It is extrapolated that some variables related to the teaching processes and learning resources in higher education institutions have a significant role in student achievement. The findings and results are discussed in parallel with similar researches and some recommendations are taken place in this respect.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ÖZDEMİR, M. (2016). DETERMINATION OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN QUALITY OF TEACHING PROCESSES AND LEARNING RESOURCES WITH STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT (THE SAMPLE OF GAZIANTEP UNIVERSITY). Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 58, 0–0. https://ajindex.com/articles/415231

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Ağıralioğlu, N. (2012). An approach to determine the quality of universities in Turkey. Journal of Higher Education and Science, 2(3), 147. Altbach, P. G. Reisberg, L., & Rumbley, L. E. (2009). Trends in global higher education: Tracking an academic revolution. France: UNESCO. Arslan, H. (2000). Academic quality assessment in Turkish undergraduate institutions. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). American University, Washington, D.C. Bandevica, L., & Ligotne, A. (2014). Higher education study programme quality assessment. Regional Formation and Development Studies, 7(2), 6-18.
  2. Bayrak, B. (2007). Yükseköğretim kurumlarından beklenen hizmet kalitesi ve hizmet kalitesinin algılanmasına yönelik bir araştırma. (Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi). Marmara Üniversitesi,
  3. İstanbul.
  4. Brown, T. (1999). Challenging globalization as discourse and phenomenon. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 18(1), 3-17.
  5. Burgaz, B., & Şentürk, İ (2008). Küreselleşmenin eğitim fakültelerinin yönetim boyutundaki etkileri. Manas Journal of Social Studies, (19), 269-280.
  6. Büyüköztürk, S., Çakmak, E. K., Akgün, O. E., Karadeniz, S., ve Demirel, F. (2013). Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri (15. Baskı.) Ankara:
  7. Pegem Akademi. Crosby, P. B. (1979). Quality is free: The Art of making quality certain. New York: New American Library. Çetinsaya, G. (2014). Büyüme, kalite, uluslararasılaşma: Türkiye Yükseköğretimi için bir yol haritası (2. Baskı). Eskişehir: Anadolu Üniversitesi Basımevi. Demirel, O., & Kaya, Z. (2013). Eğitim bilimine giriş (8. Baskı). Ankara:
  8. Pegem Akademi. Deveci, N. K. (2012). Türk yükseköğretiminde eğitim-öğretim hizmetlerinin kalite düzeyinin ve kalite yükseltme çalışmalarının incelenmesi: Türkiye’deki devlet ve vakıf üniversiteleri üzerinde bir saha çalışması. (Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Atatürk Üniversitesi,
  9. Erzurum. Ensign, J., & Woods, A. M. (2014). Strategies for increasing academic achievement in higher education, Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 85(6), 17-22,
  10. Erdem, A. R. (2012). Küreselleşme: Türk yükseköğretimine etkisi. Journal of Higher Education, 2(2), 109-117.
  11. Erdem, A. R. (2013). Bilgi toplumunda üniversitenin değişen rolleri ve görevleri. Journal of Higher Education, 3(2), 109-120.
  12. Gültekin, M., & Şengül, S. A. ( 2006). Avrupa Birliği’nin eğitimde kaliteyi belirleyici alan ve göstergeleri acısından Türk eğitim sisteminin durumu. Anadolu University Journal of Social Studies, (2), 145-170.
  13. Hacıfazlıoğlu, O. (2006). Avrupa Birliği yükseköğ